Sentences with phrase «living in a free society»

Part of living in a free society means being bombarded by messages we don't like.

You don't deserve to live in a free society.

We live in a free society.

He made their economic dream of getting rich come true while sacrificing the political dream of many to live in a free society.

Facing weak and scattered criticism for expressing your beliefs is not persecution, it's part of living in a free society.

It's astounding here we live in a free society where faeries can be faeries but a normal person can't be normal or even voice an opinion without being castrated.

The moment you do that, you no longer are living in a free society.

We live in a free society; and if artists are free, they can be prophets in that society.

There are important values on each side of the generation gap — values which need to be brought together to help persons achieve a full life in a free society.

And it is your damn right to have them, after all we live in a free society.

The power of imagination and creativity and innovation that comes with living in a free society.»

If they fail, due to lack of education and life chances, they're told they are living in free societies, where everybody has the potential to succeed.

But it also warned that images of the prophet were a valid part of satire and that suffering offence was an important part of living in a free society.

It also prepares a child to be responsible for his or her life in a free society, in the spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance, equality of sexes, and friendship among all people, ethnic, national and religious groups and persons of indigenous origin (25).

The problem arises where it is utilized to undermine our well - being as autonomous beings living in free societies.

That is the price we pay to live in a free society.

While the general public may have a negative impression of this kind of defence, it is part and parcel of living in a free society.

Not exact matches

«It's quite normal for Americans and Western people to behave like this — they live in free sex societies where nobody cares about this sort of thing, so what do you expect?»

How are people seeking to dismantle the divides between Jew and Gentile, slave and free, male and female supposed to live in a society where these divisions were so central to the culture and where doing so my arouse even more suspicion and persecution?

It must further be asked how such a society can have a truth that makes free without leaving man in a void in which neither he nor society can live.

And second is that we live in a society just like our faith teaches us of free will where people can choose to worship or not at all.

It is love to obey God, and by having a swift death penalty we love the people in our society [many of whom are our enemies also] and offer them the best chance for a life free from fear and crime.

If you can't stand watching your religion being criticized in a free society by free thinking adults, go live in a church without any access to the public or something.

For Solidarnosc showed in the most unlikely circumstances the power of freedom in the lives of men driven by their faith and its vision (per John Paul II) of a free and open society.

Couples in Western societies who are free to select each other without being limited by the dictates of parents and society and who are free to work out their life trajectories together must be able to communicate with respect and justice.

The crucial thing here was not that the State, particularly in its more or less totalitarian forms, weakened and gradually displaced the free associations, but that the political principle with all its centralistic features percolated into the associations themselves modifying their structure and their whole inner life, and thus politicized society to an ever - increasing extent.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words — father, mother, spouse, parents — retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

The question is being asked whether the price for the present pattern is not too high, whether we could not, without losing me many good things in our society, have a freer impulse life, a richer imaginative consciousness, be less alienated from our bodies, be capable of more profound intimacy with a few and more community with many others.

Those who believe in justice as competition typically also adhere to a larger conviction: The good society maximizes the place of the free market because the overriding purpose of our life together is to make possible the satisfaction of people's wants.

David can produce his cartoons because he lives in a free, western (Christian - ish) society and because he does not aim them at Islam or despots.

Its aim is a society of free and responsible individuals, with the life of each made more full and more free through sharing in the life of all.

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 104) The originality prevents us then from holding that in abstraction from its animal body an «entirely living» nexus is a society.

The resulting confusion is similar to the one that appears in political life when a particular democratic society is made the object of a devotion that genuine democracy extends only to humanity, created free and endowed with natural rights prior to any recognition of these facts.

In other ways also the churches in the New World seem to be «American» or «democratic» and to participate primarily in the common life of the «free society.&raquIn other ways also the churches in the New World seem to be «American» or «democratic» and to participate primarily in the common life of the «free society.&raquin the New World seem to be «American» or «democratic» and to participate primarily in the common life of the «free society.&raquin the common life of the «free society.»

The consensus that will emerge embraces both practical education and general education, with the goals of the latter characterized as giving the student «the values, attitudes, and skills that will equip him to live rightly and well in a free society.»

Gary Bauer, a conservative Christian leader who opposes the Park51 project, responded that «Anybody in public life, in a free society, has nuts that threaten their lives.»

There's still plenty of opportunity to live virtuous — even heroically virtuous — lives as free and prosperous men and women in a society such as ours.

Quite a few of us have stable relationships, raise healthy well - educated children, are free from addiction, vote, volunteer and donate to support causes that help make this society work, live in harmony with people who are different from us — I could go on, but you may get the idea that most of us do things most people would call good and have neither the inclination nor the time to do abominable things.

In a general sense, one can speak of four areas of struggle: (i) the system of economic exploitation and social stratification (racial segregation, women's working conditions, unemployment and the new legislation of «flexibility and «deregulation); (ii) the ideology (the way of representing the world, social relations, etc.) that justifies the system — the new ideologies of race superiority, the religious legitimation of competition and the so - called free market as the only and sufficient way of organizing human life (iii) the ways in which the consciousness of the oppressed, is led to interject this ideology of domination and to develop a feeling of self - denial and self - devaluation; (iv) the atomization of the society through the weakening and destruction of neighborhood, workers and local cultural manifestationIn a general sense, one can speak of four areas of struggle: (i) the system of economic exploitation and social stratification (racial segregation, women's working conditions, unemployment and the new legislation of «flexibility and «deregulation); (ii) the ideology (the way of representing the world, social relations, etc.) that justifies the system — the new ideologies of race superiority, the religious legitimation of competition and the so - called free market as the only and sufficient way of organizing human life (iii) the ways in which the consciousness of the oppressed, is led to interject this ideology of domination and to develop a feeling of self - denial and self - devaluation; (iv) the atomization of the society through the weakening and destruction of neighborhood, workers and local cultural manifestationin which the consciousness of the oppressed, is led to interject this ideology of domination and to develop a feeling of self - denial and self - devaluation; (iv) the atomization of the society through the weakening and destruction of neighborhood, workers and local cultural manifestations.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place, without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words» father, mother, spouse, parents» retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs or a pawns in a power struggle.

Why are you questioning Americans having American ideals, it is the Muslim Immigrants who refuse to assimilate prefering instead to keep there Muslim ways even while living here in an open free society.

But finally the ministers who, as Lyman Beecher said, were «chosen by the people who have been educated as free men,» and were «dependent on them for patronage and support, «88 achieved such status as their reputation for personal piety, character, and ability made possible in the society in which they lived.

A 2016 report by the Vegan Society claimed that the number of vegans in Britain has risen by 360 % over the past decade, with more than half a million people between the ages of 15 - 34 living a meat and dairy - free existence.

It has always been my understanding that the brave men and women who fought and died for our country did so to ensure that we could live in a fair and free society, which includes the right to speak out in protest.

It is about building a global society in which people live free from poverty and share the benefits of prosperity.

But since we are currently living in a society in which childbirth has been co-opted by the patriarchy and birth has become monopolized by the medical model, we have to call natural birth «Free Birth.»

We want to see a society in which everybody aspires to live a healthy, smoke - free life and has access to the support that can help them realise this ambition.»

«Universal free school meals will help give every child the chance in life that they deserve, building a stronger economy and fairer society.»

That is why social security has got to change so that we make the right to live as full citizens in a free society a reality for disabled people.

Unencumbered by human frailties, Curiosity — like the rovers Spirit and Opportunity, which survived on the Red Planet years longer than expected — will be free to hunt for E.T. «If we find evidence for life on Mars, boy, are we just gonna go wild with speculation about how common it is in the universe,» says Lou Friedman, a former scientist with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena and cofounder, with Carl Sagan, of the Planetary Society.