The latest round of increases in state and
local pension bills, announced by the comptroller on Aug. 31, will only add to the pressure on localities.
Not exact matches
Palatine homeowners will see higher property tax
bills in order to pay for higher
local pension costs, as well as a dip in state funding.
More than 90
pension - and benefit - sweetener
bills have been introduced in the state Legislature that could cost state and
local governments at least $ 200 million.
These
bills provide various
pension and payroll benefits to State and
local workers but provide no funding to pay for them.
The
bill allowing all veterans to buy added
pension time was vetoed by Cuomo last year because, notwithstanding a clause in the governor's Tier 6
pension reform, it failed to appropriate money to cover the projected state and
local government share of the «past service» catch - up cost of the measure.
Schumer, the Senate minority leader, and King met with Teamsters
Local 707 in Hempstead to push for the
bill, which could help fund
pensions for 4,500 Long Island families, including more than 3,700 retirees, Schumer said.
When investment returns tanked during the great recession,
local governments were forced to pay more of this
pension bill.
Cuomo's veto message on Friday said the
bill would create $ 57 million in «near - term commitments» for
local governments by failing to establish a state funding stream for the added
pension time.
More than 90
pension - and benefit - sweetener
bills have been introduced that could cost state and
local governments at least $ 200 million.
After holding it for four months, the state Senate has just sent Governor Andrew Cuomo a
bill that would add hundreds of millions of dollars * to state and
local pension costs by allowing public employees to claim
pension service credit for time spent in peacetime military duty.
Officials said that's led to some of the highest property taxes in the country as
local governments struggle to keep up with their exploding
pension bills.
Calling it an «oppressive unfunded mandate» that would impose $ 57 million in «near term obligations» on
local governments across New York State, Governor Cuomo has vetoed a
bill that would have allowed public employees to claim up to three years worth of
pension service credit for time spent in military duty.
The result is that
local government workers, faced with an average additional 3 % increase in their contributions which will then yield a much reduced
pensions, are likely to abandon the
local government
pension scheme in droves as no longer worthwhile, thus adding to the State's welfare
bill in retirement and perhaps collapsing the investment funds which this
pension scheme feeds.
He introduced a
bill last month to strip
pensions from state and
local public officials convicted of a felony if the crime is a «breach of public trust.»
Beth Newcomer The Legislative Analyst for NYC Council Member Helen Rosenthal (District 6, Upper West Side) encouraged attendees to reach out to their
local Council Members and urge them to support the following legislative initiatives: • Possible legislation regarding divestment of the city's
pension funds from fossil fuel companies • A
bill to require the city to do a carbon footprint analysis of all the products the city procures, and to use that analysis to inform a policy of low - carbon operations • A number of
bills to reduce the carbon emissions of city - owned vehicles and improve the sustainability of city buildings • A
bill to enhance the city's already - strong idling laws so as to make them easier to enforce Find your Council Member here.
Broadly, the
bill would clear the way for voters to amend the state constitution to block «any state or
local officer» from collecting a public
pension if he or she is convicted of «a felony involving a breach of the public trust.»
This reduced funding, argued proponents of the
bill, could be offset at the district level by employee contributions to health - care and
pension programs as well as savings gained by
local school districts exercising greater autonomy over spending.
A group of active and retired Chicago city employees and four unions that represent them — AFSCME Council 31, the Chicago Teachers Union, the Illinois Nurses Associations and Teamsters
Local 700 — filed suit today in Cook County Circuit Court to overturn Senate
Bill 1922 (Public Act 98 - 0641), legislation to sharply reduce
pension benefits for city workers and retirees who participate in the Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund (MEABF).
McGee says there is an argument to be made that
local taxpayers should bear some of the
pension costs, but suggests that states pick up the
bills in order to mitigate any financial harm to school districts.