Christian religions
live by their dogma, which by definition means they pick and choose what they want to believe from the Bible.
Not exact matches
Don't be trapped
by dogma — which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma, which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
The ethics and compassion and example that Christ
lived by and was killed for, or do you believe more in the
dogma, and doctrines of your «faith»?
I think a combination of Christianity (micro: this
life time) and Hinduism (Macro-scale) is the best for humankind as both religions, despite their
dogmas and some imperfections,
by and large are most tolerant.
Fundamentalism uses the culture, rituals, sacraments, texts, language, and metaphors and allusions and symbols (verbal, visual, musical, etc.) of religion in blind adherence to a
dogma as defined and interpreted
by a person or group who is self - aggregating and self - justifying raw personal power for the sole purpose of controlling the
lives of others.
If your so - called «faith» is so strong and «protects» you from all of your perceived «dangers of evil», then WHY are you so afraid of people who have simply decided to
live a
life guided
by REASON instead of a
life guided
by contrived
dogma and ancient mythology?
If you find the true Mystics in every tradition who
lived in that state of Divine awareness, You will find that they were free and natural and not bound
by the
dogma and scriptures.
Reasons given
by Unitarian Universalists there for leaving other churches were along the line of «couldn't believe
dogma, but wanted community» (ex-Methodist), «could not accept Jesus myth» (nominal Episcopalian), «my wife and I could not reconcile the Christian theology with a rational approach to
life» (nominal Presbyterian).
This guy somewhat confused about the relationship between a person and god / the universal
life force, and the relationship between the individual and the religion / corporate structure which earns it's
living by peddling dated
dogma and reassurances that it's way is the right way to deal with the universe.
According to Alan Miller, there seem to be three types of people: organized religionists whose deep quest for spiritual fulfillment is satisfied
by mindlessly memorizing their creed's
dogma and putting all doubts aside; athiests who completely reject any spiritual aspect to
life whatsoever; and a gaggle of wishy - washy slackers who have copped out
by not defining themselves
by either of these rigid and self - certain camps.
This is the scarcely questioned and surprising result today of an enquiry which for almost two hundred years has devoted prodigious and
by no means fruitless effort to regain and expound the
life of the historical Jesus, freed from all embellishment
by dogma and doctrine.»
Is the church composed only of those who call themselves Christians, or followers of Jesus, and who accept a certain
dogma; or does it consist of those who dwell in the Spirit,
by whatever religion or label they identify themselves, those who
live according to the principle of love for one's fellow man, and of recognizing the holy spirit within each?
Robert, it is partly because believer idiots such as yourself also get to vote and impact the laws that the rest of us have to
live by, and you are influenced
by your absurd religio -
dogma.
If a man must say that he can not find God in the reality of his own present
life, and if he would compensate for this
by the thought that God is nevertheless the final cause of all that happens, then his belief in God will be a theoretical speculation or a
dogma; and however great the force with which he clings to this belief, it will not be true faith, for faith can be only the recognition of the activity of God in his own
life.
Doctrine are those human lessons we've learned over time trying to
live under
Dogma, and are usually about the mistakes made along the way (doctrine only develops
by human actions that caused additional suffering that didn't need to happen - doctrine is about teaching you NOT to do those things).
Don't be trapped
by dogma - which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma — which is
living with the results of other...
I do this for a
living, in the past two years I've been writing about sustainability I have studied the circular story behind every single product I use, subscribing to no single
dogma as I don't want to be blinded
by ideals.
Don't be trapped
by dogma - which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
That may well be the case, but, to these eyes, The Tree of
Life remains an open, porous, searching work, unmistakably rooted in the tradition of religious art, and yet unbound
by any one particular
dogma.
Don't be trapped
by dogma - which is
living with the results of other people's...
Steve jobs once said «Don't be trapped
by dogma which is
living with the results of other people's thinking» and i think it applies to value investing world as well.
Don't be trapped
by dogma — which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
Don't be trapped
by dogma, which is
living with the results of other people's thinking.
Boucher introduces Lotto as «an outlier in Italian Renaissance art, a portrait painter capable of capturing the soul on canvas, a man whose religious art struck a note of sincerity in an age bound
by ritual and
dogma, a figure overshadowed in
life by Titian and Raphael and condemned to poverty and relative failure in his own day.»
United more in what they rejected than
by any real unity of approach, these artists helped propel French painting beyond the
dogmas of postwar abstraction toward a new engagement with contemporary
life — or at least that's the claim being made in this exhibition of some 100 works.
It is important to them to have a science - approved stamp to their
dogma (Western techno - civilisation has hurt mother Gaia, and it is really time that we repent from our sins and go back to a «natural» way of
life (that will be extensively described
by their prefered high priest, usually involving actions ranked more from symbolic value than effectiveness in reducing CO2.