Sentences with phrase «live by precedents»

Not exact matches

They're exciting and all, but, by acting as if early faith lives were not faith lives at all, an unrealistic precedent is being set for new Christians, especially.

Trustee Jeffrey Braiman said he didn't want to set a precedent for public sites — «for example, a park, and any people living by that park saying, «We want a ban.»»

According to Salis, whose position follows a recent quit notice order given to Igbos living in the North by a coalition of Arewa youths, the agitation for secession by the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra and other ethnic nationalities in Nigeria will reduce drastically once equity and justice take precedent over ethnic domination.

Yes, it's true nobody is listening to Labour now: that's no surprise when the country is rocked by the greatest financial crisis since the 1930s and a political scandal without precedent in living memory.

An appeals court sets a precedent by giving an ape legal rights to life, liberty and freedom from harm

One caveat is that actually, the untreated mice lived a little bit shorter than they «should» have by historical precedent, and the treated mice only lived as long as they «should.»

That the accompanying 7.1 DTS - HD MA track fails to live up to the precedent set not only by the video transfer but also by Deep Red's soundtrack is somewhat surprising, considering Inferno, unlike Deep Red, was originally mixed in Dolby Stereo.

At this motor show, with the booth concept of «Live Outside the Box,» Honda will propose its original mobility products generated from Honda's innovative inspirations unbound by precedent or conventional wisdom.

oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??

However, there is only one potential — and remote — precedent for such a claim, namely the short lived United Arab Republic, and a closer examination illustrates that it could not be applied by analogy to Scotland.

The April 2015 district court ruling concerning Warner Chilcott's Doryx ® was affirmed by the Third Circuit in September 2016, creating an important precedent, particularly in the life sciences sector, for companies facing these challenges globally.

Affleck also spent time tackling the privacy concern by presenting a historical chronology of privacy policy development and relevant case precedent, ending with a 2012 quote from U.S. President Barack Obama: «One thing should be clear, even though we live in a world in which we share personal information more freely than in the past, we must reject the conclusion that privacy is an outmoded value.