Not exact matches
the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the
apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and
living as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...
It only clarifies that what the
apostles had written and testified about Jesus
as Son of God,
as God, and
as one who had died for the sins of mankind, who was raised to
life and will return literally in this world in their writings ARE ALL FALSE TESTIMONIES about Jesus, which means the
apostles had presented to us a false «Jesus», for Jesus still says in Rev. 22:16 that he will send an «angel» or messenger to testify about him (Jesus).
Wonderful teacher... get out your Bible and start reading... this guy is a wolf in sheep's clothing leading millions to an eternity in hell... the prosperity gospel he teaches is contrary to the teachings of Christ... Christ talked about abundance in
life but he was speaking of spiritual abundance not material things... Scripture and Christ said in this
life you will have trouble... Christ suffered in this
life as did each of his
Apostles... open your eyes before it is too late for you.
As I looked out over the 180 people taking New Testament interpretation, I saw folk who had never been to church in their
lives, and for whom the YDS chapel was their first parish; who certainly did not know the Nicene Creed and probably not the
Apostles» Creed.
while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of
life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person should be put to death,
as far
as jesus and the
apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.
Though this is not meant to imply that an educated layman ought not also sometimes have the courage, in the right place and in the right manner, to give an account of the hope that is in him and,
as the
apostle says, is active in his
life.
Whereas Paul described his former
life in Judaism
as focused on human relationships with his contemporaries and predecessors, his depiction of his new
life is so centered on his relation to God that he
as yet has no relationship to the other
apostles.
What is happening here, for the first time in two thousand years, for the first time since the
apostle Paul pondered the continuing «mystery» of
Living Judaism, for the first time since the Church condemned Marcion
as a heretic in the second century, for the first time since so many things in our tortuously entangled relationship, is that believing Jews and Christians are encountering one another on a footing of civil equality in a shared exploration of the way through history of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus.
The majority of the communions represented hold to the Nicene and
Apostles» creeds; others, such
as Baptists, Congregationalists and Disciples, recognize these
as witnesses in past generations, but do not hold them in the same reverence, emphasizing instead a personal faith in the
living God through the
living Christ.
These writings have their being,
as they had their origin, within the
life of a community which traces its descent from Abraham and Moses, from prophets and
apostles, and plays its part in the history of our own time; and the Scriptures not only recall its past, but serve the needs of its day - to - day existence in the present.
It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony
as to what the
apostles taught about the Christian
life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own
life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by
apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the
apostles themselves.
In fact one (of many) miscues in the gospels is when Jesus is claimed to have ordered his
apostles to «take up the cross» — the cross would not have had meaning to Jesus when he was
living... unless of course... oh right... the cross had been around
as a religious symbol for thousands of years... oops.
The parables, sayings, and anecdotes from the
life of Jesus were used
as «paradigms,» illustrations, exempla in the early Christian preaching and teaching, rather than
as quotations from a finished and complete biography, based perhaps upon the memoir of an
apostle.
There are those that will mock and ridicule people of faith but Jesus told us that they will do to us what they did to him so it should come
as no big surprise even the disciples and
apostle and one point in their
lives either didn't believe or persecuted people who did believe until their eyes were opened this is nothing new.
We, too, are
living at the end of the story; we —
as were the
apostles — are engaged in the second, christotelic reading by virtue of our eschatological moment, the last days, the inauguration of the eschaton.
Studying the Bible in his cell, he was struggling to understand what the
apostle Paul meant in his letter to the Romans: «For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed — a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just
as it is written: «The righteous will
live by faith»» (1:17).
And so on the day called Sunday, there is an assembly in one place of all who
live in the cities or in the country; the memorial of the
apostles or the writings of the prophets are read
as long
as time allows.
There were those in Corinth who challenged his credentials
as an
apostle, mainly because there was no evidence in his
life and ministry of power to perform miracles.
For all their conviction of
living in an age of miracle, the
apostles found themselves
living in a world which went on its course, outside the limits of the Christian community, much
as it had always done.
I can not see how the reading of Rom 7 would suggest the normal Christian experience, especially interpretetd
as descriptive of the persnal experience of the
life of the
apostle Paul.
Following Bonhoeffer's exposition of the Sermon on the Mount, he gives an exposition of Matthew 9:35 - 10:42.39 Short vignettes are drawn of the harvest (the people are without a shepherd, without relief, deliverance, and forgiveness) for which one must pray for laborers; the call of the
apostles (who are given power stronger than Satan's and are bound together only by their choice and call); the work (fulfilling their commission to preach, traveling
as messengers of the King,
living in «royal poverty,» warning men of the urgency of the times); the suffering of the messengers (
as Jesus was persecuted so the messengers will be, but they are forewarned; because Christ will return the disciples are not to fear man, or to be gullible in thinking that «there is good in every man «40); the decision (man's eternal destiny is determined by his decision on earth for the devil or for Christ); and the fruit (the disciples are fellow workers having
as their goal the «salvation of the Church»).41
I keep returning to the
apostle Paul's words, «if possible,
as far
as it depends on you,
live peaceably with all men.»
The church is organized on the same principles
as the original and ancient church of Jesus Christ on the foundation of
living apostles and prophets and with priesthood authority from God.
The local situation is filled out in some detail; and in the course of this report, the more moving because unintended, the
apostle discloses the mature stance of a man «in Christ»
as he
lives out his obedience in the midst of envy, rivalry, misunderstanding, and considerable interparty slugging.
And of course, most congregations take it
as unanimous in the New Testament that Mary and Joseph
lived in Nazareth before Jesus was born (contra Matthew), there was at Jesus» baptism a public announcement from heaven
as to his divinity (contra Mark and Luke), Jesus was rejected in his home town because he was a familiar local figure (contra Luke), Peter was the foremost
apostle (contra John), and Judas hanged himself (contra Luke, in Acts)
The
apostles had a special status
as long
as they
lived, because they had known the Lord personally.
A converted church in a corrupt civilization withdraws to its upper rooms, into monasteries and conventicles; it issues forth from these in the aggressive evangelism of
apostles, monks and friars, circuit riders and missionaries; it relaxes its rigorism
as it discerns signs of repentance and faith; it enters into inevitable alliance with converted emperors and governors, philosophers and artists, merchants and entrepreneurs, and begins to
live at peace in the culture they produce under the stimulus of their faith; when faith loses its force,
as generation follows generation, discipline is relaxed, repentance grows formal, corruption enters with idolatry, and the church, tied to the culture which it sponsored, suffers corruption with it.
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of
living, the human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in
as much
as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the
apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's right, not ever not any human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.
It is noteworthy that here and in other passages the encyclical refers not simply to the present state of the teaching of the Catholic Church but to the tradition of the
apostles as still taught and
lived in the Church today.
Other events in Jesus»
life, such
as his circumcision or transfiguration are remembered on special days,
as are the
apostles and evangelists and other saints and martyrs.
This gospel invitation is what Jesus consistently used (
as did Peter, Paul, and the other
apostles) to invite non-believers to receive eternal
life from Jesus.
To see the universe
as a whole in this way, with the same God working in the universe at large, and in the
life of Jesus, and in the
lives of all of us, was put in highly symbolic language by the
apostle Paul in his letter about the «Cosmic Christ» in Colossians 1.
«Such an approach seems foreign to the unconditional commitment that is demanded of authentic believers,» he writes, «a commitment that is described by the
apostle Paul
as one that involves becoming a
living sacrifice.
As the apostle Paul said when you live as Christ you are one with Go
As the
apostle Paul said when you
live as Christ you are one with Go
as Christ you are one with God.
We could say he has a spiritual body in heaven, transcending space - time, but this spiritual body was present to the
apostles as a finite
living human body in space - time.
But that is all we get except for a reference to Vatican I. Congar, for most of his
life, saw the papacy
as ultimately derived from the College of bishops
as successors of the
apostles and was reluctant to use the term Vicar of Christ.
An air of expectancy and of imminent cosmic change pervades the New Testament, even
as the
apostles go out to proclaim the events of the
life, death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
They said that women and laymen could preach, that the Church of Rome, being corrupt, was not the head of the Catholic Church, that only priests and bishops who
lived as did the
Apostles were to be obeyed, that prayers for the dead were useless, that sacraments administered by unworthy clergy were of no effect, that taking
life is against God's law, that every lie is a deadly sin, and that oaths,
as in courts, are clearly contrary to Christ's command.
From the monasteries many went forth, some
as individuals to
live as hermits, and others in groups, often of twelve with a leader in imitation of the
Apostles and Christ.
Everywhere (And such is now the case almost everywhere in Christendom, which,
as it seems, either entirely ignores the fact that Christ Himself it is who so frequently and with such heartfelt emphasis warned against offense, even at the end of His
life, and even when He addressed His faithful
Apostles who had followed Him from the beginning and for His sake had forsaken all — or maybe silently regards this
as an extravagant apprehension on the part of Christ, inasmuch
as the experience of thousands and thousands proves that one can have faith in Christ without having noticed the least trace of the possibility of offense.
Perhaps
as a result of the unsettlement and chaos that accompanied the Jewish rebellion against Rome the evangelist left Palestine for Asia, where he later wrote the gospel, while John was still alive in Palestine, partly from recollections of what the
apostle had said or written, but largely from his wider knowledge of traditions about Jesus and his teaching, and in the light of his own interpretation of the teaching and of the significance of the facts of Jesus»
life.
In the midst of the jealous rivalry of the
apostles, He reveals to them that He has come «not to be served but to serve and to give His
life as a ransom for many» (Mark 10:45).
Paul, of course, did not have the complete New Testament
as we have it today... in fact,
as he was writing this letter, he was writing part of this first foundation, but he knew of other letters and accounts of the
life of Christ that were written by other
apostles, and so he mentions them here
as foundation number 1.
In Peter's brief exhortation some theological implications should arrest our attention
as evidence of what had already become the convictions of the
apostles and were through their teachings to become guiding principles in the
life of the primitive church.
Between 1962 and his death in 1977, Rossellini was to make forty - two hours of historical films, treating topics
as diverse
as the Acts of the
Apostles and the
life of the seventeenth - century French philosopher Descartes, and at his death he was working on further historical projects, including one on Marx.