Sentences with phrase «little smoking gun»

Not exact matches

On the split screen, familiar spliced video footage replayed what little most of us know — or care to know — about bin Laden: wearing a turban, sitting drinking tea, a long salt and pepper beard, speaking to friends, crouching holding a machine gun, skyscrapers smoking.

She is sure to say, «I'm sorry, I don't know that,» and then I can intone «Hey Google» into the phone and pose the question or just spin around, sit in the chair, and do a Google search without saying a single word) roasted to hell and back with several careless wrist - shakes of black pepper, salt, garlic powder, sweet smoked paprika, red pepper flakes, and a touch of nutritional yeast (which I will never call «nooch» even if you put a gun to my temple and tell me that pulling the trigger will not yield a little flag emblazoned with the word «Bang!»).

«People are likely to react with little fear to certain types of objectively dangerous risk that evolution has not prepared them for, such as guns, hamburgers, automobiles, smoking, and unsafe sex, even when they recognize the threat at a cognitive level,» says Carnegie Mellon University researcher George Loewenstein, whose seminal 2001 paper, «Risk as Feelings,» (pdf) debunked theories that decision making in the face of risk or uncertainty relies largely on reason.

We won't even have the gases, just little squiggles in a spectrum, so I don't know that there will be a definitive «smoking gun.»

In terms of the smoking gun, so if you look at, I'm on page three here, your testosterone at 496 is not bad, but it's, you know, depending on if you look at an optimal reference range for testosterone, it's maybe a little bit on the low side.

Since that PR campaign does not resemble any sort of sinister plot to manufacture doubt out of thin air, it is little wonder why neither Gore nor any other accuser who quotes from its leaked memos has ever had the courage to directly show those to the public as «smoking gun» proof of skeptic climate scientists» guilt.

So, what we have here from Bud Ward is little more than half the story, with the basic idea of trusting Gelbspan as some kind of highly regarded investigative journalist who found smoking gun proof that skeptic climate scientists are shills paid by the fossil fuel industry to lie to the public.