Sentences with phrase «little science there»

Look at the most recent blog posts and commenter posts — very little science there, very little of anything really.

Ehrenreich systematically deconstructs — and then demolishes — what little science there is behind the positive - psychology movement and the allegedly salubrious effects of positive thinking.

Not exact matches

It turned out that like Time didn't really do anything until the iPad actually shipped and Popular Science came out later and stuff, so I think I was a little puzzled that there wasn't more magazine type material on the iPad when it launched.

Or perhaps you can pause for a moment and think about all the paranormal activity that goes on from UFO's to ghosts and spirits and you will realize that science does not have all the answers and there is little more to life than what society will have you believe.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

There's no denying that Sheldon's science is distorted a little by status and self - esteem issues, but he wouldn't think of going to HR to get protected from the hurtful (and hilarious) venom of Leslie Winkle.

There is very little in true science (not science bent to fit the bible fairy tales) to support creationism, christianity and the bible.

There are very little paralells between religion and science.

It sounds a little complicated, but over on Gizmag, there are a handful of diagrams that show the science behind the technology.

There is the ongoing problem of biased representation in the media, with plenty of space given to the atheistic opinions of Hawking and Dawkins, and little if any coverage given to the promotion and integration of science which takes place within the context of the Church.

To have the absurdity to think that there is NO Heaven or GOD just b / c his little science projects cant prove it otherwise.

It's not evolutionary «THEORY» with no proof... Read a little about science, there is proof about evolution all around us... And to «This Again»?

It's like global warming — you will always find some global warming deniers out there who can quote some little piece of research they have found somewhere, some science junk, but the consensus is there.»

It is our belief that, until theology takes such a christocentric vision fully on board and synthesises it with the world of modern science, there will be little genuine renewal of theology and the primacy of Christ will continue to be foreign to the hearts and minds of the people.

We have religious nuts claiming Science is a hoax, and science nuts claiming that just because I figured this little thing out it means there is Science is a hoax, and science nuts claiming that just because I figured this little thing out it means there is science nuts claiming that just because I figured this little thing out it means there is no God.

Let us be clear in our minds that there is a sharp difference between the attitude of the dedicated man of science and the man who, with little real knowledge of science, sees in it the answer to all the problems of humanity.

First, while there is little in the Bible that could be called science, the book of Genesis is very clear about where the universe came from.

Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?

The speculation that it was in a «section on preaching to the «half breeds» / Samaritans» might be some handy way someone sections off that section of the book, but to assume every incident within a certain part of scripture is there like a Science book identifying the phylum and genus of an animal, that is, that everything mentioned under the Raccoon Family is in the Raccoon Family (the ring - tail cat, kinkajou, coatimundi... three other members of the raccoon family), is an assumption that does not seem to apply to the Bible and how it is written... it is more human, and living, and not sterile, everything in its tight little unmovable section, etc..

OK... I am going to jump straight in to the recipe this post because while these marshmallows are pretty simple to make, there is a little science involved.

Turns out there's a little science behind that, as he hasn't had that one boffo breakout season, even as he's been productive.

There's little question that many walk - ons are walk - ons simply because the evaluation system broke down, pointing to what UCLA coach Terry Donahue, a former Bruin walk - on defensive tackle, calls «the imperfect science of recruiting.»

But while many products claim to be miracle workers — science and researchers agree there is very little proven results from such measures.

While there are criticisms associated with extended breastfeeding, your instinct which is backed by modern science, will tell you that you are in fact doing the right thing for you and your little one.

Whether your little one is into princesses, crafts, science, cars — or all of the above — there's something for everyone.

There's a little something for everyone, geared to kids from ages 1 on up to 12: coloring pages, a yoga storybook, science experiments and literary projects, mandala drawing tutorials, treasure baskets and sensory bins, modeling play, and much more.

There are many text books available for key stage 3 science, but we have found most of them to be full of theory with little room for hands - on science or questions, although they are interesting and provide good background to science, although there are some which suggest experiments, many of which can be done at There are many text books available for key stage 3 science, but we have found most of them to be full of theory with little room for hands - on science or questions, although they are interesting and provide good background to science, although there are some which suggest experiments, many of which can be done at there are some which suggest experiments, many of which can be done at home.

Unlike the Field Museum or Science & Industry, there's a sense of intimacy about our little museum.

There's no exact science to choosing the best baby travel system, but it's hard to picture mom life without one, especially when it comes time to leave the house with a little on in tow.

We decided to skip the Science Museum since it was a little too much for our young audience and also there is just so much stimulation kids can take in...

One thing about which there can be little controversy: a need to encourage ever more K - 12 students to embrace science and engineering.

That means there's little point in pitching stories from major journals such as Nature and Science, or from press sites such as Newswise or EurekAlert!

As wonderful as blogging is, there's very little that's going to contribute to a grant or paper,» said Dr. Isis, a pseudonymous blogger who focuses on gender issues in science and scientific lifestyles, when she spoke at ScienceOnline2011 by video link, wearing sunglasses, a surgical mask, and a woolly pirate hat to conceal her identity.

«The daily practice of going to the lab and indulging in scientific research absorbs you so much that there is very little left for other explorations, especially if you're ambitious» in science, he says.

Steve: I mean, even if you cut these guys all the slack in the world, and say that they were sincere in their efforts and there was no mendacity involved, then the movie is just sort of incompetent in its presentation of the issue and of whatever science it tries to get into which is, you know, very little, but that's it.

Professor Alastair Lewis, from York's Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories and the National Centre for Atmospheric Science, said: «Over 40 per cent of children have at least one smoking parent and whereas there is a general public awareness about the harms of second hand smoke, there is little knowledge about the dangers of third hand smoke.

There has been disquiet in Irish government circles that there has been little return on its massive investment in science over the past 10 yThere has been disquiet in Irish government circles that there has been little return on its massive investment in science over the past 10 ythere has been little return on its massive investment in science over the past 10 years.

«When we look forward several decades, climate models predict such profound loss of Arctic sea ice that there's little doubt this will negatively affect polar bears throughout much of their range, because of their critical dependence on sea ice,» said Kristin Laidre, a researcher at the University of Washington's Polar Science Center in Seattle and co-author of a study on projections of the global polar bear population.

There seems to be little doubt that this material will soon play an important role in materials science all over the world, much like graphene has in the last couple of years.

«If it is a forensic science degree, there is little or no anthropology, so you have to do that afterwards.

I've attended many video game conferences, so I do speak with a little bit of authority that what I see there is so far advanced than what we have in science that it's time that we start getting together.

«For a long time, there's been this story about bullies that they're a little more hale and hearty,» said lead author William Copeland, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University School of Medicine.

So far, there's little evidence that scientific publishers have been seriously affected: None of 22 journals or journal publishers contacted by Science has rejected a research paper solely because of libel concerns, for example.

And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling about the fact that journalists still are doing stories about, you know, the debate around climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a debate, there's consensus that anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?

And there's a whole sort of Shakespeare industry where, you know, not just biographies of Shakespeare, although there's, you know, there's usually a couple that come out almost every year and books about Shakespeare's life and times, but there's very little I've found about Shakespeare and the world of science.

Although the total numbers are not yet known, Dayton noted that «there is little to suggest any recovery from the $ 2.2 billion decline in support for science, innovation, and research since 2014.»

Until recently, there was little love lost between researchers and the E.U. Scientists have long bemoaned Europe's Framework Programmes for their focus on applied research, the forced collaboration between many labs and companies across the continent, the crippling bureaucracy, and what many see as too much meddling by politicians and bureaucrats in Brussels (Science, 8 December 2006).

With two Dutch researchers bagging last year's Nobel Prize for physics and recent analyses rating the Netherlands among the world's scientific leaders, per capita (Science, 7 February 1997, p. 793), there seems little reason to worry.

Postrel's claim was only that there was a spike in the number of people applying to study the weird little field of forensic science — not Science as a whole; that latter figure, in the U.K., is indeed declining, and in the United States is merely holding steady even as the pace and scope of science exscience — not Science as a whole; that latter figure, in the U.K., is indeed declining, and in the United States is merely holding steady even as the pace and scope of science exScience as a whole; that latter figure, in the U.K., is indeed declining, and in the United States is merely holding steady even as the pace and scope of science exscience explodes.

She feels that the privatisation of science will destroy what little internal democracy there is.