Sentences with phrase «local measures of student learning»

Working again with Dr. Hatch, Deirdre led a study of the NYCDOE Local Measures of Student Learning, which are used to evaluate teacher and student performance in New York City Schools.

- That the growth model (VAM) they were creating for the local measures of student learning component was a fair and excellent way to evaluate teachers because «In any class... you ought to be able to move kids from point A, wherever they began, to point B, someplace that showed some progress.»

Not exact matches

Local school districts and their unions may negotiate a second measure of student learning that would lead to other scoring outcomes.

Dr. Marzano will be on hand to discuss next - generation evaluation models, the most up - to - date research on evaluation and value - added measures of student achievement, and what has been learned as states implement federal and local directives to reform K - 12 teaching and learning.

Washington's high - risk designation specified that the State must submit, by May 1, 2014, final guidelines for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of ESEA flexibility, including requiring local educational agencies (LEAs) to use student achievement on CCR State assessments to measure student learning growth in those systems for teachers of tested grades and subjects.

The potential for these focused improvement plans to make a difference in the quality of student learning is highly dependent on the degree to which local educators are able to align local curriculum, teaching, and assessment practices with the external measures against which they are being held to account.

B. Base 80 % of teacher evaluation on student performance, leaving the following options for local school districts to select from: keeping the current local measures generating new assessments with performance — driven student activities, (performance - assessments, portfolios, scientific experiments, research projects) utilizing options like NYC Measures of Student Learning, and corresponding student growth mestudent performance, leaving the following options for local school districts to select from: keeping the current local measures generating new assessments with performance — driven student activities, (performance - assessments, portfolios, scientific experiments, research projects) utilizing options like NYC Measures of Student Learning, and corresponding student growth mmeasures generating new assessments with performance — driven student activities, (performance - assessments, portfolios, scientific experiments, research projects) utilizing options like NYC Measures of Student Learning, and corresponding student growth mestudent activities, (performance - assessments, portfolios, scientific experiments, research projects) utilizing options like NYC Measures of Student Learning, and corresponding student growth mMeasures of Student Learning, and corresponding student growth meStudent Learning, and corresponding student growth mestudent growth measuresmeasures.

For instance, university researchers at the Stanford University Graduate School of Education's John W. Gardner Center recently partnered with the California CORE districts — which include the Los Angeles Unified, Oakland Unified, Fresno Unified, Long Beach Unified, Santa Ana Unified, Sanger Unified, Garden Grove Unified, and Sacramento City Unified school districts — to design a new local school accountability system that included measures of students» social - emotional learning, growth mindset, self - efficacy, and school climate.51 Researchers found that these measures were predictive of students» test performance and correlated with other important academic and behavioral outcomes.52

In addition, since these assessments are self - report surveys, there is also the issue of response bias — meaning a student's tendency to give answers that they believe are socially acceptable or to consistently answer «yes» or «no» regardless of the question asked.48 Since self - report measures tend to be weak in reliability and validity, state and local policymakers should refrain from including measures of learning mindsets and skills in high - stakes accountability systems.

The report recommends that measures of students» social and emotional competencies are best used at the local level to inform teaching, learning, and program investments.

Hawley neatly summed up the emerging situation: «My fellow colleagues and I who serve as principals know that being held accountable for student achievement is an important part of our job, but measures of student achievement must be comprehensive and accurately reflect the local context in all dimensions of student learning.»

There are a variety of resources that can assist university personnel, administrators, and coordinators of gifted programs at state and local levels in implementing the new CCSS for gifted learners, including assessments that measure the depth and breadth of a student's knowledge within a domain of talent development; curriculum units of study that are already differentiated and research - based; instructional strategies that employ the use of higher - order thinking skills; and programming options that include acceleration, enrichment, and extended learning beyond the classroom.

NAESP is pleased to have played a role in creating the opportunities that are now afforded to schools under the new law, such as allowing accountability systems to include multiple measures, factoring in elements other than test scores; conducting needs assessments for struggling schools and learning communities facing the greatest challenges; developing clear and concise plans for targeting federal funding in ways that meet the needs of students in the school; and implementing local programs and monitoring their progress in collaboration with educators.

The report recommends that measures of students» social and emotional competencies are best used at the local level to inform teaching, learning, and program investments.