Not exact matches
Restore the
right of parents to direct their children's
education, and Keep control
of schools with the
local school
board, not with state or federal agencies.
For example: (1) teachers in charter schools have certification requirements as do other public schools; (2) charter schools are subject to academic standards set by the state; (3) charter schools must comply with
local, state, and federal laws related to health, safety and civil
rights; and (4) charter schools are «subject to the supervision
of the superintendent
of public instruction and the state
board of education.»
What I mean is that we must acknowledge that it took Brown v.
Board of Education and the Civil
Rights Act
of 1964 and the Voting
Rights Act
of 1965 — all bold federal authority overturning unjust
local practices — to enable many
of our fellow citizens to live freely.
The Secretary specifically invites advice and recommendations from State and
local education administrators, parents, teachers and teacher organizations, principals, other school leaders (including charter school leaders), paraprofessionals, members
of local boards of education, civil
rights and other organizations representing the interests
of students (including historically underserved students), representatives
of the business community, and other organizations involved with the implementation and operation
of title I programs.
• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and Federal Employment Law • School
Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative Law & Appeals
of State and Federal Agency Decisions and Actions • Special Investigations & Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School
Board Training • Litigation in Federal and State Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals Before State and Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting • Construction Law, AIA Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special
Education under IDEA and Section 504 • Student
Rights & Discipline Issues and Hearings • State and Federal Claims
of Discrimination • State and Federal Civil
Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for
Local Government Entities
True they are supporting legislation that undermines the
rights of their own
boards of education,
local elected officials and taxpayers but they must know what they are doing.
Taken together, Residents for a Better Bridgeport, StudentsFirst and Excel Bridgeport, a corporate sponsored
education reform group, appear to have spent more than half a million dollars to persuade Bridgeport voters to give up their right to choose who should serve on the local Board of E
education reform group, appear to have spent more than half a million dollars to persuade Bridgeport voters to give up their
right to choose who should serve on the
local Board of EducationEducation.
But their failure to do the
right thing shouldn't stop Connecticut's
local boards of education from standing up and speaking out the travesty being forced upon us by the overuse
of standardized testing.
On behalf
of parents
of public school students across Connecticut, I am writing to request that you add an agenda item to the April 6, 2015 State
Board of Education Committee meeting to review and address the actions taken by your Interim Commissioner
of Education and other State Department
of Education staff as they relate to the issue
of a parent's fundamental and inalienable
right to opt their children out
of the Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) testing program and how
local school districts should deal with children whose parents have opted them out
of the SBAC testing.
When the final reports were filed in Bridgeport, the corporate
education reform industry and its supporters spent more than $ 560,000, a state record, in their effort to take away the
right of local citizens to elect their own
board of education.
Even before the Legislature adopted the
Local Control Funding Formula, foster youth had the
right to receive partial credits for all work satisfactorily completed before transferring schools under
Education Code Sections 49069.5 and 51225.2, according to a resource guide developed by the Alliance for Children's
Rights in conjunction with the California Department
of Education, the Department
of Social Services, the California School
Boards Association and the Child Welfare Council.
Strategies: Develop policies and programs aimed at the recognition
of land and sea
rights; encourage
education to the wider community about the recognition
of land and sea
rights; liaise with government to ensure that there is Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representation on all
boards and advisory committees involved in land and sea management; develop land acquisition strategy; support Palm Island and other groups to prepare
local Homelands Plan.
REALTOR ® Members holding membership pursuant to Article III, Section 1 (C)(1)(ii)
of this Constitution shall be
Board Members
of the
local Board designated by them pursuant to that section
of the Constitution and
of the state association within whose jurisdiction that
local Board is located and shall enjoy all
of the
rights, privileges and obligations, including compliance with the Code
of Ethics,
of other REALTOR ® Members
of that state association and
local Board except: obligations related to mandatory
education, meeting attendance, or indoctrination classes or similar requirements; the
right to use the term REALTOR ® in connection with their franchise firm's name; and the
right to hold elective office in the
local Board or state association.