A 3D model of two
live human stem cells, with colors representing the cells» various internal structures.
Not exact matches
Human Longevity has already received $ 70 million in private backing and aims to use both genomics and
stem cell therapies to allow us to
live longer, healthier
lives.
For instance, a strong resolution opposing embryonic
stem cell research, which destroys
human lives, passed with 97 percent support.
The dropping of the atomic bomb, however, and the killing of birdlife by DDT, documented by Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, introduced a new problem: the presence of totally unpredicted (and probably unpredictable) harmful effects on the environment and on
human life stemming from actions taken specifically to produce certain benefits.
As we read this history, the furor over
stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal
human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn
human life.
Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of
stem cell research that could save countless
human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.
But at the same time he repeatedly affirms the greatness and power of God; the fact, in faith, that
human life stems from God and is the gift of God; and that all that has been, is, or ever shall be is ordained of God.
Well it seems like Ivan can relax, Michael Peroski has just solved all of our problems: Proceeding from ideology - driven inquiry entails starting from an answer: «Research on
human embryonic
stem cell should be forbidden because embryos are equivalent to
human lives» and working....
When we think of all that has come from him in the impulse toward
human freedom and dignity — the challenge of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every kind of suffering, the stabilizing of the inner
lives of millions of his followers around the world, and the fostering of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the things that have
stemmed from this «penniless teacher of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder of it does not sweep over our souls.
Example in point: Opposition to embryonic
stem cell /
human cloning research: It isn't anti science to oppose treating nascent
human life like a corn crop or manufacturing embryos, anymore than it is anti science than the Animal Welfare Act the proscribes what can and can't be done in scientific research with some mammals.
Stem cells can be obtained licitly, without loss of
human life — for example, from an adult organism or from the blood of the umbilical cord at the time of birth.
Unfortunately, at this formative stage in their
lives one viewpoint is pushed to the fore on campus, and that's the opinion that euthanasia, abortion, embryonic
stem cell research and a host of other practices which strip
humans of their most fundamental right are good things.
This lack of regard for the specific praxis that Jesus deliberately espouses, which may be said to lie in the consciousness that he embodied the dynamics of kingdom,
stemmed from Banerjea's and Upadhyaya's failure to project the historical Jesus as the paradigm of
human living.
«Advancements in science and research have moved faster than the debates among politicians in Washington, D.C., and breakthroughs announced in recent years confirm the full potential of
stem cell research can be realized without the destruction of
living human embryos,» House Minority Leader John Boehner, R - Ohio, said Sunday.
Former Senator Rick Santorum (R — PA) is a strong backer of adult
stem - cell research, and opposed to embryonic
stem - cell research because he views destruction of embryos as destruction of
human life.
Innovations resulting from science, technology, engineering and mathematics (
STEM) fields have positively touched nearly every aspect of
human life.
Another is that the transplanted bits of tumor act nothing like cancers in actual
human brains, Fine and colleagues reported in 2006: Real -
life glioblastomas grow and spread and resist treatment because they contain what are called tumor
stem cells, but tumor
stem cells don't grow well in the lab, so they don't get transplanted into those mouse brains.
They and others say that the technique should satisfy people who object to
stem cell research on the grounds that it harms potential
human life.
The debate about ethics in bio and
life sciences in Germany was refueled last week: While Germany's central research funding organization, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), decided to revise its position on
human stem cell research, the German government is finally reacting to heated public debates about sensitive issues by establishing a National Ethics Commission.
On the use of embryonic
stem cell research to cure diseases: it should be shut down because it involves «the wholesale destruction of
human life».
Obtaining embryonic
stem cells through cloning would mean breeding
human life specifically for destruction.
Independently of the technical possibilities, we have to respect the ethical standpoint that the use of embryonic
stem cells means the use of
human life for other purposes.
Stem - cell research promises great changes to our
lives by providing spare parts for our bodies, so extending
human lifespan to...
Different model organisms like the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster are used for their research, aimed at decoding the principles of
stem cell control with the aim to also apply them to higher forms of
life and eventually
humans.
«Is there a limit to the number of
stem cell divisions, and does that imply that there's a limit to
human life?»
Conklin's lab at Gladstone, an independent, nonprofit
life science research organization affiliated with UC San Francisco, supplied these
human induced pluripotent
stem cells for this study.
The 2012 platform also repeats previous calls for expanding federal funding «for the
stem - cell research that now offers the greatest hope for many afflictions — with adult
stem cells, umbilical cord blood, and cells reprogrammed into pluripotent
stem cells — without the destruction of embryonic
human life.»
Vowing to veto the legislation, Bush said before the vote that the «reports give us added hope that we may one day enjoy the potential benefits of embryonic
stem cells without destroying
human life.»
But for well over a decade now, ethically contentious
human embryonic
stem cell research (hESCR) has notably failed to
live up to all its hype, with promises of miracle cures within «five to 10 years» remaining unfulfilled.
Yamanaka believed that research that inherently depended on the routine destruction of
human embryonic
life could not continue and another way to obtain pluripotent
stem cells had to be found.
Platelets generated from
human embryonic
stem cells are functional in vitro and in the microcirculation of
living mice.
Proponents of destructive
human embryonic
stem cell research have all too often been quick to dismiss ethical concerns over the commodification and destruction of
human life, concerns, they say, that represent an obstacle to the pursuit of science.
Whereas the derivation of
stem cell lines from
human embryos is subject to specific regulation by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), UK law does not distinguish between fetal tissue and other tissue from living pati
human embryos is subject to specific regulation by the
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), UK law does not distinguish between fetal tissue and other tissue from living pati
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), UK law does not distinguish between fetal tissue and other tissue from
living patients.
Cell
Stem Cell, Letter «The ability and desire to sort out and categorize
life around and within us is a central aspect of the
human experience.»
Biochemist Thomas Baldwin, president of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, in a letter to the House and Senate appropriations committees, wrote that «research using fetal tissue and embryonic
stem cells advances scientific knowledge, improves
human health, and saves
lives.»
Human pluripotent stem cells and the human embryo: Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) have opened up a previously inaccessible phase of the human life cycle
Human pluripotent
stem cells and the
human embryo: Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) have opened up a previously inaccessible phase of the human life cycle
human embryo:
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) have opened up a previously inaccessible phase of the human life cycle
Human pluripotent
stem cells (hPSC) have opened up a previously inaccessible phase of the
human life cycle
human life cycle to...
Growing new body parts, reversing paralysis, stretching the limits of the
human life span: This trailblazing
stem cell researcher believes it is all within our reach.
The collaboration leverages innovative
stem cell science from the Cedars - Sinai Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute and Emulate's
Human Emulation System, which uses Organs - on - Chips technology to re-create true - to -
life biology outside the body.
Those against
stem - cell research using
human embryos because they believe it destroys
human life are, for the most part, also against the blending of species because they believe it degrades
human life.
Obama has chosen to fund abortion overseas, clearly favors funding abortions here, and has reversed the limitations on funding of embryo - destructive
stem cell research Given these facts, it is fair to ask: what is his position on the beginning of
human life and when
human life has or acquires inherent dignity?
Those in favor of
human embryonic
stem - cell research because they believe it could save
human lives are, for the most part, also for
human - bovine embryonic
stem - cell research because they believe it could save
human lives.
The first patients to receive
human embryonic
stem cell transplants say their
lives have been transformed by the experimental procedure
During his campaign, George W. Bush said he opposed federal financing of «experimentation on embryonic
stem cells that require
live human embryos to be discarded or destroyed.»
Dr. Péault is internationally recognized principally for his work on the prospective identification and characterization of
human hematopoietic (blood)
stem cells, of which his laboratory has also deciphered the ultimate origin during embryonic
life.
In
humans, there are many different types of
stem cells that come from different places in the body or are formed at different times in our
lives.
«The development of a functional
human kidney glomerulus chip opens up an entirely new experimental path to investigate kidney biology, carry out highly personalized modeling of kidney diseases and drug toxicities, and the
stem cell - derived kidney podocytes we developed could even offer a new injectable cell therapy approach for regenerative medicine in patients with
life - threatening glomerulopathies in the future,» said Ingber.
To some people, taking
stem cells from a fetus or embryo amounts to unethical exploitation of
human life, and healing one
life does not justify destroying another.
Here, authors from Corning
Life Sciences describe dissolvable microcarriers as a scalable solution for large - scale expansion and harvest of functional
human mesenchymal
stem cells by enabling simplified downstream processing and high - yield cell recovery.
Suzuki, possibly inspired by his new job as a research scientist at the Research Unit for Organ Regeneration in Kobe, Japan, explains it this way: «Just as
humans can start over in
life, differentiated cells can also take on other fates following the generation of undifferentiated
stem cells.»
Although anti-abortion groups oppose embryonic
stem cell research because they believe it destroys unborn
human life and that it threatens to expand that destruction as
stem cell research grows increasingly beneficial to
humans already born and suffering from disease and debilitation, embryonic
stem cells now are reproduced in labs from cells derived years ago from originals.