So
little evidence of wrong - doing that they have to sex it up!
Not exact matches
The trouble is, they have very
little evidence to go on save for a missing front tooth, a collection
of hospital wristbands and a wedding ring on very much the
wrong finger.
That's
wrong, mainly because the writer (whose bio gives
little evidence of personal expertise in successful bookselling) misinterprets the reported customer purchase percentages.
Having said that, I'm always open to new ways
of thinking — after all, if you believed in a spherical earth a few hundread years ago, you would have been considered radical and
wrong — but so far
little evidence that Austrian Economics can be used successfully.
that might be a fair statement
of what most people who work in the field believe, but I think that the
evidence accumulated shows them to have been
wrong for a
little over 3 decades now.
Here is an example
of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are
wrong - One hundred years isn't enough
evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too
little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.