Sentences with phrase «little uncertainty about him»

Complex forecasting methods are only accurate when there is little uncertainty about the data and the situation (in this case: how the climate system works), and causal variables can be forecast accurately.

But there is little uncertainty about how it has responded thus far.

«There's little uncertainty about sea level rise,» he added.

Uncertainty about rain, little uncertainty about sea level rise Climate change could also affect precipitation in California, though the two models USGS used in its research produced different results.

Not exact matches

A little - known consumer sentiment gauge, called the Policy Uncertainty Index, is actually keeping tabs on how everyone outside the Beltway is feeling about the political situation.

There have been many recent rumours regarding Arsenal players with all the uncertainty around the club at the moment, but there was very little said about our French striker Olivier Giroud, who has recently signed a contract extension with the Gunners.

As you can constantly have visual access to your little angel, it reduces or eliminates the anxiety that arises when there's uncertainty about how baby is doing.

CHALLENGES: Uncertainties about landslide dynamics aside, there's little information on which areas are most vulnerable to slides.

Scientists are divided about the need to label GMOs: There is little scientific evidence of health or ecological threats, but many uncertainties remain.

«While there will always be uncertainty about future conditions and challenges, investing in strategies that are culturally appropriate, have little regret (low risk) and provide multiple benefits appears the best pathway,» the team suggests.

How much more difficult must it be when there is uncertainty about the grammar or vocabulary, or little differences that mean so much.

There is relatively little consensus about how climate change will affect the incidence of persistent drought at global and regional scales, in large part due to the uncertainties discussed above.

The substantial uncertainties currently present in the quantitative assessment of large - scale surface temperature changes prior to about A.D. 1600 lower our confidence in this conclusion compared to the high level of confidence we place in the Little Ice Age cooling and 20th century warming.»

Even if you are hunting down your dates by utilizing Jewish online dating services or a personalized Jewish matchmaker, you should keep in mind that everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) likes a little bit of a chase at the beginning of a relationship - a little bit of uncertainty about how the other person feels about you - a little bit of missing that person — a little bit of evaluating your last conversation and weighing the silence between your next one and trying to figure out if he / she really likes you.

«It's surprising,» he says about how politics is having so little impact on markets, «but it may simply be that people don't know how to predict what the fallout will be from all the political uncertainty.»

My idea for a guest post would be to write about some of my runs in cities around the world and what it is like to just head out and take a run in a foreign city with an iphone camera, a sense of adventure, adrenaline, excitement and a little bit of uncertainty as well.

to sow doubt and to get people to believe that due to uncertainty, scientists actually know very little about the topic.

However, there is enough remaining uncertainty about the controls on the «conveyor» that I would like a little more process understanding.

There isn't any uncertainty about what happens if we keep doing nothing or very little.

And the list of uncertainties grows as we learn more about the things we know very little about.

The dirty little secret in many environmental matters is that there is deep uncertainty about how human actions will affect the environment and proof one way or the other is illusive.

They wrote (as quoted by you): «But given how little is known about either the climate's sensitivity to greenhouse - gas emissions or about future emissions levels,...» The use of the word «either» makes it very clear that The Economist knows that uncertainty about climate sensitivity is * not * the same thing as (or «equal to») uncertainty about emissions.

You are a time waster Eric — an odd little person putting words in my mouth interested only in trivial points scoring about an uncertainty that doesn't exist and making silly little statements about retarding science and similar.

On the other hand, here you have civil engineers such as Chief Hydrologist spouting off who know very little about signal processing of noisy data and the origin of the aleatory uncertainty.

While the authors note the uncertainties and limitations of contemporary climate models — particularly around the timing and intensity of impacts — there is little ambiguity about the responsibility of the oil industry.

I do admit that it can be a bit unsettling for those who feel they must be certain about what is true at all times — that they must have a stable «truth» to believe for every question — and for those with little tolerance for uncertainty.

Also, it is very clear (from the SOD) that there is little dispute about the range of the TCR, but there is still uncertainty about the long tail of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity, which (according to the SOD) is still kind of determined by an «expert consensus».

I would really like to hear the opinions of the RC regulars, both real scientists and the scientist wannabes (like me), on what date you would pick on a time line and say, «by this point we knew about the A in AGW and there was very little doubt, even if we had a lot of uncertainty about the amount of warming and interactions between various parts of the environment, and we should have started to take action to reduce our emissions».

Putting the political aspect aside, I would really like to hear the opinions of the RC regulars, both real scientists and the scientist wannabes (like me), on what date you would pick on a time line and say, «by this point we knew about the A in AGW and there was very little doubt, even if we had a lot of uncertainty about the amount of warming and interactions between various parts of the environment, and we should have started to take action to reduce our emissions».

Generally, considering that technological applications of scientific models, developed to reduce uncertainty about real - world risks, have been widely successful for making life safer and more comfortable for an increasing fraction of the world population, why is there so little trust in the judgments of scientists who generate and test such models?

After realizing the insanity and stupidity of this little war, I decided that I was only going to worry about appropriate communication of uncertainty and protecting scientific integrity.

A lot of permanent no - medical exam policies rely on as little as a health questionnaire to find out about your health, giving the insurer less information, making those policies a lot more expensive to make up for the uncertainty.

Although there is a long history of folk wisdom about uncertainty before marriage, there has been little scientific study of this issue.

So encouraging to see even with the uncertainty of «too little / too much» (which I'm ever wondering about!)