Sentences with phrase «little more fuel economy»

The suspension feels loose on the freeway, and the car could use a sixth gear to squeeze out a little more fuel economy.

I'm very disappointed that this, just like the Accord Hybrid and the Highlander Hybrid is just another attempt by the diehard big iron fanatics to use the hybrid drivetrain to squeeze a little more fuel economy out of the only thing they believe should really propel a reasonably performing car — a big V engine.

Using a thinner oil allows manufacturers to eek out a little more fuel economy.

Not exact matches

If you'd rather pay a little more money for better fuel economy, the RX 450h hybrid isn't a bad way to do it, with just as much power on tap when you need it, but the added benefit of limited EV operation when you don't.

This hybrid wagon's strong fuel economy and spacious cabin makes it smart choice for people who need a little more space during their long commute home.

The V6 is more than adequate; in fact, I could have made do with a little less power, or different gearing, if it meant improved fuel economy.

However, the only difference will be in fuel economy that is now 29/27 mpg and this is justified because the car has little more weights.

While the battery does continue to contribute to the drive even when it is showing zero driving kilometres, something a little larger would improve fuel economy even more.

The manual transmission makes driving it a little more fun for drivers that like to do its own shifting and the manual shifting also helps improve the Honda Civic's fuel economy.

Aside from these being stellar figures for cars its size and weight in relation to the engine displacement, perhaps the most notable fact about the 328d's fuel economy is that it actually bests its ActiveHybrid 3 stablemate, which managed only 33 mpg highway while stickering out at a little more than $ 50,000.

The diesel engine generates a little more noise and vibration than the 2.5 Liter engine, but it's still a better choice thanks to its snappier acceleration (both on flat surfaces, and going uphill) and gives excellent fuel economy.

Subcompact crossovers are swiftly developing their own fan base among drivers who want something a little more spacious than your average hatchback with the convenience and fuel economy of something smaller than a crossover.

The peppy little subcompact received better fuel economy, more interior space, and plenty of new gadgets.

While it'll be more expensive to buy and run than the 187bhp 2.0 - litre diesel, our experience has shown it to be smoother and faster — although this will be of little consequence if fuel economy is your priority; the diesels simply make more sense from the point of view of running costs.

Yup, the car that everyone is fêting as the future of the supercar, the roadster that combines BMW performance with near - Toyota Prius fuel economy left me more than a little cold.

They're great for delivering high fuel economy and make terrific city cars, but if you have any thoughts of freeway driving, you may want to consider a more powerful turbocharged version to make merging a little easier.

Challenger SXT models have the same retro muscle - car silhouette as the others, but they're a little bit more sensible, with a low base price and reasonable fuel economy on the highway, while still providing satisfying acceleration for most everyday driving.

In 2011, the Forester received a new version of the 2.5 - liter engine, one making a little more horsepower and torque, and a little bit better fuel economy.

Speaking of fuel, the 2016 Cruze boasts impressive fuel economy, meaning you can enjoy your commutes just a little bit more knowing that you'll spend more time getting to where you need to go instead of filling up at the pump.

In the Sonata, the addition of a turbo successfully combines a bunch more power with very little sacrifice in fuel economy, but the question I asked myself is this — does it noticeably alter the demeanor of Hyundai's well - rounded midsizer?

If you want slightly better fuel economy and a little more horsepower, the Crosstrek also comes as a hybrid, ranging from $ 25,995 to $ 29,225 with about the same differences in standard equipment across the price range.

The air suspension is an excellent feature, but a few more gears in the transmission would increase fuel economy from the big V - 8 a little.

And for those who want more power or towing capacity, the 6.2 - liter V8, available only on the Denali trim level, is tops in its class, offering significantly more power and torque with very little penalty in fuel economy.

The weather may be getting cooler, but Hyundai is certainly feeling the heat after revealing that fuel economy estimates on a number of its top sellers may have been a little too lofty... The news, which affects almost one million vehicles of Hyundai and sister division Kia, for model years 2011 to 2013, came after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was... Read More

Also the engine, now to AM29 spec has been revised with a little more power and torque but incredibly less emissions and better fuel economy due to the new Bosch engine management system.

New 2.5 - litre SkyActiv engine in CX - 5 GT model produces 18 % more power and 23 % greater torque with little sacrifice in fuel economy.

Pros: Fuel economy, spacious cabin, visibility, front headroom, cargo space, large storage bin, low maintenance, takes a very little time to fill up, extra weight on the rear axle keeps it more stable on slippery roads, brakes last longer.

With an MSRP over $ 32,000 and scant volume with which to offer deals, vehicles like the Dodge Grand Caravan / Chrysler Town & Country and Kia Sedona offer a ton more space in their «Murican - size packages for about the same money, with very little sacrifice in fuel economy.

Not everyone will appreciate what Ram has done under the hood, but we can't argue with the option for roughly 10 % better fuel economy and more responsiveness, at little cost.

Optional is Chrysler's 5.7 - liter HEMI V8; somewhat surprisingly, the bigger engine provides significantly more power and torque with fuel economy that's actually a little better.

Unfortunately, Ford's more visible commitment to boost SUV fuel economy will mean little if these gains continued to be swamped by increasing sales of inefficient pickups elsewhere in their fleet.

Here is an example of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are wrong - One hundred years isn't enough evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.

«They showed the fuel cell could be improved, made more compact and powerful, at relatively little cost, and that the hydrogen economy was a long - term concept for governments to aspire to.»

And the Car and Driver article did little more than boast the Fusion's 34 - mpg fuel economy, and call it a «game changer» that's fun to drive.