Sentences with phrase «little risk balance»

Have said that for 5 - 10 year, if you can take little risk balance fund / large cap may fetch better return than debit fund post tax.

Not exact matches

On balance the risks of raising rates seem a little more likely to play out and much more serious than the risks of standing still on rates.

In short, a balance between too much and too little risk.

To help take the guesswork out of feeding your little one the Evenflo Balance + Wide Neck Bottles have molded measurement markers in both ounces and milliliters to provide an easy and accurate way to measure the volume of liquids without the risk of the measurements washing off.

If mom is always giving in to their little one at the slightest whimper, babies risk choking, allergic reaction, and exposure to food that might not be as balanced as their baby food.

If too little has been paid, a postdoc risks a large payment of the balance and possibly a penalty.

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

There is probably little or no difference in weight loss and changes in cardiovascular risk factors up to two years of follow - up when overweight and obese adults, with or without type 2 diabetes, are randomised to low CHO diets and isoenergetic balanced weight loss diets.»

2) Cardiovascular Health: A 2005 study conducted by researchers from Harvard Medical School found that consuming as little as two ounces of nuts, such as Brazil nuts, per week as part of a healthy, balanced diet can help lower the risk for heart disease.

«It is a balance between doing what you know your partner loves and taking a little risk to try something you think they may like.

Recently self - publishers are trying to balance «if it's cheap it's not worth anything» and «cheap is so little risk that you ought to check it out» and getting over that consumer reluctance, I think.

Also, life can intervene in your ability to pay off a large balance in a year, so there is a little bit of risk involved.

Will that choice balance out their risk a little better?

The results are presented in a little table to examine three scenarios for future returns (a base, worst, and best case), which you can of course define yourself, and for four risk profiles / asset allocations: ultra-conservative (all fixed income), balanced (50/50), risk tolerant (mostly stocks), and all stocks.

For my retirement (20 - 25 yr): EPF (6000 / m, deduction at the source), PPF (2000 / m), Axis Long Term Equity (3000 / m; EPF+PPF+SSY+ELSS — 1.5 lakh for tax savings), Franklin India Prima Plus (4000 / m), Franklin India Smaller co (3000 / m) and Tata balanced Fund (4000 / m)(I am little confused here to choose a large cap like Birla Sunlife Frontline Eq Fund which will be comparatively low risk or a balanced fund)

As a result, I believe it makes sense to increase your equity exposure a little compared to what you might have done when bonds were more attractive, and to balance that by choosing conservative stocks that carry less risk than the overall market.

These are similar to normal Equity oriented balanced funds like HDFC balanced fund / TATA balanced fund etc., 2 — If you can take little bit of risk, may be an MIP fund is suitable.

«Once one has a well - diversified, balanced portfolio of a dozen or so stocks, adding additional stocks does little to reduce risk, yet there's obviously a big penalty in terms of performance if one's best ideas are 3 - 5 % positions instead of 7 - 10 % positions.»

The good news is that a balanced mutual fund moves smoothly to achieve considerable amount of returns with little or moderate risks.

Outerwall has historically produced high returns on capital, and it's a business that doesn't need much tangible capital to produce huge amounts of cash flow (an attractive business), but it has been run similar to companies that get purchased by private equity firms — leverage up the balance sheet, issue a dividend (or buyout some shareholders), thus keeping very little equity «at risk».

Maybe in some happy future, once we get the costs and risks into a reasonable balance, fine tuned science will be needed to fine tune the policy, but at present there is little that «further research» can offer in that regard.