The same University of Michigan study found that relying too much on «
local weather observations» can be an impediment to understanding the worldwide reality of climate change.
Not exact matches
I also used surface
observations and climatological data from Albany International Airport and a report from a
local volunteer
weather observer.
They used a combination of field
observations and data from
local weather stations to test a model of glacier change over the past 50 years.
Requires the Climate Service Program to: (1) analyze the effects of
weather and climate on communities; (2) carry out
observations, data collection, and monitoring of atmospheric and oceanic conditions; (3) provide information and technical support to governmental efforts to assess and respond to climate variability and change; (4) develop systems for the management and dissemination of data; (5) conduct research to improve forecasting and understanding of
weather and climate variability and change and its effects on communities; and (6) develop tools to facilitate the use of climate information by
local and regional stakeholders.
In addition to treating cloud transmission based only on the measurements at the
local time of the TOMS
observations, the results from other satellites and
weather assimilation models can be used to estimate atmospheric UV irradiance transmission throughout the day.
The answer to their effective question — are very
local single realisations of
weather coherent across
observations and models?