I know we can not
live by bread alone but it certainly is one of my favorite foods....
«But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God (Matt.
Man, we know, can not
live by bread alone but hang me if I don't believe that some women could live by love alone.
But man - especially a gluten sensitive one - can not
live by bread and football alone.
Malcolm Forbes, editor - publisher of Forbes magazine, prefers peanut butter and bacon sandwiches, and Bill Cosby «s motto is «Man can not
live by bread alone.
But remember man shall not
live by bread alone, hence in the midst of world problems, we need to keep what gives us joy.
After all, Man does not
live by bread alone.
But man - especially a gluten sensitive one - can not
live by bread and football alone.
When someone said, «Man can not
live by bread alone» I must have not heard it... I love it so much, it's almost sinful...: (I don't make it often... homemade, hot bread, with butter, makes me go into a trance... I'd do almost ANYthing for it... * shameful... Now, a quick question for you..
Jesus counters with a verse from scripture: «One does not
live by bread alone.»
There is a New York of music, where are some people who know that man can not
live by bread alone.
The man who declared that people do not
live by bread alone also said that he could provide food and drink of a sort that would alleviate hunger and thirst forever.
Since Communism is essentially an earthbound and spirit - denying creed, and since man has never been able to
live by bread alone, I believe it quite reasonable to hope that there will be a reaction from regimented materialism.
Man now seeks to love, not merely to live: «Man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God».
So who is it who understands — really understands — that we don't
live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God?
Finally, fasting teaches us that we do not
live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord.
Jesus» retort to the devil is a good place to begin: He [God] humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your fathers had known, to teach you that man does not
live by bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of God....
Is he not capable of feeding in this way the world's 3 billion human beings, who
live by bread but «not by bread alone»?
trust only in the Word «Man shall not
live by bread alone but by every Word which comes from the mouth of God» All other «bibles» are inspired by some spirit, it is just not the spirit of God.
Luk 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word of God.
/ 4 / But he answered, «It is written, «One does not
live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.»»
We do not
live by bread alone but by the love, compassion and goodwill which we can show to one another.
He says, «Man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.»
In Matthew 4 He stated «Man shall not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God».
(Man does not
live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of the father).
On balance, Berger's theoretical perspective has provided a modern apologetic for the value of religion, arguing not from theological tradition but from the secular premises of social science that humans can not
live by the bread of everyday reality alone.
According to this interpretation, Weber wanted to demonstrate that people do not
live by bread alone, as it were, but are guided by the internal motivations and meanings that come from their ideas.
Is this not what Jesus meant by saying that we don't
live by bread alone?
To say it quite simply: the loaf of bread has become much bigger, thank God, but man can still realize that he does not
live by bread alone, for he has always been tempted, not only now, to think the opposite.
Man does not of course
live by bread alone; he merely continues his physical existence with some concomitant mental phenomena.
V of Essays or Counsels Civil and Moral) says also that «man doth not
live by bread only.»
Man does not
live by bread alone, that is, by means of his natural environment.
As people do not
live by bread alone, so democracy will not be created or revived simply by the turn to market economies, as important as that turn undoubtedly is.
The devil says to Jesus, «Command these stones to become bread,» and Jesus answers, «One does not
live by bread alone.»
Your body will always ask for food, but your mind is set towards God, as Jesus said when he was tempted «man does not
live by bread itself but by the words from god» You could fast the whole day just by drinking water.
Not exact matches
And as though that was not enough,
by attending Mass we are given something... and not just anything... we are given the opportunity to receive the
bread of
life... the body and blood of Jesus, the Son of God.
Tarwater fights the call and comes to fulfill it only
by way of the tortuous route of slowly realizing the shallowness of Rayber's rationalistic secularism and his own deep allegiance to and need for «the
bread of
life.»
If you desire publicly to confirm before the church this pledge of love,
by eating
bread and drinking wine, the
living memorial of the suffering and death of Jesus our Lord, then let each say: I desire it in the power of God.
The claim that just social structures would make charity superfluous «masks a materialist conception of man: the mistaken notion that man can
live «
by bread alone» — a notion that demeans man and ultimately disregards all that is specifically human.»
«Man» does not
live by «
bread» alone which means one does not
live by Christ's teaching alone but
by the very word of GOD, the Father of God, Christ Jesus!
nah — they believe that grocary store
bread and wine becomes the flesh and blood of a dead Jew from 2,000 years ago because a priest does some hocus - pocus over it in church of a Sunday morning; that a being reads my mind whenever I pray and intervenes to change what would otherwise be the course of history in small ways to «answer my prayers»; and that I will survive my own physical deathand
live happily ever after if I follow some rules laid down
by goat herders in Bronze Age Palestine.
He, therefore, is the true
bread (here is a shift back from flesh to
bread); unlike the manna given
by Moses, whoever eats this new
bread shall be united with Christ and shall therefore «
live.»
What do our
lives look like when they're sustained
by the
bread of
life?
They are upset at His claims of being the
bread of
life and he responds
by saying that no one can come to Him unless drawn
by the Father.
This defense of the accuracy of the Fourth Gospel in reporting the words of Jesus is undertaken, in spite of what must appear to the disinterested student insuperable obstacles, because to these lovers of the Gospel the alternative seems to be surrendering the authenticity of some of the most precious and manifestly true of Christ's reported words: «I am the
bread of
life... I am the light of the world... I am the good shepherd... If you continue in my words... you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free... He that drinketh of this water shall thirst again, but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst... I am the resurrection and the
life; he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he
live... I am the way, the truth and the
life; no one cometh to the Father but
by me»... and many more.
He is, and He always was the
Life of their spiritual being, and
by giving his whole self, Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity, under the appearances of
bread and wine, He gave his whole being which is quickened
by his Divinity, to be the nourishment and growth in wisdom and goodness of us his people.
The stories of Jesus were the material things and moments of our
lives:
bread, wheat, weddings, parties, work, all of it blessed
by his very embrace and presence within them.
New Delhi said: «[This unity] is being made visible as all in each place who are baptized into Jesus Christ and confess him as Lord and Savior are brought
by the Holy Spirit into one fully committed fellowship, holding the one apostolic faith, preaching the one gospel, breaking the one
bread, joining in common prayer, and having a corporate
life reaching out in witness and service to all and who at the same time are united with the whole Christian fellowship in all places and all ages, in such wise that ministry and members are accepted
by all, and that all can act and speak together as occasion requires for the tasks to which God calls His people.»
One of the letter — writers was prompted
by my article to reflect bitterly that «the French people, dying for lack of the
Bread of
Life, have been offered instead of
bread, stones, if not serpents».
In the sharing of Christian experience and mutual reinforcement in the faith the idea has affinities with the Methodist class meetings of an earlier day; and when the cell principle is integrated sufficiently with the rest of
life, it reminds one of those early Christian groups who «day
by day, attending the temple together and breaking
bread in their homes,... partook of food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people.»