Sentences with phrase «local rules of the court»

At each one of these locations, you need access to relevant, location - specific information, such as local rules of the court.

While s. 17 of the Act preserves the applicability of the local rules of court except where inconsistent, it is circular reasoning, as the court in Cegir noted, to use that section to interpret s. 9 — as the court did in Ritter.

The centers that offer forms packets usually also provide the local rules of the court that you must follow.

«Nothing entitles the Defendant to engraft his own conditions on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court, or to dispense with them where they fail to suit his counsel's teaching style,» she said in no uncertain terms.

The Circuit Court of Montgomery: Revised Local Rules of Court Regulating Divorce Practice and Procedure

Our San Diego Superior Court family court website includes links to the state and local rules of court, courtroom judicial assignments and telephone numbers to court clerks and various administrative offices, hearing calendars, a video designed to familiarize parents with the Family Court Services mediation process that is required when there are child custody or visitation issues, Judicial Council pleadings forms, and an index of cases filed in the San Diego Superior Court during the last several decades.

Not exact matches

In 2000 the Supreme Court ruled (in Christensen v. Harris County that local government can compel employees to take accumulated comp time rather than take it at any time of their choosing.

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters)- France is entitled to bring criminal proceedings against local managers of ride - hailing app Uber for running an illegal taxi service, the EU top court ruled on Tuesday, dealing the Silicon Valley start - up another legal setback.

China's top court has ruled in favor of French fashion house Christian Dior in a perfume bottle trademark case, and rapped the local trademark office for rejecting an application by the firm.

In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as court said that protection applies at a local level as well.

The present ruling reflects the Court's growing deference to the decisions of state and local government, a deference that many Americans welcome.

Of course, the American Beverage Association and a local group, Philadelphians Against the Grocery Tax, have already announced they plan to take the ruling to court.

A Sri Lankan court on Wednesday issued a summons to Fonterra Brands Lanka, the local company of New Zealand's Fonterra and four of its top officials to face contempt of court charges for not adhering to an earlier ruling that banned sales and advertising  of all Fonterra milk products.

In June 2017, the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas ruled that the tax is lawful, following an appeal by the American Beverage Association, local restaurants and merchant associations.

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of New Jersey, the impact won't stay local.

The high court ruling simply clarified that local authorities have no power to hold prayers as part of their formal meetings or to summon councillors to such a meeting at which prayers are on the agenda.

The states «have a substantial interest in avoiding the vast disruption in state and local labor relations that would occur if the Court were now to overrule Abood's approval of public sector collective bargaining arrangements utilizing agency - fee rules,» lawyers for the states argue.

The Appellate Division of State Supreme Court has ruled that the Orange County Legislature was wrong when it voted by a simple majority to create a local development corporation to sell the county's Valley View nursing home.

The bills include A. 5873 / S.4284, which will ensure that public meetings are held in facilities that are able to accommodate members of the public; A. 10093 / S.3195, which will require State and local governments to establish rules to accommodate photographs, audio or video recording of open meetings; and A. 10196 / S.7054, which will add to the remedies a court can impose when it finds a violation of the Open Meetings Law.

A Court of Appeals ruling will continue to allow local governments to ban hydrofracking within the borders of a municipality.

Dozens of local - level candidates this season have been denied or knock off the ballot line after a state Supreme Court judge ruled no one had control of the party because a majority of the statewide candidates are yet to sign off on rules for the WEP.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

Local fans of online daily fantasy sports websites are on the sidelines, following a State Supreme Court judge's ruling to block such sites from doing business within New York State.

But the Upper East Regional Minister, Rockson Bukari, has debunked the allegations, stating that, he was only acting on a directive from the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development following an Accra High court ruling on the matter.

National Legal Adviser of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Muiz Banire (SAN), has lambasted Lagos Chairman, Dele Ajomale, on his comment regarding the court ruling that upturned the position of the party on its candidate for the upcoming local government election in the State for Odi Olowo Local Council Development local government election in the State for Odi Olowo Local Council Development Local Council Development Area.

In a 5 - to - 2 ruling, New York's highest court has upheld the right of local governments to ban hydrofracking within their borders.

Second, Washington's high court ruled that «charter schools are devoid of local control» over educational issues because an elected school board does not govern them.

The New York State Court of Appeals, in a June 23 ruling overturning three lower state courts, acknowledged that school districts» heavy reliance on local property taxes puts poor districts at a disadvantage, but found that the inequities do not violate the state or federal constitutions.

Colorado educators and policymakers are grappling with the potential implications of a recent state supreme court ruling on charter schools that highlights tensions between state and local control.

Los Angeles teachers who are not members of the local teachers» union can avoid paying for union activities unrelated to collective bargaining only if they object in writing, a federal appeals court has ruled.

In that case, the high court ruled that the state's heavy reliance on local property taxes for funding public education violated the state constitution's guarantee of an adequate education for New Hampshire children.

Before the 21st century, he notes, the federal government did not tell states and local school districts how to run their schools, with the exception of areas like desegregation and special education where there had been court rulings.

The Supreme Court's ruling on vouchers sanctioned a hands - off market approach to schooling while the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) laid the heaviest federal hand on state and local control of schools in U.S. history.

Beginning 40 years ago, a series of court rulings forced states to reallocate money for education, giving more to schools in poor neighborhoods with less in the way of local resources.

Relying on the 1909 ruling created a fundamental problem for the court: the state constitution nowhere requires «complete control» of common schools by local school boards.

The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled in December 1997 that the current system of paying for education with local property taxes was inequitable — and unconstitutional — and ordered the legislature to fix the problem by April 1 of this year.

«We urge the Court to grant the preliminary injunction and rule in favor of the best interests of Nevada's public school students and local communities.»

In advance of the Court's order, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) and the Nevada Association of School Boards (NASB) filed an amicus, «friend of the court,» brief, urging the court to do just that, and rule in favor of the best interests of Nevada's public school students and local communiCourt's order, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) and the Nevada Association of School Boards (NASB) filed an amicus, «friend of the court,» brief, urging the court to do just that, and rule in favor of the best interests of Nevada's public school students and local communicourt,» brief, urging the court to do just that, and rule in favor of the best interests of Nevada's public school students and local communicourt to do just that, and rule in favor of the best interests of Nevada's public school students and local communities.

In Georgia, the high court ruled May 16 that the 2008 law creating the Georgia Charter Schools Commission conflicted with a provision of the state constitution granting local boards of education «exclusive control» over general K - 12 schools.

For example, it fails to consider Hunter v. Pittsburgh, the century - old U.S. Supreme Court ruling that essentially renders districts (as well as other local governments) as subservient to state government, essentially making the very concept of local control a fiction.

The 2nd United States Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week on an appeal by several convicted former bosses of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 348 who were convicted in 2012 of various racketeering - related crimes.

In February, a High Court judge ruled that the the decision to axe projects in six local authority areas was «unlawful» because of a lack of consultation.

Isle of Wight Council, as the local education authority, took the case to London's High Court but senior judges backed the magistrates» ruling in favour of the father.

We're releasing the 2018 Local School Finance Study at a time of intense focus on how public schools are funded in North Carolina, including a new General Assembly Joint Legislative Task Force on Education Finance Reform, the Governor's Commission on Access to Sound Basic Education, the My Future NC Commission and a pending court ruling in the 20 + year old Leandro case.

The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco ruled this week that when the state board of education considers authorizing a statewide benefit charter to open a site in a new area, they must first take into account whether the proposed educational program can be approved at the local level.

We've reached out to our local legislators, several of whom toured the school and sponsored bills aiming to remedy the state Supreme Court ruling that overturned the charter law.

With all the attention on school layoffs this month comes a recent ruling from the California Court of Appeal further clarifying the duties of a local educational agency when it comes to distinguishing probationary» employees from «temporary» employees.»

«(d) CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS - Until such time as rules are adopted under chapter 131 of this title providing for the confidentiality of alternative dispute resolution processes under this chapter, each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), provide for the confidentiality of the alternative dispute resolution processes and to prohibit disclosure of confidential dispute resolution communications.».

«(a) CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN APPROPRIATE CASES - Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), require that litigants in all civil cases consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in the litigatioOF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN APPROPRIATE CASES - Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), require that litigants in all civil cases consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in the litigatioof law to the contrary and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), require that litigants in all civil cases consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in the litigatioof an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in the litigation.

«(b) AUTHORITY - Each United States district court shall authorize, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a), the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in all civil actions, including adversary proceedings in bankruptcy, in accordance with this chapter, except that the use of arbitration may be authorized only as provided in section 654.