Sentences with phrase «logical answer to all of»

So it seems like the logical answer to all of these data points would be to be to ramp up your social media presence across as many platforms as possible, right?

Not exact matches

You do this by thinking through all the objections that a qualified prospect might make, then develop logical, complete answers to each of these objections so you're prepared if and when they come up.

If you are a seeker of link building services, and are evaluating companies or persons to help with your link building strategies and tactics, it's logical and reasonable to have some questions you want answers for.

The answer to the puzzle of why people don't do what is logical and beneficial for the individual and the team, lies deeper than you might think.

hawaiiguest Perhaps you fear ridicule when your answer betrays what you felt has been a logical and reasoned approach to discredit the authority of the Bible.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Some of these questions, I've asked pastors, elders, over and over again, and no one seems to be able to give me an answer that's COMPLETELY sound and all the way logical.

It's not surprising that you would support him / her since NEITHER of you can come up with ANY LOGICAL ANSWERS to the questions.

Man - made hypothesis of where we came from, such as from evolution (saying that proteins formed in a «prebiotic soup» and then «joining hands» with DNA, so that eventually a living cell is born), is not satisfying nor does it provide logical answers as to how the quality of love came about nor a conscience, that literally means «co-knowledge» in Greek.

The answer to this question can not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.

Logic points to a Creator outside of time and space and there is no other logical answer.

Although such a doctrine of an immortal soul is usually appealed to in order to answer questions about the meaning of death, it is logical to assert that the soul, whose existence is independent of the body, may therefore originate independently from the body.

But mere familiarity is not enough, for it does not answer the fundamental question: if the causal relation is identified with the relation of logical implication in which the premises imply the conclusion, is it possible to obtain any temporal sequence at all without surreptitiously borrowing it from experience?

The persuasive way to read Pascal's original is as a performance argument and a prayer, but, taken as a flat set of logical possibilities, it has an answer in the extremely unlikely possibility that God rewards disbelief or that God punishes belief.

The only logical answer to the question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same answer initially given by the atheist or any person, to the question who will be the first person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.

Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later, by men of equal imperfectness and religious biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in writing what the wrote, completely implausible?

But the solution to the problem of whether the preservation of all values is a logical implicate of Whitehead's principles (and whether the idea is empirically valid) is at least partly dependent on the answers that are given to these concepts: (A) «elimination» (which involves «negative prehensions»); (B) «objective immortality»; and (C) the «incompatibility of values.»

You're fearful because your arguments are built on foundational leaps of faith that science must fail itself in order for the rest of it to be true, rather than the simple and logical answer that there must be a creator.

When his disciples finally approach him at the end of the day with the logical, intelligent suggestion that he dismiss the crowd so they may go find some food, Jesus answers, «They need not go away; you give them something to eat.»

This process model of divine spacetime, projected from Whitehead's theory of interpoints and his critique of the Newtonian fallacy of «simple location,» slips into the logical difficulty with which process theology has accused traditional theism: It is always possible to ask whether any proposed empirical signs are signs of God, and it is never possible to provide empirical evidence with which to answer the question (1:42).

The answers usually proffered for what we see as basic logical flaws in Christianity — «you have been blinded by your lack of faith» «God moves in mysterious ways» «God is outside the Universe» or «our minds are too small to understand the greatness of God» are never satisfying to us.

A lot of platitudes, like «hate the sin but love the sinner» or, I don't know the all the answers, but I'm sure God knows (which when given as a response to logical questions that are challenging theology, isn't really an answer at all).

On one side, there's the «logical» and «rational» camp who think they know absolutely, beyond a shadow of a doubt that they have the answers to everything.

This is one kind of answer to the challenge of the logical empiricists who claim that there can be no verification of assertions about God.

There may well be a logical answer to that which I am unaware of, but it's a bit like saying let's celebrate the life and influence of Queen Victoria in 1950 (she died in 1901).

Also, beware of the logical fallacy of «it exists, therefore it is the best», as this answer seems to engage in.

The only logical answer is that they answer to a higher authority than the Republican leadership of the state Senate.

We tend to think of problem - solving as the implementation of logical steps toward an answer that is predetermined and inevitable.

After realizing that most people aren't getting enough to begin with, the logical answer once you have gotten your sun exposure for the day... get out of the sun!

Democratic habits of the sort we laid out at Central Park East can be taught in the process of learning math with its powerful logical habits, its attentiveness to patterns, as well as its multiple approaches to getting «right answers.»

It was a perfectly logical answer for someone who liked maps but was used to seeing them pinned to the front of a classroom rather than actually using them to get places.

The lesson follows a clear and logical learning journey, involving progressively more challenging tasks in which students: - Portray their understanding of witches and witchcraft; - Learn more about witches in a historical context through a fun «true or false» game; - Define, identify, and understand dramatic irony; - Read sections of Macbeth and complete tasks to demonstrate their understanding; - Answer key questions about the witches that test their knowledge in relation to each of the English assessment outcomes; - Evaluate a modelled example of an analytical paragraph in relation to the witches; - Analyse the witches» characteristics in their own responses; - Evaluate each others» analytical responses.

There is no logical answer to this question; it is an artifact of an outdated retirement system designed long ago for a different kind of work force.

The stir - up in Barnes & Noble's tablet lineup is a logical answer to Amazon's recent price cuts and launch of Kindle Fire.

The answer is very simple, when a student writes the coursework essay, they learn to express themselves more in a logical way and that can develop the writing skills of the students as well.

If one big question is looming over the logical explanation why many local publishers are still relevant to the publishing scene, one answer that can shroud over curiosity is the ability to understand the needs of the market in its original form and communicative language.

The expert management assignment tutors of StudentsAssignmentHelp.com have a high - profile past performance in this area and prominent for offering elongated and logical answers to your operations management assignment problems.

To satisfy both the logical and emotional side of our brain, we not only have to complete the equation, we have to fully accept the answeTo satisfy both the logical and emotional side of our brain, we not only have to complete the equation, we have to fully accept the answeto complete the equation, we have to fully accept the answeto fully accept the answer.

«Written by more than 75 experts, well structured, it provides clear and logical answers to most of the problems likely to occur in the business and usually, in around 5 minutes reading.

I racked my brain to think of a somewhat logical answer to tell everyone else around me (apparently, traveling for the sake of trying new food is no longer valid!).

Read this Forbes article discussing the profile of a middle - seat preferer, and you'll see that the only logical answer is to do away with the seat completely.

Poised at the starting line, you become painfully aware of how much time is passing you by as you look for a logical answer to the question: «Where do I start?»

Conclusion If we follow George Box's scientific advice, then a logical, unifying, next step for «stadium wave» models is to collaborate with computational / mechanistic global climate models to answer this simple question: By appropriate adjustment of parameters, can mechanistic climate models exhibit stadium waves?

Jim D and many other Urgent Mitigationists seem constitutionally unable to understand the perfectly logical process of arguing in the alternative, i.e. «I don't believe that your general approach is valid, but if I use it anyway it still comes up with the opposite answer to the one you are pushing.»

There is no logical requirement for the first answer to lead to «mostly because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels.»

But the sad fact is that the answer to the troll's question is contained in the article itself, yet still she demands the adoption of magic as being logical.

So one possible answer of the system is to increase it's internal energy (temperature) and to radiate less what is very logical because Rr being constant, a bit more of it will be consumed to populate the new high energy states so less energy will be available for Re.

Many don't get this — but it goes for both the temperature targets of ≤ 2 degrees (UN, G8, G21) and ≤ 1.5 degrees (wiser people) and the internationally accepted maximum GHG concentration level of 450 ppm — and for the CO2 stabilisation concentration level of 350 ppm (Hansen and many other climate scientists): if we know «2» is the right answer, we're not that clever when we fail to comprehend 1 +1 is the logical route to getting there.]

To be sure, I'm eventually capable of providing a logical and orderly explanation of my thinking, but it's a fiction that describes the shortest path between question and answer, rather than describing the random walk I had been on.

The applied mathematicians there say «The question of what is applied mathematics does not answer to logical classification so much as to the sociology of professionals who use mathematics.»