Your child might have to spend the rest of
their lives explaining to others what their name means.
Not exact matches
People who aspire
to live in one of these
other two areas are looking at Grovenor now because it's a little more affordable,
explains Sandy Pon with Re / Max Excellence.
People who take the blame, who say they are sorry and
explain why they are sorry, who don't try
to push any of the blame back on the
other person... those are people everyone wants in their
lives, because they instantly turn a mistake into a bump in the road rather than a permanent roadblock.
«Startup
Live enables participants
to know each
other, interact, and find partners
to work with in the future,»
explains Thanos Makris, who is the co-founder of apps studio iMellon and was a participant in last year's event.
In everyday
life, this stringent threshold can lead us
to refuse
to give
other people a second chance after a negative first impression, and
explains why a well - evidenced positive impression can so readily evaporate with a single stumble.
«Often the surprises that lead
to new business ideas come from watching
other people work and
live their normal
lives,» Cook
explained.
«Some recipients would do fine with vouchers that they could use for any social services,» Olasky
explains, «but it would be irresponsible
to place unconstrained vouchers in the hands of addicts, alcoholics, and
others not committed
to changing their
lives.»
If it is right
to judge Islam as a whole on the basis of the barbarism of jihadi groups, how should we
explain — and encourage — the actions of Kurdish Muslims and many
other Muslims who are standing up
to the jihadists and paying with their
lives to protect Christian and Yazidi minorities in Iraq?
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans
to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related
to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast
to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and
other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets,
life itself and us.
It does nt
explain his origins, substance, or much more,
other than his character, motive and goal, asside from moral laws, codes of conduct, right from wrong, and how
to manage
life, all while believing in him.
Faith on the
other hand is an entirely human process by which you seek
to explain lifes mysteries and pain.
The theist, on the
other hand, it quite smugly certain that he has all teh answers
to life, the universe and everything
explained neatly in a single book and reacts with hostility and derision when anyone refutes the contents of said book.
it reminds me the way Michael Frost (and many
others in
other words, like NT Wright, Bonhoeffer, and even Ellul)
explain the kingdom of God as being some kind of a «trailer» for the Kingdom that is coming, and christians would be already
living the the Kingdom reality right here in this world, where it seems
to the eye that there is no kingdom of God at all.
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have
to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have
to be
explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given
to us by God...
to better the
life of
other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going
to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»
To think that this is one way of organizing thought, life, and feeling alongside other ways, that it is true for those who live by it but not for others, undercuts the zeal to explain to others the situation in which they objectively exist whether or not they have previously recognized i
To think that this is one way of organizing thought,
life, and feeling alongside
other ways, that it is true for those who
live by it but not for
others, undercuts the zeal
to explain to others the situation in which they objectively exist whether or not they have previously recognized i
to explain to others the situation in which they objectively exist whether or not they have previously recognized i
to others the situation in which they objectively exist whether or not they have previously recognized it.
(I apologize
to those that dislike metaphors, but I almost can't communicate if I don't get
to use them, and as insufficient as they at times are, they are very close
to the language of what I believe, because you can't really
explain or define someone into believing... you can only
live out your beliefs in a way that you share with
others, and when given the opportunity shine a light, or point a direction, or walk along with someone for a bit).
Other scientists have invoked an «anthropic principle»
to explain the whole succession of improbabilities apart from which human
life could not have emerged.
Or put in
other terms, is the current methodological ideal of scientific atomism sufficiently broad
to explain life and mind as we experience them?
I can not
explain what happened in my
life without speaking of the
others who contributed
to it.
He goes on
to explain the striking choice of vocabulary: «I use the word as cooks do,
to mean the extending and amplifying of a dish with
other, complementary elements... One can not
live on essences» (p. 314).
Practice in telling and hearing each
other has the effect of improving their ability
to explain the difference that being a Christian makes in their
lives.
To warrant this radical revision — one might almost say reversal — of the Catholic tradition, Father Concetti and others explain that the Church from biblical times until our own day has failed to perceive the true significance of the image of God in man, which implies that even the terrestrial life of each individual person is sacred and inviolabl
To warrant this radical revision — one might almost say reversal — of the Catholic tradition, Father Concetti and
others explain that the Church from biblical times until our own day has failed
to perceive the true significance of the image of God in man, which implies that even the terrestrial life of each individual person is sacred and inviolabl
to perceive the true significance of the image of God in man, which implies that even the terrestrial
life of each individual person is sacred and inviolable.
In the 1950s, Richard Hofstadter, Daniel Bell, and
others employed this theory
to explain the emergence of a political right wing in American public
life.
And
explained to him how he took God's word and made them his own, then taught
others to do harm
to people that don't believe in his words and ruin their
lives!
Therefore, it is not beyond reality that there are
other forces at work that impact our
lives that have yet
to be fully observed or
explained.
In archaic religion each man finds meaning by repeating the creation, or
to put it the
other way about, he finds meaning by projecting the pattern of his own little story into the great story which
explains not only his own little
life but how things are.
Here's the quote re Einstein's belief: In 2007, in an interview with Benjamin Wiker, Flew said again that his deism was the result of his «growing empathy with the insight of Einstein and
other noted scientists that there had
to be an Intelligence behind the integrated complexity of the physical Universe» and «my own insight that the integrated complexity of
life itself — which is far more complex than the physical Universe — can only be
explained in terms of an Intelligent Source.»
Furthermore, today children are more likely than people of any
other age group
to live in poverty, and, as Mintz
explains in such excellent detail, it has always been true that when children
live in poverty both their physical and social needs are apt
to go unmet.
Millions upon millions of years old makes since when you have
to explain how a fish, bird, dog, monkey, all
other living species and humans are all so different now.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them
to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared
to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of
life's questions are all within this book, not
other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it
to be discerned, which the verse itself
explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.
Others which could be
explained in detail are the testimony of the early church, the witness of history and archaeology, and the evidence of changed
lives throughout the centuries,
to name but a few.
Indeed, the truth of the matter can never be fully
explained, for like all personal relationships in their depth and in their strange yet wonderful capacity
to enrich our
living — of human
life with God's
life, of men and women with each
other — there is a mystery here which we must accept with «natural piety» but which we can never hope
to explicate with utter clarity.
This discomfort you seem
to be paroling, has it overtaken your
Life conjuring will
to explain to others your religious misfortunes and discomforting issues that you find an ensuing and unquenched need
to tell
others what your found upon the net; information
others may find enlightening as you have found it
to be?
Most theological authors are specialists: one interprets the scriptural foundations for preaching and teaching, another
explains how
to «manage» ministry, and
others confine themselves
to some particular subsection of parish
life — liturgy, youth work, pastoral...
«Holding a
live treasure
others don't recognize can be a burden,» he goes on, «having
to protect it and nurture it and
explain it, teach it
to others.»
Genesis, along with every
other creation story from every culture on the planet, tells a story in terms that that culture's people could understand
to explain how
life began.
Happiness and unhappiness in this
life, and death and the everlasting
life, have been
explained in such a way that there is no
other explanation that is equal
to it.
Its intention is
to affirm and
explain the faith,
life, and worship of the Catholic Church, and the fact is that - historically and theologically - the disputes with Lutherans, Calvinists, Zwinglians, and
others in the sixteenth century is far from being the most formative experience in the Church's understanding of her faith,
life, and worship.
Without it, we need some smart folks
to explain it
to us because it get's real complicated trying
to hold faith, the gospel, eternal
life, salvation, repentance, and all the
other teachings together with any kind of congruity.
When someone thinks their beliefs give them the right
to control how
others live their
lives, they should not be offended when I demand that they be able
to rationally and logically
explain their beliefs.
On the one hand, the word «evolution» describes
life's advance; on the
other, it claims
to explain that advance.
The letter, written for his boss,
explained his decision
to transition
to living as a woman and his new expectations of
others.
In a letter
to her friend Julia Scott, Elizabeth
explained her vision of
life, which proved so productive: «Faith lifts the staggering soul on one side, hope supports it on the
other, experience says it must be and love says let it be.»
Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt
explain to Job either why he had
to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal
life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats
to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens
to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we
to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us
to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need
to be saved from ourselves so what are we
to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many
other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven
to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come
to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if
other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have
to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
Rahn... Do i really need
to back up what i think online... and you being the expert... why do nt you fully
explain to me the state that the country is in... enlighten me... but you already know how far that will go... just as my attempt
to change
others mind's fell short... so will any
others opinion... i have my mind made up for my own well founded reasons... all im saying is that spending all day protesting and postulating is of no benefit
to anyone... going about your
life and making things best for yourself is in the best interest of this country as a whole... I believe Adam Smith said it best... the best results come from one person doing whats best for himself and the team... not throwing a hissy fit
•
Other commentators
explained that the «day» mentioned in Genesis 2:17 referred
to a day of God, which is equal
to a thousand years and that had Adam not sinned, he would in fact have
lived forever.
It would
explain why Jesus knew the Greek language and therefore may have had knowledge of Greek philosophy, such as cynicism and
other factions (not
to mention that he was supposed
to have
lived in Egypt for some time in his youth).
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius
to realize from my statements that i have read things
other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening
to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened
to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and
others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully
explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying
to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid
to liquid,
to gas...
to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their
lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT
to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
But you and I
live (are part of / operate in) in two different worlds, andf I'm saying this in thsoe words, becaue of the lack of finding
others to explain myself....
Most theological authors are specialists: one interprets the scriptural foundations for preaching and teaching, another
explains how
to «manage» ministry, and
others confine themselves
to some particular subsection of parish
life — liturgy, youth work, pastoral care.