Sentences with phrase «loan sizes because»

You'll also get access to larger loan sizes because loan limits for multi-unit homes are higher than for 1 - unit properties.

Not exact matches

IDR is a great option because it takes your income, loan debt and family size into consideration.

And because small and medium sized businesses still need capital, that generates a genuine opportunity for independent commercial loan brokers.

Businesses and investors look to finance loan brokers because they have the depth of knowledge to find the right type of financing to fit the situation at hand, and can present alternatives to conventional loans because there is no «one size fits all» solution when it comes to businesses.

The risks associated with purchasing the mid-size leveraged loan business are not as pronounced as some would suggest, in part because the size of the loans are relatively small and not concentrated with any one company, he said.

That's because there are finite costs associated with every loan, regardless of its size.

Additionally, borrowers that could qualify as an AA rating at Prosper may only be rated a C or D at Lending Club because Lending Club's rating formula takes into account factors such as debt - to - income ratio and loan size.

Whilst I'm therefore pleased that he seems to be progressing well, because the ultimate goal of Wilshere's loan move is to improve his fitness and so he can get regular playing time, you can not tell me that a club of Arsenal's size, didn't think of perhaps reducing the number of hours he does on the training pitch?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Furthermore, because USDA home loans do not have a specific loan size limitation, home buyers can theoretically borrow more money with a USDA mortgage than via conventional, VA or FHA routes.

Our conversation with a loan officer revealed that the company charges lower margins for each mortgage and incurs less overhead because of its smaller size and lack of brick - and - mortar locations.

Though the payment size will certainly increase, if you can handle them, a 15 - year loan is definitely a consideration because of the long - term benefits.

What is more, the chances of securing loan approval are low because of the size of the monthly repayments on a $ 10,000 loan.

And because the risk of defaulting is statistically higher, the interest rate charged is higher and the size of the homeowner loan is smaller.

Loan size matters because of two considerations.

Even when securing a debt consolidation loan with bad credit, the loan sum is enough to clear all of the card balances and because the interest rate is smaller, and the loan term is longer, the size of the required monthly repayment is much lower than the combined minimum repayment sums.

In keeping with HUD's goals, there has always been a limit on the size of the loan the FHA will insure — because FHA primarily serves those purchasing relatively low - to - mid-priced homes.

So, okay our first recommendation we decided not to recommend was limiting loan sizes just because all that does is induce you to go to different lenders.

If they take on riskier loans, their RBC goes up even more rapidly, because loan quality is reflected (or, should be reflected) in RBC formulas prior to adjustment for bank size.

Because approval for these loans rest mainly on the size of the income the borrower has, applying for an unsecured personal loan for bad credit is seen as very easy.

In this example, rolling closing costs into the loan can not be not an option because the new loan size would exceed the maximum allowable loan size.

This is because the rating can affect the size of the loan available - the lower the rating, the lower the loan limit.

In an economic environment with steady monetary inflation, taking out a long - term loan backed by a tangible non-depreciating «permanent» asset (e.g. real estate) is in practice a form of investing not borrowing, because over time the monetary value of the asset will increase in line with inflation, but the size of the loan remains constant in money terms.

This is because lenders take into account your debt - to - income (or DTI) ratio when calculating the size of the loan they're willing to offer you, and your interest rate.

For example, in a rising rate environment, loan customers may not be able to meet interest payments because of the increase in the size of the payment or a reduction in earnings.

IDR is a great option because it takes your income, loan debt and family size into consideration.

Perhaps because of the sheer size of the request, or perhaps because of the political fall - out in Mississippi over the interest free state loan.

«Everyone knows about Quicken Loans, as they're dominant in the marketplace,» says Brooks, who initially shied away from working with the mortgage lender because of its size.

«The feedback I am hearing from the industry is that large loan single - asset securitization has been pretty popular so far this year, because life companies can only do a certain size loan.

Jumbo loans aren't backed by federal agencies and, because of their size, lenders have even more risk.

Further, basing coverage on whether real estate secures the transaction will facilitate compliance because creditors will not have to identify the size of the property before or upon receipt of an application to determine whether a Loan Estimate must be provided.