Although no -
load mutual funds do not charge sales loads, you still have to watch the management expenses, which can be quite high.
A no -
load mutual fund does not come with a sales charge, the financial term for commission, and an indexed mutual fund does not require active portfolio management.
Not exact matches
Furthermore, the 1 percent you pay to your money manager doesn't always cover the costs of buying and selling the stocks and bonds in your portfolio or the sales charges (also known as
loads) and administrative fees charged by the
mutual funds your manager puts you into.
Add to the top of that the fees you pay on your
mutual funds and don't know it, or sales charges on
funds that have
loads and you have succeeded in actually costing yourself money each year.
In
doing so, the complaint continues, DOL «bans common and long - accepted forms of compensation for financial services and insurance professionals, such as commissions and sales
loads (a
mutual fund sales charge).
They typically perform worse than similar
mutual funds that don't have a
load, even BEFORE you factor in the extra cost.
And for the love of God, people,
do not invest in ANY
mutual fund that has a sales charge /
load (Class A, Class B, Class C shares) or charges a 12 - b1 fee.
Trading
Mutual funds of No
Load type will give you a direct profit share and you
do not have to worry about fee involved etc..
The cost difference is more evident when compared with
mutual funds that charge a front - end or back - end
load as ETFs
do not have
loads at all.
Recently, we received an e-mail from a young investor who wanted to invest in a
mutual fund but didn't know what the terms «
Load» and «No -
Load» meant.
Schwab also offers some of the lowest expense ratios for index
funds and ETFs, and it
did away with
mutual funds that carry
loads, or initial sales charges.
The first thing to
do is make sure you're not overinvested in the Canadian market, says Tom Bradley, president of Steadyhand, a no -
load mutual fund company.
His books won't have
loads of detailed investing advice, but are a great primer for people that don't know very much about investing beyond «
fund my 401 (k) & buy
mutual funds.»
The survey also suggested that many investors
do not know the difference between
loads (sales charges) and normal operating expenses of
mutual funds.
80 %
did not know the definition of a «no
load»
mutual fund.
Q: I happened upon your 1985 book «Market Timing with No -
Load Mutual Funds» and wonder, how
do you feel about market timing since you occasionally mentioned that you have a portion of your investments in market timing?
From my understanding, it is conventional wisdom that if a person wishes to invest in the stock market but
does not have the time or aptitude to evaluate individual stocks and time the market, he should invest only in no -
load, low - fee
mutual index
funds, using a dollar - cost averaging strategy in a buy - and - hold fashion.
ETS may also receive direct compensation through imposition of a transaction fee for the purchase or redemption of shares of
mutual funds that
do not impose a sales
load.
Mutual funds which
do not charge sales
loads are referred to as «no -
load»
funds.
Similarly, Alpholio ™
does not take into account the front or rear
loads of
mutual funds, to which such charges apply.
Funds that do not charge a load are called no - load funds, which are typically sold directly by the mutual fund com
Funds that
do not charge a
load are called no -
load funds, which are typically sold directly by the mutual fund com
funds, which are typically sold directly by the
mutual fund company.
Don't forget that
mutual funds also charge either front end or back end
loads which also reduce the annual returns and can play havoc with annual rebalancing at least in the short term (5 to 10 years after purchase).
My view is that no
load mutual funds are the logical choice for investors who have some investment experience and the time to
do the
mutual fund research necessary to make a thoughtful investment decision.
Unlike many other innovations, including many
mutual funds, ETFs don't
load you up with high management fees, or tie you down with heavy redemption charges if you... Read More
Keep in mind that some research has shown that
mutual fund investors
do better with an advisor (even after the
loads) than they
do on their own.
• These model allocations work for all methods of
doing business: We have Fee - Based (where
mutual fund front - end
loads are waived), no -
load mutual funds / Index
funds / ETFs / and all front - end
loaded mutual fund models.
No
load bond
funds also can also provide a very high degree of fixed income securities investment diversification, and no
load mutual funds can
do this very economically.
I started out with $ 500, and they have a huge selection of no -
load, no - transaction fee
mutual funds, so I've never paid a dime that didn't increase the value of my retirement account.
As for people in the comments that point out you don't like
mutual funds (I assume especially
mutual funds with
loads and / or high expense ratios)-- to that I say, as long as your employer is matching contributions (let's say 1:1) you start out with a 100 % gain on your money so even a miserable
fund that only returns enough to cover fees — you still DOUBLE YOUR MONEY.
If you don't sell the
mutual fund until the seventh year, you don't have to pay the back - end
load at all.
Index
funds don't have the sales charges known as
loads, which many
mutual funds have.
You don't have to pay a front - end or back - end
load when purchasing or redeeming the
mutual funds issued under the SEC rule 12b - 1.
They
do, however, offer over 1,000 no transaction fee and no
load mutual funds (but
mutual funds are on the way out versus ETFs).
There is no need for
mutual fund investors to ever have to pay these additional fees, since there are plenty of perfectly good
funds to choose from that are «no -
load»
funds and
do not charge any 12b - 1 fees.
Because there are many no -
load mutual funds with low expense fees and no 12b - 1 fees, there's almost no reason for an investor to pick a
mutual fund that has higher fees over one that doesn't.
ETFs
do not charge
loads or 12b - 1 fees and most have lower expense fees than comparable
mutual funds.
Unlike other
mutual funds, money market
funds generally
do not have
load (commission) fees.
The numbers above
do not factor in the additional «
load» fees that
mutual funds can charge.
Do they perform better than the S&P 500 index no
load mutual funds?
Doing this is likely to be a foolish strategy, since historical
mutual fund return data tends to be much less reliable than picking much lower cost no
load index investing
funds with passive management, low turnover, and low fees.
Fidelity
does not review the Morningstar data and, for
mutual fund performance, you should check the
fund's current prospectus for the most up - to - date information concerning applicable
loads, fees and expenses.
Please note that all of this is NOT saying you shouldn't invest - it's saying that you'll most always
do better by
doing - it - yourself (AKA DIY) using no -
load mutual funds, or by hiring a fee - only financial advisor (instead of a commission - based life insurance agent).
Step 9) One of the first things to
do is determine which mode of investing account the client will have - Fee - Based, all no -
load mutual funds, all
load mutual funds, all Index / ETF, CHIM, stocks / bonds / individual securities, whatever.
As you can see on this demo download, our $ 20k minimum no -
load mutual fund models consistently
do better than this 1 % to 2 % delta over what the average 529 plan returns.
This is where the
mutual fund does not charge a front - nor back - end
load, but charges up to several times more in annual 12b - 1 fees than on A-shares (and sometimes even more than B - shares).
Here
mutual funds with front - end
loads are bought at NAV (Net Asset Value, or in English, the initial sales charges on A-shares are waived so the investor doesn't pay them).
If other screening criteria indicate that a
fund could be attractive, the fact that it is an unfamiliar
fund should have absolutely no bearing on whether you decide to
do more investigation of an unfamiliar
mutual fund — preferably a no
load index
fund.
After
doing all of this, you'll see that you'll most likely have much more money in a well - allocated DIY portfolio of no -
load mutual funds, than in most all variable annuities, even after the wonderful tax benefits of the VA..
As a financial advisor I
do advise my client to invest in
mutual funds along with other options, but I also disclose up front before they invest a dime about the MER's and how they work; I also disclose the options of DSC and No -
Load funds.
The only way to not pay anyone anything, other than the
mutual fund management fee (which can't be avoided and goes to pay the
mutual fund and its investment managers), is to learn how to manage your own money and / or
do your own
mutual fund analysis (then only buy true no -
load mutual funds).