Sentences with phrase «little science here»

There is little science here.

Not exact matches

Here's a little science for you.

Nearly all the atheists posting here who hold science up like it is a religion know very little about science.

It's quite clear from the rhetoric here that most of these deniers have very little understanding of what's going on in science.

Summer has been a bit of a washout so far, but here are 10 fab indoor super simple science ideas for kids to keep your little ones stimulated.

Here's a little video from Lunch Love Community, in which a sixth grade science class in Berkeley, CA sets fire to some Flaming Hot Cheetos.

Those of you familiar with my blog here at SciAm will know that I'm a little obsessed with science - themed music videos.

«This is funding that is sorely needed... by researchers who, in many countries, are finding national science budgets squeezed and little money available for pan-European collaboration,» research commissioner Máire Geoghegan - Quinn told reporters here today.

Before I share it with you, here's a little science behind the need for iron: Females tend to have lower iron counts because hemoglobin levels are naturally lower in females than in males.

Here's a little bit of historical science behind the accepted caloric value of protein, carb, and fat in the diet.

Summer is here — a great time to get out, explore nature, and have a little family science fun.

About as unlike Hairy London as it's possible to get and still feature here, Kit Reed's Little Sisters of the Apocalypse is a novel that treads the indistinct boundaries between fantasy, science fiction and realism, as befits an author who describes her work as «transgenred».

Some people have been saying Barry Rithotz's writing has been going downhill of late (here), and we did like the old non-Bloomberg Barry a little better ourselves if truth must be told — but one of his most recent pieces is a peach, where he ties in volatility, investing, science, and climate change together.

Some of you might remember all the trouble I had with Pisco «s food... he started on Pro Plan... but he was born with a lack of a digestive ensyma... so his stool was always loose... after a while the vet recomended Prescription Science Diet... he was on that for a while and it worked well but here it is SO expensive and it only comes in the small package... one day someone gave me a sample of Dog Chow from Purina and I tried it and guess what he liked it and didi n`t do anything to his tummy... I changed his Prescription to Dog chow and never had any problem... he even started to gain a little weight and is very healthy and active, I do give him calcium and vitamin supplements since I know it «s not a premium food... but for Pisco it «s the one that workes.

Spore creator Will Wright has been talking about the influence of science in his upcoming and oh - so - highly anticipated universe - sim for a while now and while this new trailer above is nothing especially new, particularly to those who saw Wright's hour - long keynote at GDC (a 35 minute edit of which can be found here), it has got me hoping for something a little deeper in this game.

For the uninitiated, here's a little bit of context: Unreal Tournament drew first blood on the PC in 1999, with a fanciful, science fiction tone and particularly gory splatters.

The Republicans are little different on science and innovation, despite transitory nods to the need for a sustained push in this arena, including a recent column from George Will, as discussed here:

Re long vs. short: «I come here specifically for the reason that working scientists give the subject matter a detailed treatment while bringing it down a notch that non-subject matter experts can understand with a little work and little background knowledge of math & science.»

And, last time I looked, there's precious little censoring of true debate going on here... in fact, there's very little in the way of defense of the science and math that's being debated here.

But here you are with an entire thread dedicated to discussing the release of emails where little if any actual science is discussed.

He has certainly lost the «science» blog owner / Science auditor title as there is very little science discussed here since November 2009 — a very sad state of ascience» blog owner / Science auditor title as there is very little science discussed here since November 2009 — a very sad state of aScience auditor title as there is very little science discussed here since November 2009 — a very sad state of ascience discussed here since November 2009 — a very sad state of affairs.

Here's the counter-punch to the highly science - qualified Oreskes... «Major Danish Daily Warns: «Globe May Be On Path To Little Ice Age... Much Colder Winters... Dramatic Consequences»!

† If you know a little building science, you can look at the photo below and know immediately what's going on here.

Here is a little bit: http://www.media.rice.edu/media/NewsBot.asp?MODE=VIEW&ID=12794&SnID=1419357327 «In a nutshell, theoretical models can not explain what we observe in the geological record,» said oceanographer Gerald Dickens, a co-author of the study and professor of Earth science at Rice University.

So then I led you to the one little bit of hard science that this whole global warming fraud hangs on and, lets see here...

I have little to add to the science or conclusions of this, since I've said it so many times here on the blog (see Related Posts at the bottom for more info).

As a bystander of little science expertise, but some experience in public policy analysis, here is a framing of the three major rebuttals I've seen to Bates» claims.

A little OT but I was struck by a comment at Anastassia's site on a page entitled «A small - scale fight for truth mirrored in a Science Comment» here.

A science teacher pointed out to me that those little organisms that live near the deep ocean vents will no doubt carry on living here.)

In the spirit of this season of good cheer, and as a respite for the increasing number of those out there suffering from «apocalypse fatigue,» your obedient servants at the Center for the Study of Science are here to bring you a little holiday joy and good news.

So there appears to be little in the way of a real time ordinary down to earth reality acquired from the human masses in so much of the rarified climate science posturing that we down here at this level are being force fed.

Ah, but here's a rebuttal you could have to my «logic»: «If the only products for some service suck, then I won't subscribe to that service, yet I'm forced to buy into the climate models via taxes, government regulation, etc.» If we just stick to the science, though, and you're not forced to buy, then you might just have to admit that the models are the best there is and you have very little basis for demonstrating that they are worse than they should be.

If you've paid attention to anything I've written here, then you ought to know that my view of law is that most of it isn't difficult enough to be anything close to rocket science, and what is has little to do with law or rationality.

In The Little Scientist Blog, Here you will find curiosities and useful writings about science.