Urbanization typically contributes to
local warming due to the asphalt effect, when paving and buildings absorb and convert into heat sunlight that would naturally have been reflected back into space.
Tropical forest removal leads to
local warming due to reduction in latent heat fluxes [24] and also alters hydrometeorology in mid - and northern latitudes [15,25].
Not exact matches
Previous studies by the Cardiff team on
warming effects in the Rivers Wye and Tywi reveal significant reductions in insect numbers and even an instance of
local species extinction
due to climate change.
By 2100, the
local composition of the oceans may also look very different
due to
warming water: The model predicts that many phytoplankton species will move toward the poles.
For the Moscow heat record of July 2010, they found that the probability of a record had increased five-fold
due to the
local climatic
warming trend, as compared to a stationary climate (see our previous articles The Moscow
warming hole and On record - breaking extremes for further discussion).
The question I have is how much of the current AMO
warming period is due to a faster local effect of Anthropogenic Global W
warming period is
due to a faster
local effect of Anthropogenic Global
WarmingWarming?
Thus much more than 1C of the extreme heat could be
due to global
warming because of this
local effect.
BUT Reversing the Atlantic ocean current
due to fresh water ice melt, is a
local phenomenon, not global AND it does little to reduce the slow steady heat / energy buildup globally — so
warming will continue.
«I just happen to be publishing an article by a scientist who lives on Tuvalu and who shows that the real problems already being experienced by people there (salination, sinking because of sand excavation) while ascribed by politicians seeking aid to global
warming, are in fact
due to over population, natural
local causes and above (sic) development on what is little more than a floating patch of sand in the Pacific.»
One of the motivations for this paper (18 pages of close - spaced comparison and discussion of the CRUTem2v, ERA - 40 and NCEP / NCAR analysis) was the claim by Kalnay and Cai (2003) that much of the reported
warming over North America was
local and
due to urbanization and land use changes (based on NCAR / NCEP).
Some had regions of minimum
warming in the North Atlantic and Ross Sea
due to positive feedbacks: a
local effect on convection in the Ross Sea and a non-
local impact on the meridional circulation in the North Atlantic.
The authors find that, without adaptation, projected corn, rice and wheat production is reduced when areas experience 2.0 °C or more of
local warming, with losses greater in the second half of the century
due to larger changes in climate.
This is a view shared by Prof Peter Nienow, a glaciologist at the University of Edinburgh, who said: «The significant
warming being seen in many places across the planet makes it unlikely that the recent
warming reported in this paper is
due just to
local natural variability.»
The late 20th century divergence is partly
due to
local anthropogenic
warming and partly to other factors, such as longterm multicentennial linear trend in solar cycle frequency (thermal inertia of oceans and ice).
How hurricanes develop also depends on how the
local atmosphere responds to changes in
local sea surface temperatures, and this atmospheric response depends critically on the cause of the change.23, 24 For example, the atmosphere responds differently when
local sea surface temperatures increase
due to a
local decrease of particulate pollution that allows more sunlight through to
warm the ocean, versus when sea surface temperatures increase more uniformly around the world
due to increased amounts of human - caused heat - trapping gases.25, 26,27,28
BUT, other important / related parameters — BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function)-- albedo i. /: 00 solar
local time Neural network based on CYCLOPES and MODIS / wrong ALSO Need to make assumptions about carbon lost via respiration to go from GPP to / Cox et al. (2000) Acceleration of global
warming due to carbon - cycle feedbacks in a coupled / / JRC / FastOpt: http://www.fastopt.com/topics/publications.htmlhttp://www.fastopt.com/topics/publications.html 50 0 = water; 1 /
The question at which Parker's study was addressed was the question: «Could the global
warming apparent in the record of land - based temperatures be
due to an increase over time in the
local UHI effects?»
How hurricanes develop also depends on how the
local atmosphere responds to changes in
local sea surface temperatures, and this atmospheric response depends critically on the cause of the change.23, 24 For example, the atmosphere responds differently when
local sea surface temperatures increase
due to a
local decrease of particulate pollution that allows more sunlight through to
warm the ocean, versus when sea surface temperatures increase more uniformly around the world
due to increased amounts of human - caused heat - trapping gases.18, 25,26,27 So the link between hurricanes and ocean temperatures is complex.
There are a number of man - made contributory factors that may have had specific impacts on the atmospheric heating, e.g.
local warming in the cities (
due to housing, roads, and other resultant factors), smoke and dust over long distances or deforestation of huge forest areas.
Clearly human activities can affect climates — we all grew up learning that the desertification of much of North Africa was
due to goats, and we know that some
local climates are determined by human activities in the region — but human activity is unlikely to have caused the Viking period
warming, the great cooling after 1300, the Little Ice Age, and such; and the
warming beginning in 1800 or so is very unlikely to have been caused by human activities.
According to Stone, cases where the link between human - generated greenhouse gas emissions and
local warming trends were weak were often
due to the fact that the climate observational record was insufficient in those regions to build a clear picture about what has been happening over the past several decades.
Spatial shifts of marine species
due to projected
warming will cause high - latitude invasions and high
local - extinction rates in the tropics and semi-enclosed seas (medium confidence).
A) the
local has more noise which can appear as volitility B) the
local enviroment he has selected tend to have muted volitility
due to unique geographic considerations C) he looked at the wrong measure D) There are good reasons to expect less volitility in a
warming scenario.
The paper's investigation also couldn't find corroboration of what Chinese scientists turned over to American scientists, leaving unanswered, «how much of the
warming seen in recent decades is
due to the
local effects of spreading cities, rather than global
warming?»
We updated version A after discovering that the eastward drift of NOAA - 11 over its 6 - yr life span caused a spurious
warming effect to develop
due, as we believed, to the fact the satellite was sampling the earth at later times during the
local diurnal cycle (version B, Christy et al. 1995).»
However, the atmosphere is unbounded, so if there were even a small amount of
local heating occurs
due to absorbing IR, the
warmer air would rises and then cool by adiabatic expansion.
Sea level rise
due to global
warming has already doubled the annual risk of coastal flooding of historic proportions across widespread areas of the United States... By 2030, many locations are likely to see storm surges combining with sea level rise to raise waters at least 4 feet above the
local high - tide line.
[Response: Your argument misses the point in three different and important ways, not even considering whether or not the Black Hills data have any general applicability elsewhere, which they may or may not: (1) It ignores the point made in the post about the potential effect of previous, seasonal
warming on the magnitude of an extreme event in mid summer to early fall,
due to things like (especially) a depletion in soil moisture and consequent accumulation of degree days, (2) it ignores that biological sensitivity is far FAR greater during the
warm season than the cold season for a whole number of crucial variables ranging from respiration and photosynthesis to transpiration rates, and (3) it ignores the potential for derivative effects, particularly fire and smoke, in radically increasing the
local temperature effects of the heat wave.
But one modeling study put the threshold level for the eventual near - complete loss of Greenland's ice sheet at a
local warming of just 2.7 C — which,
due to Arctic amplification, means a global
warming of only 1.2 C. Total melting of Greenland — luckily, something that would likely take centuries — would raise sea levels by 7 meters, submerging Miami and most of Manhattan, as well as large chunks of London, Shanghai, Bangkok and Mumbai.