All is not well in mormon land, their faithful are questioning
the living Apostles of Jesus, like Elder Holland.
The church is organized on the same principles as the original and ancient church of Jesus Christ on the foundation of
living apostles and prophets and with priesthood authority from God.
That is why a man must be chosen of God through revelation to represent him and to preach his holy word — a thing that protestant churches totally lack because they apostatized from the Catholic church and which the catholic church can not claim either because the first pope was a bishop, not an apostle, and to this day can claim no authority from
living apostles.
Today, members preach that the Lord has indeed restored His Church with
living apostles and prophets, starting with the founding prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints, Joseph Smith.
Not exact matches
Or if Jesus» sacrifice now allows all to
live in sin, why did Jesus, John the Baptist, and the early
apostles all preach repentance?
Jesus wants you to have the same kind of carefree, trouble free, guiltless, fearless, kind of
life that He and the
Apostles had.
the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the
apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and
living as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...
It only clarifies that what the
apostles had written and testified about Jesus as Son of God, as God, and as one who had died for the sins of mankind, who was raised to
life and will return literally in this world in their writings ARE ALL FALSE TESTIMONIES about Jesus, which means the
apostles had presented to us a false «Jesus», for Jesus still says in Rev. 22:16 that he will send an «angel» or messenger to testify about him (Jesus).
This continuing work of the Spirit is evident in, for instance, the formulation of the
Apostles», Nicene, and Athanasian creeds, and in the conciliar resolution of disputes regarding the two natures of Christ and the triune
life of God.
His
apostles were real people who gave their
lives for him.
There's no extra-Biblical evidence any of the
apostles even
lived, let alone how they died.
Only
living persons are to be baptized, for just before Jesus ascension to heaven, he gave the command to his eleven faithful
apostles: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them... teaching then to observe all the things I have commanded you.»
The
apostle Paul often lists things that are contrary to the Holy Spirit and the new
life of the Christian.
Your statement that «all the comments on this subject (concerning atheists) do not come from happy people... who despise, are upset, have nothing, are not thankful and... have nothing to
live for» goes against the very way that both Jesus and the
apostles taught when speaking with individuals who do not share their view.
Jesus eschewed worldly wealth Jesus made it quite clear that rich people must give away all their worldly possessions to enter his kingdom (Mark 10:21, Luke 14:26 - 33, Luke 18:18 - 22), he stood for the poor and underprivileged (Luke 12:33), and Jesus and the early
apostles practiced communal
life sharing all possessions (Luke 3:11, Acts 4:32, 2 Cor 8:13).
For almost 400 years after Jesus Christ's resurrection the people did not have the Bible... they were not lost but
lived by conscience and Tradition of the
Apostles.
We try to contribute to the renewal of these treasures of salvation in the
lives of Gods people through a renewed clarity of understanding of Gods plan of Wisdom and redeeming Love for his creatures, a renewed enthusiasm for handing on his Word, a deepened personal love for our Lord Jesus Christ and a fresh dedication to
living the high standards of integrity in both charity and chastity which should mark his true disciples and
apostles in the modern world.
The
apostle Paul told the believers in Rome that the one «who raised Christ from the dead will give
life to your mortal bodies also through his Spirit that dwells in you» (Rom.
There are patent differences here in points of reference: the prophet's purview is the people, the evangelist addresses the church and the
apostle speaks of
life within the imperial state.
The answer to that question is the answer to this question: «Did Peter and the other
apostles believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus when they beleived in Him for eternal
life?»
The
apostle Paul writing to the church in Ephesus encouraged them «with regard to your former way of
life, to put off your old self... and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.»
Wonderful teacher... get out your Bible and start reading... this guy is a wolf in sheep's clothing leading millions to an eternity in hell... the prosperity gospel he teaches is contrary to the teachings of Christ... Christ talked about abundance in
life but he was speaking of spiritual abundance not material things... Scripture and Christ said in this
life you will have trouble... Christ suffered in this
life as did each of his
Apostles... open your eyes before it is too late for you.
As I looked out over the 180 people taking New Testament interpretation, I saw folk who had never been to church in their
lives, and for whom the YDS chapel was their first parish; who certainly did not know the Nicene Creed and probably not the
Apostles» Creed.
I have not yet seen an explanation on how Peter and the
apostles could have eternal
life without believing in the death and resurrection of Jesus, but how today we must believe it.
While none of Jesus» twelve
apostles were women, Mary Magdalene was considered an important figure in his
life, and it was the ladies who first found out about Jesus» victory over death.
For some the
apostle is «a savior from death unto death» and for others a «savior from
life unto
life» (2 Cor.
while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should know to write such a article, the laws give to people of all walks of
life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves to make the decision whether to go to war, or if a person should be put to death, as far as jesus and the
apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one to give to another.
We learn that the word «martyr» means «witness» and that «
apostle» means «one who is sent» and then grasp what this really meant in the
lives of the
Apostles, and indeed what it means today: «Faith and love in Jesus will issue forth in ministry.
McKnight does a masterful job defining and defending this understanding of «Gospel» and includes chapters about the Gospel that Jesus preached, the Gospel that Paul preached, and the Gospel that Peter and the other
apostles preach, and how this understanding of «Gospel» shows that they all preached, proclaimed, and
lived the same gospel.
Though this is not meant to imply that an educated layman ought not also sometimes have the courage, in the right place and in the right manner, to give an account of the hope that is in him and, as the
apostle says, is active in his
life.
No one was getting paid because no one was in charge, and remember the twelve Jewish
Apostles took no money either and they
lived locally and had the same day jobs they had When Jesus met them.
The
apostles were «immersed» in sufferings and persecution all for the purpose of bringing
life to the dead.
The sovereigns were deemed junior
apostles, entitled to rule «in trust» the everyday
life of the Church in Europe and her colonies.
Whereas Paul described his former
life in Judaism as focused on human relationships with his contemporaries and predecessors, his depiction of his new
life is so centered on his relation to God that he as yet has no relationship to the other
apostles.
«He came back to
life (ALIVE) however he still had his wounds one of the
apostles stuck his hand near the rib cage.
First, with the passage of time the apostolic tradition, which had been the sum and substance of (the
Apostles») teaching on the
life, death, and resurrection of Christ, became broadened to include extra-biblical, oral teaching which was supposed to have come from the
Apostles.
What is happening here, for the first time in two thousand years, for the first time since the
apostle Paul pondered the continuing «mystery» of
Living Judaism, for the first time since the Church condemned Marcion as a heretic in the second century, for the first time since so many things in our tortuously entangled relationship, is that believing Jews and Christians are encountering one another on a footing of civil equality in a shared exploration of the way through history of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus.
To be an
apostle is to become expendable, low status, and exposed to ridicule and insecurity in this
life: â $ œFor it seems to me that God has put us
apostles on display at the end of the procession, like men condemned to die in the arena.
The majority of the communions represented hold to the Nicene and
Apostles» creeds; others, such as Baptists, Congregationalists and Disciples, recognize these as witnesses in past generations, but do not hold them in the same reverence, emphasizing instead a personal faith in the
living God through the
living Christ.
But the vast majority of these traditions do not accurately reflect how Jesus
lived and ministered, nor the
apostles in the book of Acts.
hm, a hypocrite is someone who says they've done nothing wrong [and judged others]... not someone who is striving to
live a right
life, realizing they need Christ... like the
apostle Paul, I understand my sin and struggles — make no excuse for them, accept God's grace and try to move forward
Which
apostle (s) are verified to have given their
lives for it?
Were there sins in the
lives of the
apostles that were persistent and that they continued to choose to do?
I feel that one can not understand the NT very well unless one knows the culture and times that Jesus and the
apostles were
living in.
The
apostles were in a position to KNOW if Jesus truly had risen from the dead and they were willing to give their
lives for the spread of the gospel, regardless of the persecution they faced.
So how does the work of
living out the gospel fit with the foundation that has been laid by the
apostles and prophets?
For example, the 12
apostles,
lived with jesus for 3 years.
James, too, had suffered martyrdom in A.D. 62, and death must have begun to take its toll among the rest of the
apostles by the time that the Jewish revolt and the final capture of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 by the Romans had disorganised the
life of Palestine for a generation.
These writings have their being, as they had their origin, within the
life of a community which traces its descent from Abraham and Moses, from prophets and
apostles, and plays its part in the history of our own time; and the Scriptures not only recall its past, but serve the needs of its day - to - day existence in the present.
It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony as to what the
apostles taught about the Christian
life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own
life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by
apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the
apostles themselves.