Also includes
live discussion about the nutrient content of the recipe.
This month, we're bringing you a real highlight from our Annual Conference in Edinburgh:
a live discussion about the state of microbiome research.
With just a few days left in the offering window, Elio and Miller will join me here for
a live discussion about it on Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM Eastern.
Our live discussion about best digital marketing tips with experts Karen Leland, Jayson DeMers and Adam Kleinberg, hosted by Entrepreneur's Jason Fell.
Join
our live discussion about best digital marketing tips with experts Joanna Lord and Brian Honigman, hosted by Entrepreneur's Jason Fell.
Our live discussion about best digital marketing tips with experts Joanna Lord, Eric Siu and Brian Honigman, hosted by Entrepreneur's Jason Fell.
Join
our live discussion about best digital marketing tips with experts Jason Falls and John Jantsch, hosted by Entrepreneur's Jason Fell.
Not exact matches
That party could have a political
discussion in the kitchen or people doing keg stands in the
living room, but it's all
about that whole range of human expression.
Basically, the role of management
discussions is very similar to my outlook overall in
life — it's
about seeking out many opinions, hearing many views, testing views against your own frameworks and then making decisions once you have tested your theories and approaches.
Organizations should highlight what they offer to help employees better balance work and
life and improve their well - being, but they also need to make this
discussion about culture.
During our
discussion Monica asked me a number of questions (in addition to the questionnaire that assess your risk profile that Vanguard emails you before your call with a Vanguard Personal Advisor) not just
about my finances and tolerance for risk, but
about my
life — what did I love to do, how often did I travel, what kind of lifestyle do I want to
live in 5 and 10 years, and then finally the most important question — when would you like to retire?
If an IRA owner wants to make a large withdrawal but does not need the money for daily
living purposes, for instance, repositioning of the assets may be on the front burner, along with
discussion about withdrawal strategy in general.
Life: A story Oct. 12
about allegations of sexual harassment and abuse against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein mischaracterized the nature of
discussions around Louis C.K.'s behavior toward women.
This week, #HipNJ is featuring Matt Sweetwood — author, entrepreneur, single - father and
life coach — whose most recent project, a self - help book entitled Leader of the Pack, was recently celebrated at Till & Sprocket NYC with a stimulating
discussion about marriage, divorce, parenthood, and leadership.
And most important, as Microsoft
lived under government scrutiny, employees abandoned what had been nascent internal
discussions about crushing a young, emerging competitor — Google.
In
discussions about family income, or any income, it is crucial to know how many people are trying to
live on the income.
3) The
discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real -
life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!
On Wednesday, February 21, CNN broadcast a
live town hall
discussion, during which survivors of the Parkland, Florida, shooting took politicians and the National Rifle Association to task
about gun control.
the only important thing in
life is how we treat one an other, how we
live our
lives, dipping into religous orthodoxy and entering a
discussion about what god to pray to is nothing more then selfindulgent hokus pocus guesswork.
Use this guide in your small group, house church or class to create
discussion and convey biblical truth
about how we should
live now in light of the future reality.
tallulah: Talking to someone on their death bed
about eternal
life is a most important
discussion point.
At such a critical point in a persons's
life I would hope that there would be some
discussion about whether their soul is right with God before they die.
Many
discussions I have with my 3 teenagers
about how to
live their
lives aren't always the easiest or the ones society approves of, but they are the most moral.
Looking at this
discussion, the only question that keeps on popping up in my head is why do all these commentators really care
about how other people
live their
lives.
Listen to part 1 and part 2 of Gayle's
discussion with George Weigel
about the
life and legacy of Pope John Paul II.
Criticism can't come to grips with good poetry by talking only
about the craft of the poetry; the poems themselves draw the critic into
discussions of
life and the world.
Serendipitously, two weekends ago when he did that, it was a chapter
about how
discussions of theology need ordinary people to be involved, how well - educated and well - read and well - travelled scholars also need us low church experiential local folks talking
about how we see and experience and know God,
about how theologians are hiding in every walk of
life.
19:3 - 12) Jesus opens his teachings
about life in the kingdom of heaven with a
discussion of personal morality as it relates to sex and the use of one's sexual endowments.
All this, which is only a part of what ought to be said
about the Atonement, is not irrelevant to our
discussion; for like Professor MacKinnon, though in a rather different way, I want to lay the greatest emphasis on the decisiveness and uniqueness of the Cross and the Resurrection In both these acts of God, however, I find no inconsistency between their decisiveness and «objectivity» and the fact that they are directed towards men: the former as conveying to them the divine acceptance which is also judgement, the latter by bringing to them, in the Easter experiences, the active presence of the
living Lord.
Stephen Dingley examines an essential question, frequently raised in debates and
discussions about the nature of human
life, and why humans matter.
lord krishna is true god and jesus is his devotee... so all foolsih nris who have zero knowledge
about spirituality and god, please, stop ur stupid
discussion here, its better u use ur brain in ur material
life things... haha
This definitely added an interesting twist to my
life / small - group
discussion last night on the current series
about giving.
One would hardly expect a
discussion either of the
life or of the significance of Jesus of Nazareth in such philosophically oriented studies of nature and history, or even in what little
about human nature they have written.
If you want to have a
discussion about the deeper things in
life — love, death, aging, loneliness, joy — you are more likely to find someone game for the topic in church than elsewhere.
The «communal tensions» between the groups were «of major importance in the
life of the nation,» Herberg added, suggesting that they began non-divisive
discussions about the limits of American democracy and allowed all 96 percent of Americans who identified as Protestant, Catholic, or Jew to have some social, political, and cultural recognition in America.
Today as i was thinking
about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other
discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they
live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious
discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think
about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you
live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think
about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think
about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
Thus to talk
about «the spirit of man» was to say that human existence is not only a matter of mind and body, as we have represented this in our previous
discussion, but is also a matter of relationship, in which there is an openness to, and a sharing in, the
life of others.
Neville i mentioned those people only because the
discussion was talking
about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie
about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is
about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.
Discussions about life and death in one area influence such decisions in others.
The questions
about religion and public
life, those calling for «public»
discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public
life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!
For example there is no
discussion of the celebrated passage in book nineteen on the «compromise between human wills [of the two cities]
about the things relevant to mortal
life.»
In regards to this
discussion I don't think it's helpful to talk
about Jesus as «inclusive» if by inclusive we mean that Jesus permitted folks to follow him and remain
living in a manner that was unreflective of the way.
I know that seems simplistic, and the issues that surround us today are complex, but I think before we dive into a
discussion about living in a culture moving in a different direction than Christian views, we need to remind ourselves that God is still God, and God is still good.
The story speaks to me
about how we often get caught up in
discussions about how we ought to properly interpret the Bible, how we ought to properly think
about God, how we ought to
live the Christian
life.
In the context of a
discussion about the new
life in Christ, general teaching
about sexual purity, wise use of time, and the pleasure of praising God in song preceded a more specific
discussion of husband - wife, parent - child, and master - slave relationships.
With a few exceptions teachers and students do not engage in a denominationally restricted
discussion but participate in a Protestant and a Christian conversation or debate
about the ultimate problems of faith and
life.
We can and should debate theology and doctrine, but we must never think that we are the infallible interpreters of Scripture and determiners of people's destiny, and should also remember that doctrine, as important as it is, becomes evil when debates and
discussions about theology keep us from
living out the loving gospel in tangible ways to a hurting and dying world.
In the
discussion about the death penalty, there is the ultimate moral issue of the right to take
life, and whether even the state has this right.
I have deliberately left out of the
discussion such topics as ethics and the Christian family — although I have talked
about responsibility, both for one's own adult behavior and for helping one's children develop the essential emotional equipment with which to face
life.