Sentences with phrase «logic was a part of it»

If you have ever achieved a goal, you did so through faith, and logic was a part of it.

Not exact matches

If someone wants to be part of the world's largest hedge fund, they will typically go through around five hours of personality surveys, a verbal logic assessment, and a thorough personal interview.

The experiment, which Westen wrote about in his book «The Political Brain,» showed that, when people begin to feel their worldview is under attack, the parts of their brains that handle reason and logic go to sleep, while the parts of their brain responsible for our fight - or - flight response light up.

But part of the logic behind supporting ownership is that it's for society.

And I cherish my role of being difficult to persuade about strategic moves without strong data or logic or conviction on your part.

Defying conventional logic, his research showed that weak ties are actually more influential in parts of our lives than strong ties (e.g. getting a job).

This book uses a ratio of about one part storytelling to three parts reason, argument and logic, which is roughly the amount of storytelling you should be aiming for when communicating with your people.

The logic of contrary opinion is flawless; gathering the information is the difficult part.

The development process of their projects wasn't affected in any way by the new Chinese laws, but if you bend the logic in some way, you can interpret people's reaction based on Singapore's geographical proximity to China and the lack of knowledge in some parts of the world about the relationship between Singapore and China.

That was the logic Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback and his advisers used in 2012 when they carved out a part of the state tax code that didn't tax pass - through entities:

«The decision on home cultivation of up to four plants was based on logic and evidence and it's one that we will continue to establish as part of the federal framework,» he said.

(This next part takes some logic so brace yourself) By making that part of your arguement you are implying a connection between what you said and what I said.

Even if you will follow the cyclical logic that causes you to confuse fiction as fact, Genesis 6 is one of the most telling parts of the Old Testament.

Yet he himself explicitly is committed to the concept of a whole or unity as an assembly of parts which, either in fine art or in nature, may be disjoined and reunited by logic alone (MT 85).

We have here an updated version of Kant's criticism of the Leibnizian monad in the «Amphiboly» in the Critique of Pure Reason: the spatially situated existent is indeed made up of relations rather than being a substance containing its «inhering» attributes internally as predicates which are part of its concept; only the relations are no longer those of the synthetically connected manifold, but the relational connections between the particulars of modern functional or mathematical logic, expanded to include within itself the spatial and temporal relations which Kant could only account for by means of the synthetic a priori.

The postulate that life originates purely by chance out of mindless and aimless shuffling of atoms and molecules is all part of our central question here concerning the logic of an emergent view of nature.

If the first part is faulty then the rest of the logic fails.

But the logic of change requires actual entities be wholes that create object / parts for other wholes.

Accordingly, to ask about the truth of theological proposals is in part to raise questions about the «logic» of the types of speech and action that comprise the Christian thing.

science is not everything, the problem is when the critical and objective philosophy of science is accepted as absolute in reality.God is beyond logic at this point of our consciousness, The process of gods will manfistation is evolution which accepts all variables in the process, the input could be not what scienctists wants.Thats why faith or religion is part of reality.

Christianity, for its part, is not so much a new thing as a prolonged episode within the greater history of nihilism, notable chiefly for having brought part of this history's logic to its consummation by having invented the metaphysical God, the form of all forms, who grounds all of being in himself as absolute efficient cause, and who personifies that cause as total power and will.

John, I accept (for the most part) your reasoning, but not your final paragraph - I think that is an unjustified leap of logic.

Perhaps the most interesting part is where she claims that «by the simple logic of cause and effect, there had to be an agent — separate and apart from the effect — that caused it.»

Wayne C. Lusvardi is right to underscore that certain things» unborn children, for instance, or body parts, or drugs» shouldn't be subject to the logic of choice that prevails in a free market.

The proof that the growing co-extension of our soul and the world, through the consciousness of our relationship with all things, is not simply a matter of logic or idealisation, but is part of an organic process, the natural outcome of the impulse which caused the germination of life and the growth of the brain — the proof is that it expresses itself in a specific evolution of the moral value of our actions (that is to say, by the modification of what is most living within us).

The main point is that the inclusivist can read the second part of this paper as an attempt to understand cohesive nexus in terms of the logic of relations.

Since the logic of relations is neutral between these competing views about the metaphysics of nexus, my hope is that those who disagree with my interpretation will still find the second part helpful.

The metaphysics of nexus needs to be thoroughly discussed before that logic can be utilized adequately Accordingly, this paper is divided into two parts: in the first part, «The Metaphysics of Nexus,» the text of Process and Reality is examined in order to try to determine what White - head understood nexus to be; in the second part, «The Mathematics of Nexus,» nexus are interpreted in terms of the logic of relations.

The part of the brain that advance was our ability ot feel emotion and use logic.

Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very flawed with his logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.

Logic is not a part of religion.

This is a sad fact of which we are all aware, and because of this separation of head and heart we are bound to conclude that, however social necessity and logic may impel it from behind, the human mass will only become thoroughly unified under the influence of some form of affective energy which will place the human particles in the happy position of being unable to love and fulfill themselves individually except by contributing in some degree to the love and fulfillment of all; to the extent, that is to say, that all are equal and integral parts of a single universe that is vitally converging.

But as a matter of logic, infanticide is quite conceivable, and empirically it so happens that infanticide continues to be an intractable part of the human record.

Oh, I forget logic is not part of religion.

Some churches in the Bible belt are quick to say that floods and earthquakes in other parts of the country or world are punishments from God, but the logic would have to apply to the storms in their areas too.

madtown, The evolutionary process that effect His will is not interventionary in its process, it follows the law of nature, God is not Human, we are only part of Him, our wisdom is infinitesimaly small, The reason is beyond us, just like History, it is only after thousands or millions of years that we understood why it happened, for example, Why the dynasours got extinct, millions of years ago, to pave the way for smaller animals and ultimately humans, Thats why to apply the present human logic on history is illogically simplistic.

The coherence of the argument (not a closed one, like a system of logic, but open, like a method or key to progressive research) is such that I believe only solid, positive reasons can lead to its rejection; and for my part I can see none that is adequate.

For example, I have not been part of those that have attended «seminary», and yet (in discussions with seminarians) I am welcomed to ask questions and share my logic and evidences, and ask them to support their position.

In The Logic of Perfection, as part of his argument against determinism, Hartshorne writes that «plural freedom can not be ordered (no matter by whom) save approximately and statistically» (LP 189).

only if the snot blowing out of your nose has a brain (parts of yours from being loosened up by idiotic reason and logic?)

Nii, it is becoming obvious that at least part of the reason you write heaps of drivel is because you can not read and comprehend, or follow logic.

Logic and reason and evidence is an integral component PART of faith, it is not opposite from it.

It is difficult for us to understand the non-theistic notion of Buddhism because the personalistic idea of God plays such a fundamental part in our Western logic.

But the fallacy of distribution, in any good book of elementary logic, is to apply terms, especially negative ones, appropriate to a whole (or totality) inappropriately to all its parts (or members) as well.

Such legal logic depends entirely on the premise that the child - to - be is part of the mother's body.

If you continue to utilize the logic of a book written eons ago as your moral barometer, you better be willing to accept the whole thing, not just parts of it you prefer.

Q: Dave, All logic would say that the hottest part of a chile is the capsaicin glands themselves, since this is where the capsaicinoids are produced.

I can't fathom what logic you used to get to that conclusion, trusting in young players is part of our identity!

This goes against traditional logic which indicates that bettors should avoid fly ball prone pitchers in the mile - high air, but that's part of the contrarian philosophy at Sports Insights.

You can not have a manager who still believes that having most of the possession should win you the game... That is not part of the logic in football anymore (well in modern football).