I don't fear any «invisible man in the sky» who hasn't produced one credible, empirically based instance of his existence in over 3,000 years What is needed is for people to stop
living by the rules of myth and mysticism and start living by the realities of the here and now
And when I live by faith — I choose to follow Jesus from my heart — not just
live by rules of my mind or what should be done.
Then I was invited to visit a monastery of Camaldolese Benedictine monks who
live by the Rule of St. Benedict and the Brief Rule of St. Romuald, a tenth - century Italian known as the «father of reasonable hermits.»
If believing in the Bible and
living by the rules of the church brings you enlightenment, that's wonderful.
Yes, she agreed to
live by the rules of the HOA.
If you want to live in the world and not according to God's Word, then
live by the rules of the world and stop trying to make everyone accept your worldly choices.
In this age of moral relativity, when relationships seem to be so easily trivialized and the impoverishment of other people is so easily neglected, it seems necessary to hear the Word of God from James, who chastises us for not
living by the rules of right conduct.
There are an awful lot of religious people that feel everyone should have to
live by the rules of their version of religion.
Living by the rule of Leviticus 19, we point to a God whose justice is ruled by love, who makes provision for the poor and will not allow the disabled to be disadvantaged.
I live by the rules of heart and commands of the soul and I don't know for better... No matter how many times I get «screwed» over for giving too much, loving too much and feeling everything so deeply... I end up hurt and upset quite many times, but I can't live differently... I can't «harden» my heart, be more thougher, distance myself from who I am by birth.
We live by the rules of sustainability and economy, which is why we're huge fans of utilizing everyday makeup in new and exciting ways for costume makeup — no need to spend extra money on potentially hazardous, one - time - use products when you can use what you've got!
Along the drive they encounter a commune full of colorful characters that invite them in but expect them to
live by their rules of peace and free love.
She advised
living by the Rule of Three — a three - member team means each team has three relationships being negotiated.
Or do
you live by the rule of thumb that if someone says it, it must be true?
While dogs seem to offer their people love and friendship almost immediately, learning how to
live by the rules of a human household does not always come so easily
Not exact matches
AGT host Nick Cannon was so moved
by her performance that he broke the
rule allowing only one golden buzzer push per judge, a move that releases streams
of golden confetti and sends the contestant straight to the
live shows.
And it's a good
rule to
live by, especially if you haven't heard
of Suitsupply.
I have a couple
of rules of thumb that I would
live by which I think are very helpful as you're doing that planning.
A beneficiary who is subject to the
life expectancy option but failed to withdraw RMD amounts
by the applicable deadline may receive an automatic waiver
of the penalty
by withdrawing the total balance
of the inherited account
by Dec. 31
of the fifth year that follows the year the retirement account owner died (the five - year
rule).
My poor dad, my biological father, struggled financially his entire
life playing
by the old
rules of money.
But the «yes» part comes from reminding yourself that there are a few basic
rules you can
live by in terms
of how you interact with others, and if you keep these absolute essentials in mind, things will go a lot easier for you — and be a lot easier on those employees
of yours who are, in many respects, very much at your mercy.
Let's now take a look at a list
of five essential leadership communication skills - or
rules, or logic, or whatever we wish to call these — to
live by.
He goes
by the 80:20
rule, which suggests that you
live off
of 80 percent
of your paycheck and save the rest.
Author: A
Life Well Played: My Stories, 2106; Arnold Palmer: Memories, Stories, and Memorabilia from a
Life on and Off the Course, 2004; Playing
by the
Rules: All the
Rules of the Game, Complete with Memorable Rulings From Golf's Rich History, 2002; A Golfer's Life (with James Dodson), 1999; 495 Golf Lessons, 1973; Play Great Golf, 1987; Arnold Palmer's Complete Book Of Putting (with Peter Dobereiner), 1986; Arnold Palmer's Best 54 Golf Holes (with Bob Drum), 1977; Go For Broke: My Philosophy of Winning Golf (with William Barry Furlong), 1973; Situation Golf (with Jesus Gutierrez), 1970; My Game and Yours, 19
of the Game, Complete with Memorable
Rulings From Golf's Rich History, 2002; A Golfer's
Life (with James Dodson), 1999; 495 Golf Lessons, 1973; Play Great Golf, 1987; Arnold Palmer's Complete Book
Of Putting (with Peter Dobereiner), 1986; Arnold Palmer's Best 54 Golf Holes (with Bob Drum), 1977; Go For Broke: My Philosophy of Winning Golf (with William Barry Furlong), 1973; Situation Golf (with Jesus Gutierrez), 1970; My Game and Yours, 19
Of Putting (with Peter Dobereiner), 1986; Arnold Palmer's Best 54 Golf Holes (with Bob Drum), 1977; Go For Broke: My Philosophy
of Winning Golf (with William Barry Furlong), 1973; Situation Golf (with Jesus Gutierrez), 1970; My Game and Yours, 19
of Winning Golf (with William Barry Furlong), 1973; Situation Golf (with Jesus Gutierrez), 1970; My Game and Yours, 1963
The tax reform bill they are pushing through the Senate will
live and die
by a complicated
rule — known as the «Byrd Rule,» a condition of the «budget reconciliation» process that allows Republicans to pass legislation with only 51 votes in the Sen
rule — known as the «Byrd
Rule,» a condition of the «budget reconciliation» process that allows Republicans to pass legislation with only 51 votes in the Sen
Rule,» a condition
of the «budget reconciliation» process that allows Republicans to pass legislation with only 51 votes in the Senate.
Financial industry norms and academic theories — even popular beliefs — have always assumed assets saved for retirement would be systematically withdrawn — following the «4 %
rule» or some other
rule of thumb or system —
by retirees in order to maintain a consistent standard
of living.
Or, you can make the
rule adaptive
by phase
of life cycle.
«At one point I recognized that Warren Buffett, though he had every advantage in learning from Ben Graham, did not copy Ben Graham, but rather set out on his own path, and ran money his way,
by his own
rules...» I have just quickly glanced at Bronte Capital's blog post, but I am sure Todd Combs and Ted Weschler were not hired because they
lived and died
by Buffet's word but rather because they manifested the teachings
of value investing in their own styles.
While it would be difficult to take a lack
of fresh credit strains as evidence
of restored health in the banking and lending system, we can't
rule out the possibility that the Rube Goldberg machine created
by the Fed and the Treasury will be enough to take us through a period
of years (or if we follow Japan's example, decades) where we will gradually bury the losses
of the banking system, trading a short -
lived period
of adjustment instead for a long - term period
of stagnant credit.
Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations
of Islam, Judaism and Christianity
by the teenagers and the other, «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» will quickly converge these religions into some simple
rules of life.
man decided to do what he wanted to do rather than
live a
life taken care
of by breaking the one and only
rule that was given.
If a group
of people choose to
live by a certain set
of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.
Live by your atheist
rules and start explaining to your loved ones the lack
of metaphysical or spiritual definition to your love.
What did the revolts brought to the people in those countries any thing other than continuos unending revolts and demonstrations scarcity
of essential commodities and products adding to the sky high prices... While other essential needs such as electricity power supply, water, gas, diesel, petrol are being used as a pressure tool
by the opposition or the
ruling party to keep people mad on the streets rather than going home seeing to their daily
living making and minding their own businesses... but what business will continue with such chaos and disorder...?
On the other hand, a
life ruled by passion is equally inhuman — it reduces man to the level
of a beast.
It is about time women take back control over their
lives instead
of bowing down to religion that are
ruled by men who want women to be second class citizens
of the world.
The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind
rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain
rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial
rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain
rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others»
lives,» «long for a monolithic body
of doctrine guarded
by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply
by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»
I would rather cultivate a strong intuitive sence
of judgment and understand the root
of morals from within that to
live by a very limited and conflicted set
of rules such as in the KUran or Bible and never cultivate a good sense
of judjment or a moral sense.
Just
by hinting at the existence
of moral knowledge, Dawkins gives us reason to doubt that we actually do
live in a world
ruled by gangster genes.
Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations
of Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Paganism, and Christianity
by the «hatters», «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» will quickly converge these religions into some simple
rules of life.
If wisdom is to be ours, it must grow in us slowly like a tree — a tree
of life — and at the end
of the long growing we have its ripe fruit, sweet to the taste, which is the knowledge
of good and evil — the kind
of knowledge
by which a king may
rule well, and any
of us may govern our
lives well.
A God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one
of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter
life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his other children to earn it; who gave his angels painless
lives, yet cursed his other children with biting miseries and maladies
of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths Golden
Rules and forgiveness multiplied
by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths morals to other people, and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead
of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!
For the vast majority
of atheists I've talked to, all that they know is that they don't like the
rules that Christians are told to
live by.
If we follow our sinful flesh and
live according to its
rules, we are trapped
by the gates
of hell.
Why not establish a humanist set
of rules we can all
live by and call it a day?
They feel they can
live by a certain unknown set
of rules.
There are lots
of rules in
life, the law
of the land, doctor's orders, guidelines laid down
by management at work, professional ethics, etc..
The rest
of the time, the average Christian can do pretty well in their
life simply
by following a few generally accepted spiritual heath
rules:
We do not have to
live by all
of the
rules in the Bible, such as the ones in the Old Testament.
Many who hated Scalia's
rulings could not help but be entertained
by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision
of us unelected,
life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested
by following»» the Court's
rulings obediently).