Sentences with phrase «little science understood»

Not exact matches

It is unfortunate reading through these posts to find how little science and the scientific process is understood by the masses.

You still seem a little angry at your fellow human beings even though some are trying to help you understand that science is not your enemy, but an aid to helping you understand the world

not a random process at all), evolution as «just a theory» (might want to learn what theory means in science), and Darwin's BS deathbed recantation identify you as having gotten your information from misleading sources, i.e., sources that have little understanding, and perhaps very little honesty, concerning evoutionary research.

Joel «Our understanding of the world through science often reveals a little more of the nature of God.»

Our understanding of the world through science often reveals a little more of the nature of God.

This discussion has little or nothing to do with a belief in a god, it has everything to do with making some intelligent attempt to understand and expand upon science.

But the problem is that after ten years, I'm getting tired of trying to convince fellow Christians that I am, in fact, a Christian, even though I may vote a little differently than they vote, interpret the Bible differently than they interpret it, engage with science a little differently than they engage with it, and understand sovereignty and choice a little differently than they understand those things.

Ultimately, this book, while good, is little more than an introduction to some of the key themes and issues surrounding the interpretation and understanding of Genesis 1 in light of modern science.

All Science proves is how little we know about who God is and how much more we need to learn and understand who God is.

It's quite clear from the rhetoric here that most of these deniers have very little understanding of what's going on in science.

He explained history as a universal science, but he had little understanding of nature.

This is such a great sensory activity for little ones, H doesn't understand the science behind the way the goo feels, but she got so much out of just being left to explore and play by herself.

To really understand this concept, let's delve into a little science for a moment.

We know life evolved in the oceans... but many of the organisms we studied are uncharacterized, little known to science, and we have a lot of work to do understand where these organisms fit in in our understanding of life.»

Because his grad school research had gone so easily, he says, he had little idea of the challenges involved in doing good science and had been «too immature» to understand that he required further seasoning: «Chaikoff was right to tell me I needed more training, and I was certainly wrong to end - run him.

Moreover, there's been very little understanding of the fundamental science of how resist actually works at the chemical level, says Deirdre Olynick, staff scientist at the Molecular Foundry.

The science behind this has been little understood until now, and possible effects on human cells were not previously investigated.

The panel at the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science took place as more scientists consider engaging in public policy debates in response to the election of President Trump, who they fear has little understanding or respect for their work.

If one takes a little time to understand the science that Trenberth is discussing, his meaning becomes clear.

I would say that as far as advancing our ability to really look at the issue of climate change, I think one of the things we really need to do is to make our models interact more between the physical sciences and the social economics, and to really understand the link a little more closely between climate change and the drivers and impacts of climate change.

Whether you have little ones or not, it's smart to understand the science behind the most buzzed - about chemicals.

Since gene sequencing technology became a key part of the medical and health sciences around a little over a decade ago, we now understand a lot more about the importance of genetic variations.

Also, the story has to follow a predictable path, I fully understand that, which means it's important for the hero to lose everything at the end of the second act, but I have a feeling that most of the audience will be a little confused as well as depressed since the science - heavy talk abounds at the same time the hero is at his lowest.

Some exam schools — such as Stuyvesant, Boston Latin, Thomas Jefferson and Illinois Math and Science Academy — are well known, but the sector as a whole (enrolling 136,000 students, about 1 percent of the total high school population) is little understood.

Though their motives aren't clear to me, there's no doubt whatsoever that they have little understanding of the key issues surrounding TNR — never mind the relevant science.

But before I can give any advice on proactively preventing or treating dog ear infections, we need to understand why and how they occur... And that calls for a little anatomy and a little science!

Frankly, I worry about the number of journalists commenting on climate who appear to have little understanding of the science.

Re long vs. short: «I come here specifically for the reason that working scientists give the subject matter a detailed treatment while bringing it down a notch that non-subject matter experts can understand with a little work and little background knowledge of math & science.»

But if he's saying that there's little or no value to enhancing public understanding of mercury's dangers, or to trying to enhance public understanding of any science - related issues via efforts analogous to RC's efforts, he loses me.

I did an unusually wide range of subjects at university, a little bit of a lot of things including humanities, some science, and various design disciplines, so I have some understanding of how things» connect».

If they really understood the science, then the occasional outbursts by denialists would generate no more notice than a fart in polite company — a little embarassment for the offender, but no overt comment.

When it comes to climate science, compared to most at RC, I understand little.

And before I start hearing again about how stupid my questions are and how little I understand about climate science, this is in fact a concern expressed by many of the climate scientists I've been reading and listening to.

I also found that most of the contention stemmed from poor writing and editing, too little understanding of both science and communications, an overly bureaucratic process, and a few people who didn't think they needed to follow the rules.

[Response: I've worked with the PM people a fair bit, and once you understand a little of their cultural and historical role, they do a pretty good job on the science — and since their circulation is much larger than SciAm, Discover or Seed, finding ways to reach their audience is certainly worthwhile.

This is a great way to understand the science behind microbial fuel cells and make a little renewable energy at home.

Nye should be grateful they don't jail entertainers pretending to be something that they are not, as this episode clearly shows he has little understanding of science.

If you find it difficult to understand this simple point, then I fear that I would have very little confidence in any «science» you cared to present.

The complex relationship between science, communication and policy (which is not as linear as some might think or wish it to be) and the complex relationship between science, advocacy and silence is however little understood (and quite easily misunderstood) and needs much more research.

To understand why requires a little knowledge of nonlinear dynamics and complexity science.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

Within this dichotomous logic, the deterministic part supposedly represents cause - effect relationships and, thus, is physics and science (the «good»), whereas randomness has little relationship with science and no relationship with understanding (the «evil»).

If the science was only 15 or 20 years old, one might be a little more understanding and compassionate — although I would not be among them.

It exploits people's «Chicken Little, the sky is falling» fears, demands an international solution, and most don't understand the science.

It shows little if any true understanding of heat, temperature, thermal capacities, energy, radiation or any meaningful physical science relating to the subject in question.

Wally says: «You need to understand the relative size of climate science field when compared to something with a little more history and relevance to human life, like biology.»

You need to understand the relative size of climate science field when compared to something with a little more history and relevance to human life, like biology.

The UN political cabal understands that the science charade can keep going a little longer, but it is putting in place insurances to mitigating against lasting damage, hence the scramble to ensure all governments are signed - up to pledges.

That said, with this little tantrum, Mann has arranged humiliation for himself and a public discredit to climate science, at a time when public understanding of the same is not what it might be.

When you understand the science and all that underpins it then the tendency is indeed to look at deniers as er... less than competent and laugh a little behind your hand.