Sentences with phrase «live object would»

The object will simulate movement in a pattern much like a live object would.

Though Pop artists did not consider themselves as being a part of a unified movement, the still life object has been of shared interest to both canonical Pop artists and lesser - known artists.

Not exact matches

All three had dedicated their lives to creating objects, and all were concerned about their ecological footprint.

My employees objected, saying we'd have to post every day to live up to the title.

«Tracking the physical location of people and assets has some critical real life applications in many industries where accurate and timely location of moving objects is crucial for achieving the best results,» explains Thomas Walle, the co-founder and CEO of Unacast, the company behind the directory.

Have some foresight and fortitude for once in your life and stop chasing shiny objects.

A survey released Tuesday from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that among Catholics who have heard about the issue, 55 % support giving religious institutions that object to birth control an exemption from the federal contraceptive rule, while 39 % oppose exempting those institutions.

Just because that something is the second brightest object in the night sky and you've probably seen it just about every single night of your entire life is no excuse for not saying something.

We live here for so many decades, I would hate to think that the truth of the object of my faith would be determined by centuries of contradictory theologies, all bringing something to the conversation, none having all the answers.

Jesus» approach to asking questions, setting up real life object lessons and telling stories in all his Hebrew - ness has been swallowed up by our Greek driven minds.

Critics such as Jürgen Habermas have objected to the way the person leading such a life stands open to domination» but that was Gadamer's point.

And this is what the Catechism teaches: The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life - forms and the appearance of man.

But, it is objected, witnesses testified that she herself would not want to live under the circumstances of these last eight years.

With the definition of religion given, Marxism would have to be considered a religion, at least for those who do not use it as a means to some political or economic end, but who find «in the conception of the «dialectic of history» with its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to life....

We who live in a world which it can truly be said to have revolutionized acknowledge its social significance — and sometimes even make it the object of a cult.

God does in fact treat us as subjects — that is as those having their own agency — but many preach a gospel in which we have been reduced to objects forced to live life in according to some divinely mapped - out and pre-ordained «plan», or to be the at the mercy of divine manipulation.

Some of them were of the bones of the hand, others of coins and keys photographed through the opaque walls of a leather pocket - book, all clearly demonstrating that he had found some strange new rays which had the amazing property of penetrating as opaque an object as the human body and revealing on a photographic plate the skeleton of a living person.

I don't object to God and the Bible being the ultimate authority in my life, just the incorporated church that has changed the facts about both of the above.

The transfer of this life to earth Many scientists have objected that the generation of life can not occur, or have occurred, outside of a planetary environment, where heavier elements are plentiful.

The physical prehension as conformal feeling, we have said, reproduces the object by assuming the subjective form of one of its prehensions, but as vector it is, and remains throughout the «life» of the subject, an essential relation to that individual object as other, as there and then.

In my case the subject has struck a new path and is not at all conscious of the duality of his act; in him life is not split into an object and subject, or into acting and acted.

There are only a few fraternities on or off campus, and fewer than a hundred students live in them, but they have been the object of allegations of sexual assault, and students and faculty have demanded that something be done.

So the point of Whitehead's example in the above passage would be that in talking about the membership of the complex structured society which is a total man, in the ordinary sense of the term, one is referring not to a subordinate society, such as the enduring object which is the life, or soul, of the man, but to all the individual actual occasions in all the subordinate societies and subordinate nexus which make up the man.

Any universe created by the multiverse generator would need to include both (a) the positive conditions necessary for life (i.e., the fine - tuned laws of nature) and (b) the negative conditions necessary for human existence (i.e., the absence of V - class objects).

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words — father, mother, spouse, parents — retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

Thus, while we do not know empirically that lower orders of reality have life and subjectivity, there is no reason to draw some arbitrary line absolutely separating living and non-living, or subjects and pure objects.

Many modern people would object to this idea, saying that most people perform all sorts of good deeds in their lives.

The existence of the most elementary social structures and the sciences of psychology and ethology suggest strongly that living occasions may indeed exhibit the structure of enduring objects that have personal order.

The gods were conceived as visual objects having excellence in themselves, an excellence that inspired interest and admiration rather than numinous terror or the expectation of interference in the practical affairs of life.

But at least one question remains as basic and elemental for us as it was for Niebuhr: Is the object of our theological inquiry the actuality of life in, with and before the living God, or have we pushed this primary reality aside?

We live in a world in which women have been devalued to the point that they must wield their bodies as objects, making themselves vulnerable, for the sake of acquiring power or influence.

In these quotations, the enduring objects and enduring persons are what we have called, in dependence on other passages in White - head's writing, living persons and souls.

Since God is for Jesus not an object of intellectual investigation, his affirmations of faith about God have not the character of universal truths, which are intellectually valid without being grounded in the actual life experience of the believer.

That the object of the Christian faith is a Reality which has an existence of its own and is not to be identified with your existence or my existence or with the world or universe in which you and I live and move and have our being.

Specific notions of deity, and of divine action, that have figured in theistic conceptual systems of long - past civilizations have certainly been influenced by then - prevailing technology — the ways in which people made their living.5 In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrote:

I can not here investigate why language in our time has become flat, nonallusive, and impoverished, but simply to observe that it has and ask what this means for our churches as they seek to recover ways of worship which shall be more adequate to the object of worship, and more fully reflective of the long history of the people of God in their life of worship.

This death, although in one sense simply an element in the life of Jesus, has always been the object of special attention, both in theology and devotion, and undoubtedly has a place of special significance in the event to which we find ourselves looking back in memory and faith.

The curriculum and the content of catechetical instruction and Christian religious education has always been an object of dynamic discussion, on whether it must be subjected to the continuing changes in social life.

There you see the way in which a life which may have been disorganized, self - centered, thoughtless, and indifferent to others finds a center in which it can discover the meaning of existence, presented in the object of affection.

If one asks the child if an object feels anything, then the child answers: No, because it is a thing and has no life» (RME 181).

On the other hand, the purpose of the classical disciplines of the life of prayer — such as postures, directing of thoughts, or devotional objects — is to provide what have proved in actual experience to be the most favorable conditions for real prayer.

... I have felt A presence that disturbs me with the joy Of elevated thoughts; a sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round ocean and the living air, And the blue sky, and in the mind of man; A motion and a spirit, that impels All thinking things, all objects of all thought, And rolls through all things.

The tendency of the technological society that puts a premium on efficiency is to treat people as objects for economic ends and not as subjects who have an urge to live.

but i have a new idea for what believers think god is... and it may actually exist and funny enough is only tested thru its effect on other objects — kinda like a black hole — the collective conscienceness of every living thing... since we all are part of the same energies and have in some form or another a conscienciness, i believe that collective is what the believers claim is god — the collective being felt and moved like any conscienceness but with the power to effect us all as we all play into it — as long as we are open to it... your thoughts?

If you are in a rubber life raft and survival of the group is paramount, then it would be completely moral to throw the guy overboard who keeps attempting to pop the raft and drown us all, and not a single other person in the raft would object for they would understand that that guy must have lost use of his senses and had abandoned his humanity.

I have some regrets in my life and I also feel great that I have this perspective because I've been the product of this and treated like an object.

If it is objected that production in and for small communities would be less efficient than large - scale centralized production, it could be answered, first, that when the true costs of transportation are calculated, this may not be true, and second, that efficiency in that sense is less important than a good life in a self - reliant community that has some control over its own destiny.

Its teachings are very, very simple: There really are free and natural markets where the optimum value of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth of all of us; governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working out of these splendid principles.

Religion is a symbol system which serves to evoke «the totality which includes subject and object and provides the context in which life and action finally have meaning».2

The objects of his study range from a class of molecules that have the basic self - duplicating property of living things, through cells which suggest purely physical systems, through animals which give increasing evidence of having minds, to human beings in whom streams of consciousness seem to involve continual choices of action, at the opposite pole from control by impersonal laws of nature.