Sentences with phrase «little value return»

Kiyosaki is critical of governments; banks and public institutions as most of them are creating massive debt and stealing money out of the economy for little value return.

Not exact matches

«Several decades back, a return on equity of as little as 10 percent enabled a corporation to be classified as a «good» business — i.e., one in which a dollar reinvested in the business logically could be expected to be valued by the market at more than 100 cents.

Whether the machines are ever returned, they will be of little value to the thieves.

If they lived past their policy's maturity date, policyholders lost their coverage and received little cash value in return, since the funds had been used to pay premiums.

Fees are deducted from plan assets before investment returns — little value in our internet - driven culture of transparency.

It is arguable that sentiment indicators derive substantially from what just happened in the stock market and that they therefore add little or no value to price action itself in predicting future returns.

But I'm of the school that says, if that is proven — and it is, I think, a little bit in the marketplace — if it is proven to be the case, then people will bid up the prices of value stocks and bid down the prices of growth stocks until they reach an equilibrium and then future returns will be the same.

Even though investing in the best decile of a composite of value factors averages out to have excess returns of almost four percent annualized, when looking at shorter investment periods it only works a little better than two out of three years on a one - year basis.

They keep scrolling, deriving little value from the service beyond killing time and, Facebook research suggests, giving little in return to advertisers.

We believe that undertaking an international background check on an issuer's key stakeholders as contemplated in question 14, would impose a significant financial burden on both portal operators and issuers and provide little value in return.

These fish that the Arsenal sharks manage to rip off so well each season with little deserved value in return.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

He says HGS was getting «diminishing returns» from its investment in TIGR since Venter had steered his outfit into sequencing organisms of little medical importance, and into human genome sequencing, also of limited value for a company like HGS that is interested in genes as drug targets (not untranslated DNA that makes up most of the genome).

On the short side — After the main story and mirror levels are complete, there is very little reason to return to The Bridge, even if you are hunting for the Achievements (which, by the way, might bother a select few due to their odd point values).

Porsche sees no genuine value in COTY awards... using its marketing funds on efforts with a much higher return rather than wasting it on meaningless COTY's which offer little if any marketing value.

Those customers won't stay with you once something cheaper comes along whereas your real customers, the customers that you should value and that will value you in return, well, maybe they'd pay a little extra for Harry Potter because shopping in a proper book store makes them feel good about themselves.

Those customers won't stay with you once something cheaper comes along whereas your real customers, the customers that you should value and that will value you in return, maybe they'd pay a little extra for Harry Potter because shopping in a proper book store makes them feel good about themselves.

Last year, a little - known value fund called Dane Capital produced a return for its investors of 50.2 % net of fees and expenses by -LSB-...]

I learned a little about the Fama / French finding — that small - cap companies and «value - oriented» companies have historically offered higher returns than the overall stock market.

This can be a problem if you live past the maturity date and have used most of the cash value to pay premiums, as you can end up with no coverage and little money returned to you.

What value investor would offer up so much for so little in return, even one who loved the Mets?

Term life insurance typically has no cash value, although some ROP (return of premium) term policies may have a little cash value accumulation.

With a little analysis, you can figure out if the policy will provide a decent return, and you may even be able to figure out the minimum cash value at any given time.

There could be only small losses, but small losses that extend for far longer into the future than the wipeout would have (because it takes longer to return to fair value when you do it a little at a time).

There is a great paper coming out of a wealth management shop here in LA that deconstructs the Yale returns even further (ie adding value and small cap tilts, a little leverage, etc).

They have succeeded in returning little value (as yet!)

More likely: If no strategic buyer is found for the Sellers stake, and the shares are distributed to lots of little shareholders current management may not be pressured into returning full intrinsic value over the next couple of years (i.e. No catalyst, no efficient asset allocation).

Revisiting P / E10, Revisiting P / E10: Dividends, NFB Closed, Links Repaired, The Big Project, Calculator D, Long - Term Stock Returns, My Most Recent Articles, Dividend Calculators A and B, Dividend Growth Sensitivity Study, Three Powerful Advantages of Dividend Strategies, Calculator H, CTVR Calculator A, Dividends and Constant Terminal Value Rates, HCTVR Calculator A, May 2006 Highlights, Investment Traps, Variable Terminal Value Rate Calculator A, Variable Terminal Value Rate Calculator B, Why People Ignore Valuations, Latching Calculators, Latched Threshold Survey, Investing for Dummy — The Six «Must Know» Rules, Early Success with Latch and Hold, Continued Success with Latch and Hold, Adding Constraints to Latch and Hold, Time To Catch Up Calculator Notes through June 12, 2006 The Lower Latch and Hold Threshold, Additional Constraints with Latch and Hold, Current Research I: Latch and Hold, Dividend Investors, The Accumulation Stage, Idiot Switching, Latch and Hold Spreadsheet A, Typical Values of P / E10, Growth with Switching, Special Note about Mean Reversion, No New Discovery This Time, Looking a Little Bit Harder, The Stock - Return Predictor, Calculator I. Notes starting June 13, 2006.

Ultimately, we care little about growth / value styles and focus on market - beating returns with high active share, low tracking error, and low turnover.

I added valuation metrics to the momentum regressions for one month and one year returns and found they were of little value.

Last year, a little - known value fund called Dane Capital produced a return for its investors of 50.2 % net of fees and expenses by investing in unloved small - cap stocks.

To return to a concept I discussed in the first column I wrote for RealMoney, Valuing Financial Slack in the Steel Sector, banks with a high degree of leverage relative to the overall riskiness of their assets and liabilities possess little in the way of financial slack.

People who adopt pets at free adoption events value their pets exactly as much as those who paid a fee, and they also return them to the shelter or rescue group at exactly the same rate, or even a little less.

I stayed at the Grosvenor House Hotel a few years ago and enjoyed its location near the Dubai Marina so, now that award nights can be booked there for as little as 12,000 points per night, I can definitely see myself returning — that»; s pretty good value... especially if you have SPG Platinum status.

Unfortunately, many lawyers get taken advantage of and pay someone who provides little value in return.

If you were to give up your policy (something we will assess a little later), you would receive a portion of the cash value in return.

If they lived past their policy's maturity date, policyholders lost their coverage and received little cash value in return, since the funds had been used to pay premiums.

But if you have a fairly large cash value with consistent returns, you can keep coverage in place for years at little to no additional cost.

It is the basic time value of money scenario where the insurance company takes the extra premium and invests it over time to earn a higher return, and then pays you a little less.

Going by this, the maturity value should be a little over Rs 28 lakh — amounting to an extra return of around Rs 3.5 lakh.

A variable universal life insurance contract may be attractive to those clients willing to bear a little extra risk in their life insurance contract for the opportunity to have a higher cash value, over time, with market rate returns.

Term life insurance typically has no cash value, although some ROP (return of premium) term policies may have a little cash value accumulation.

Assuming there's a fairly large cash value, and consistent returns, you both keep your coverage in place for years and incur little to no additional cost.

They keep scrolling, deriving little value from the service beyond killing time and, Facebook research suggests, giving little in return to advertisers.

The end result is little to no value for the end user over fiat currency (for day to day use) and in return, the loyalty you get from the user will be superficial in nature.

Critical analyzation of tax returns, financial statements, and calculated debt to income ratios, loan to value and other data required to successfully underwrite — working with little to no supervision.

The high price / low cap rate environment is also pushing investors to look for bigger returns in new development deals, value - add acquisitions and properties in secondary markets, such as Raleigh, N.C., Charleston, S.C. and Tampa, Fla. «What we really see is value - add picking up, because with minimal capital you can get a property up and going and get a little bit higher rental rate and a better ROI than you can by putting a shovel in the ground and waiting 19 to 36 months to see it come to fruition,» says Ressler.

In some cases where the value - add component is a high vacancy rate, the strategy may require investors to accept more risk with little or no dividends in the beginning in exchange for a larger return later.

The sale of these businesses without the guarantee would return little or no value to the U.S. Treasury and to taxpayers.