This was based on research by Baillie and McAneney (2015) which compared the spacing between frost ring events (physical scarring of
living growth rings by prolonged sub-zero temperatures) in the bristlecone pine tree ring chronology, and spacing between prominent acids in a suite of ice cores from both Greenland and Antarctica.
Not exact matches
Life does not merely «snowball»; it behaves more like a tree, which acquires successive
rings according to the particular fashion of its
growth, in a predetermined or directed manner.
A team of scientists in Hawaii has developed a way to chart the chronology of a turtle's
life using the
growth lines in its shell, much like the
life span of a giant sequoia might be measured in tree
rings.
Despite this trauma, analysis of the annual
growth rings inside the dinosaur's bones by the Royal Ontario Museum's Dr. David Evans suggest it
lived to maturity.
Researchers are using her tough, hairlike baleen to develop a new method of reconstructing a whale's
life story — much as scientists use
growth rings to reveal a tree's past.
This quahog can
live for more than 500 years — and, as it does, it lays down
growth rings in its shell.
Others worried that it relied too heavily on
growth rings from a small number of ancient trees, such as California bristlecone pines that can
live thousands of years clinging to mountainsides.
What was not seen quite so strongly is the way that the negative exponential
growth curve severely underestimates the
ring widths of the long
lived group.
Doesn't that mean that these measurements of tree -
ring growth versus age don't all start from year zero in the
life of each tree?
Of course this is all moot if the relativel short -
lived trees don't actually begin
life with a (statistically) significantly higher
growth rate, or if (say)
ring growth and root
growth don't go together... which I don't know about.
I can't find the reference, but Steve recently quoted someone who writes forest management software for a
living, who said that it's very difficult to predict tree
ring growth even when the precise siting weather and soil nutrient details for the
growth year are known.
Doesn't that mean that the outer
rings of
living trees would be expected to be thicker than those of even directly corresponding (in age and
growth factors) dead trees?
It is common for time series of
ring widths to contain a low frequency component resulting entirely from the tree
growth itself, with wider
rings generally produced during the early
life of the tree.