Sentences with phrase «loan contract if»

As a last word, make sure to pay attention to the loan contract if you are approved for a loan.

As a last word, make sure to pay attention to the loan contract if you are approved for a loan.

Not exact matches

If you have any valuable assets (i.e. inventory, equipment, vehicles, electronics, property, contracts, pending invoice payments, etc.) you may be able to sell some of these at market value to generate quick cash, or use them as collateral in obtaining a secured loan.

Plus, if you have a signed loan contract and the loan isn't repaid, you can claim a tax deduction for a non-business bad debt, Jucoski said.

The promissory note is a «promise to pay» contract between you and the lender that is providing your loan money (if you have a Direct Loan, the lender is the federal governmeloan money (if you have a Direct Loan, the lender is the federal governmeLoan, the lender is the federal government).

For example, if you're planning to use the loan proceeds to buy another business you will need to provide a copy of the purchase contract, the target company's financial statements, tax returns, and other details about them.

If you can prove there was a breach of contract or deceptive practices, you could have a chance of convincing a judge to discharge your student loans.

Review your private loan contracts carefully to better understand what rights you have if you are worried about going into default.

If LendingCrowd were to go out of business, investors would still continue to receive repayments on loans originated with us, because all loan contracts are between borrowers and investors and would remain valid.

In fact, funding contracts explicitly state that if you stop having receivables and you go out of business, you're not entitled to pay back the business loan.

A loan is considered defaulted if the borrower fails to repay it on the terms that were agreed to in the loan contract.

If you plan to do this, you must make sure your loan contract specifies that there are not prepayment penalties.

This loan agreement is a business contract, so it has all the parts necessary for the contract to be valid, that is, for it to be enforceable in court, if necessary.

Prepayment penalties or exit fees are usually included in the loan contract before you sign, so if you know you're going to be paying early, avoid lenders that charge one.

There are questions to be asked Why was jenkinson loaned out if Bellerin is not ready Why was Coquen (sorry can't spell) sent out if he was good enough 12 games ago tom e named Why keep Campbell if he's not good enough wouldn't money from his sale be better spent on a CB Why when SAGNA / Viera / and other 30 plus players were only offered 1 year contracts yet we are now scratching a midfield together with flamini / Arteta Why when things are not working e.g Moreal at CB do we persist with it I can put all these decisions down to wenger, and that's not bringing up the lack of signings

methinks its about time dude's contract is torn up and he is moved on... and if that is not an option then his salary should be slashed by half and sent out on loan.....

@BfB If we had bought Cabaye last summer as you opined, Coquelin would have ended his contract (with us) on loan.

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

I hope he gets a new contract and loaned to a EPL team to gain more experience, he may not make it at Arsenal but we could sell him for more money if he was on a longer contract and has EPL experience behind him.

Oxlade has the most potential out of the lot if he decides he needs regular game time we can sign him a new contract, recall Joel Campbell and send him on loan.

The 22 year - old is under contract in North - London until 2020, so another loan deal could be a possibility if Wenger believes he still has the potential, albeit without being ready yet, but he is already falling way behind Holding, and his sale would bolster our finances as we look at a busy transfer window.

Release: Flamini, Diaby (if injured again) Extend contract: Arteta and Walcott Sell: Podolski, Campbell and Sanogo Loan: Akpom, Hayden, Miyachi, Zelalem Bring back: Wellington Silva, Jenkison Sign: Schneiderlin or Kondogbia and Lacazette or Dybala and young LB.

Liverpool «s on - loan striker Mario Balotelli has been urged to prove his worth at AC Milan if wants to receive a new contract at the club.

It's reported that if Zelalem does agree terms with VVV Venlo, then Arsene Wenger will look to secure a new contract with the player before he leaves on loan.

If he's going to be let go, it has to be a sale and not a loan, we can't have another player entering the last year of his contract and I don't think he's done enough to warrant a new contract.

Personally if he is to move away on loan, I think it should be a six month deal, with the option of a January extension, or at least Arsenal can put a return clause in the loan contract, should the Gunners be short of options in midfield.

I can not imagine Wenger would bring him back except perhaps on a low - salary, 6 month contract / loan for backup insurance if Debuchy departs.

The ones that definitely will be leaving include: Jenkinson, Debuchy, Chambers, Gibbs and Lucas Pérez, while Jack Wilshere is also likely to be snapped up after playing very well last night, although that may be a loan if Wenger asks him to sign a contract extension before deadline day.

If Alexis contract wasn't so low then I would be surprised if AFC would listen to offers less near double the offers we read about now... Silent Stan doesn't have to sell the player to get a loan from a bank... He only needs the share prices to back him in his business dealIf Alexis contract wasn't so low then I would be surprised if AFC would listen to offers less near double the offers we read about now... Silent Stan doesn't have to sell the player to get a loan from a bank... He only needs the share prices to back him in his business dealif AFC would listen to offers less near double the offers we read about now... Silent Stan doesn't have to sell the player to get a loan from a bank... He only needs the share prices to back him in his business deals.

One thing that may be holding the deal up, however, is the fact that a clause in the loan deal means that Everton will be forced to pay City a fee if they signed the former Aston Villa man on a permanent contract this summer.

If he is going to sign a new contract then possibly try a bringing him in to the first team, or probably loan him out but make sure he actually gets game time.

I like Wilshire, he is as Arsenal as you can get, he is also in the last year of his contract and has to impress Wenger to earn a new contract, other wise its another player we lose on a free, i believe Wenger would of sold him if he could of so loaning a guy out with a year left on his contract would of been stupid, I hope he does get a chance to impress and can recapture his form when he first broke into the team and stay injury free, the season is long and there's plenty of games to give him

Now this isn't the most convincing argument to try and convince a player that he should stay with the squad, with the word «think» involved, but it seems as if letting him go out on loan would be silly given his contract is into it's final 12 months.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

A loan is only worthwhile if a new contract is signed... None of these have anything to do with a new signing.

Extend his contract and loan if we need to save on his salary, but do not sell.

You want Mr Wenger to send Joel Campbell on loan, let look at the facts Campbell has been on three consecutive loan spells at Lorient, Real Betis and Olympiacos in his five year contract, if Campbell went on loan at crystal palace and played well, at the end of the season he may decide to listen to offers and not extent his contract we us.

... what happened to Ivan and Wenger putting a buy - back clause in his contract when they sold him to Bremen (Madrid, Barcelona and Juve do this)... mate i think you should also add the likes of Debuchy, Gibbs, Jenkinson, Walcott cos if you can keep this dudes and not send them on loan, rather give them new contracts then this guy should have been given ample opportunity in the first team... Bayern only acted wisely cos they know the young lad who scored 11 gaols in 27 bundesliga appearances is more like the future of the German squad and since Sanchez» weekly pay is just too much for a German club to pay Gnabry can offer them something close to it (Sanchez any day though)

It could have gone either ways for Coquelin but fortunately for him, it looks like it's going well, if he comes back from loan and still is not adding any visible value to the team as is the case with Coquelin recently, he will leave, if he does well, we'll be talking a new contract.

If he doesn't get gametime, then why would he sign a contract to rot on the bench / get loaned out again?

If we do loan Szcz out then we will only have 1 GK which will not be enough, we will need to sign a keeper on a short term and being over 30 Cech will not get the longest contract... say a couple years?

The 27 year - old left - back actually first arrived at Malaga on loan to replace Nacho Monreal after he left for the Gunners, and was impressive enough to earn a four - year contract with the Spaniards, so he could be a useful stop - gap if we make a bid for him in January.

Didn't mention Campbell but he's a wildcard cause at this point I really don't know what Le Prof wants to do with him has a lot of qualities and could replace Poldi and Sanogo if sold / loaned out... At the end all will depend on the Walcott contract extension saga and what he brings from now until season's end!!

The Union currently have three first team roster spots available and can sign a fourth player to a first team contract if they are sent on a season - long loan to Steel.

Having said that, often in countries like Spain, they write their clauses into a player's loan contract, so if both clubs agree on this, then it is something beyond Wenger's control.

I needed some reassurances that we wouldn't be selling all of our players and that we had some budget to try to strengthen the team if we could, having lost 12 players through either loans going back or people out of contract.»

I am happy with him as Sagna's understudy but perhaps a Premiership loan would aid his development, especially if Sagna does not renew his contract with us.

Even if Johnstone heads back to the Championship on loan, it is likely that his contract will be extended.

If a transfer for the player fails, another loan spell could well happen with the Uruguayan out of contract next summer, which could see the player leave United as a free agent.

«If our legal persons did not look at the agreement and they signed the contract before we even got the loan then I think it is prudent that they have reduced it from 3 billion to 1.