Many argue that the resistance from
local public school bureaucracies shows that the only way to create genuine alternatives for children in weak schools is to provide them with private school vouchers.
Not exact matches
Many people believe education is best run at the
local level because
school boards and
school officials better serve the
public when they are able to be held accountable by the
local community they serve; when the decision - makers have
local roots, many believe they do a better job than a monolithic federal
bureaucracy hundreds or thousands of miles away.
So
local government officials are teaming up with leaders from business, labor,
schools, and neighborhood groups to figure out how to shrink the layers of
public bureaucracy in Onondaga County.
To the best of our knowledge, and based on all evidence that we're aware of, neither the signers of the Shanker Institute manifesto, nor leaders in the Obama / Duncan Education Department, advocate a «nationalized curriculum» that would «undermine control of
public school curriculum and instruction at the
local and state level» and «transfer control to an elephantine, inside - the - Beltway
bureaucracy.»
The only material difference between charter and traditional
public schools is that the latter are not part of the
local school - governance
bureaucracy, whether a
school board, a mayor or even a state - appointed superintendent.
Proponents say charter
schools allow
local educators to escape the smothering
bureaucracy that entangles other
public schools and to find creative solutions that help struggling students.
State departments /
bureaucracies write guidance and policy to govern
local public schools.
«Assessment systems need to make
public schools accountable to parents, students and the
local community rather than to distant government
bureaucracies,» the report concludes.