Sentences with phrase «little objective evidence»

«We are seeing advancements in recovery following rehabilitation, but little objective evidence.

Not exact matches

Not necessarily in tone or by being insulting (thankfully there's been relatively little of that from both sides), but in that we require and unashamedly DEMAND real, objective evidence.
Eventually enough people will come to their senses and will pay more attention to objective evidence - based research and not the simple little fairy tales in religious texts that made sense back when humans were far less educated.
It is trust given with little or no basis in objective evidence.
Denial on the other hand, is being skeptical of an assertion that has a lot of objective evidence, little to no conflicting objective evidence, and has been independently verified and often is consistent across multiple disciplines, but hasn't been «proved».
I always find plenty of «evidence» for extended breastfeeding but for some reason I have always been a little sceptical of it (and don't have the time, money or inclination to read the articles referenced)-- probably because the sources are pro-extended breastfeeding and therefore less than objective.
As any researcher can immediately note, such surveys have little usefulness as objective evidence, because they are based on subjective opinions that can change based on who is working in classrooms, because survey designs can be flawed with leading questions yielding results favorable to the pollster, and because survey designs can change drastically from year to year.
While the stated objective of the PB framework is to «guide human societies» away from a state of the Earth system that is «less hospitable to the development of human societies», it offers little scientific evidence to support the connection between the global state of specific Earth system processes and human well - being.
Confirmation bias may thus be especially harmful to objective evaluations regarding nonconforming results, since biased individuals may regard opposing evidence to be weak in principle and give little serious thought to revising their beliefs.
BC Injury Law And ICBC Claims Blog Subjective Soft Tissue Injuries And Judicial Scrutiny Last year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that «``... the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery...» and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada's reasons in FH v. McDougall.
(ICBC's doctor) impressed upon me that he was more of an advocate for ICBC than an objective expert, and I therefoe attach little wieght to his evidence.
There is little evidence to prove that a resume which lacks an objective is favored by employers.
There is very little evidence that resumes without objectives make it to the «to be interviewed» pile.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z