Sentences with phrase «logical as their argument»

As logical as that argument seems based on cash alone, the same logic would dictate that you buy a Ford Fiesta rather than a Harley Davidson motorcycle.

Not exact matches

Nonetheless, there is a logical argument that some of these existing rules may indeed be viewed as unfair.

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

I find it funny that the Christian position, when met with any logical argument to discount the greatness of the Bible, can only cite more passages from the same book, as opposed to countering with a equally logical counter position.

This community has as its core a mystery to the human experience, and a sense that story and imagery can persuade at least as well as logical, more strictly factual arguments.

Oh and if you want to have interesting debates in the future with people and not get labelled as a troll then learn how to form logical arguments.

Jamie, your «fact» and entire argument is nothing but a logical fallacy known as an «argumentum ad ignorantiam».

Job seekers should be able to offer some sort of proof of their personal integrity as well as logical arguments that prove the soundness of their ideas.

«We may hold that the existence of God can not be directly established by any logical argument, dialectical or otherwise; but we can insist that some objective principle of order and value is immanent in rational thought in particular, and in the cosmos as a whole.»

Using concepts that you CLEARLY don't understand in your arguments is about as logical as your conclusions.

First he attempted to apply a logical argument, whose history extends back at least as far as Cicero's On Divination.4 According to this view, contingency (chance) and foreknowledge (fate) are contradictory assertions because a contingent event, being unnecessitated, can not be known until it occurs.

He's developing an argument about the significance of the doctrine of the resurrection by discussing the logical consequence of denying it (verses 12 - 19), going on a very typical Pauline digression almost as if he's overcome by joy at the positive truth and has to triumphantly proclaim it (verses 20 - 28) then finally returning to drive home the practical point again (verses 29 - 35).

What is with the Christian backers of their god as soon as they are backed into a corner and they do not have a logical answer they come back well after the fact and start the same BS arguments all over again.

Besides, the Kalam argument breaks down the moment it demands special pleading for a creator being, therefore it can never be characterized as a «logical» argument proving anything.

The persuasive way to read Pascal's original is as a performance argument and a prayer, but, taken as a flat set of logical possibilities, it has an answer in the extremely unlikely possibility that God rewards disbelief or that God punishes belief.

It was not meant as logical argument.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

In Der Gedanke, Frege maintains that thoughts (i.e., propositions, judgments) are grasped as unanalyzed wholes, and only later analyzed — not into subject and predicate — but into argument and function, whose logical unity is prior to their component parts (FBB 29; LU 30 - 53).

Janey, look up the logical fallacy known as «negative proof», then you will understand how silly, your argument is.

It would not be difficult to show that these arguments contain hidden assumptions and logical lapses which invalidate them as demonstrative proofs.

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

The abstract aspect of God is his absolute, eternal, and necessary existence; and, as such, this aspect can be known by abstract metaphysical argument and logical proof.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

I mean you can make an argument, as of course, [was done in] The Case for Faith... that there is a logical argument for the truth of Christianity.

There's no «reasoning» in discussion; just «I believe this» or «I believe that» as though somehow that's a sound logical argument in and of itself.

I don't think your argument is as logical as you think it is.

Suffice for now is to say this: it is my opinion that 1) Scripture is clear that God's wrath and holiness demanded a sin payment, 2) as I read your articles you seem to be trying to use every logical, illustrative, and theological trick to convince yourself it's not true, but it's like you're losing the argument with yourself, 3) I really enjoyed that you broadened the truth of salvation through Jesus past justification (which many fundamentals focus on) to include redemption, sanctification, covenant marriage, adoption, etc..

He described the change of paradigms during a «scientific revolution» as a matter not of logical argument but of persuasion and «conversion».

It is no longer philistine to lay the rude hands of logical analysis upon them — and they need not come out the worse for so doing, as Peirce noted so well in his paper «Neglected Argument» years back!

At Erfurt the Occamists gave Martin a confidence in logical processes and the use of argument and dialectic which never left him, however much he thundered against it as a way to religious faith.

As someone who believes in God but requires logical arguments, I'm going to need you to inject more reason into your faith.

Topher, I and many others have presented very clear and logical arguments as to why religion is most likely 100 % bullshit.

Thank you, good to see some people can think for themselves I will put your thumbs down to hitting a nreve on the so called fans, you said something which is true and they didn't like it... so they HAD to do something, even if it is as simple as disliking as they can't put forward a logical argument.

If you now consequently wish to take, as you previously have, my stance as proof that you are right and that Arsenal are indeed especially persecuted by the media, then you are merely indulging in the logical fallacy, ad ignorantiam — aka argument from ignorance.

But predicting the future as being more bleak than I can see any logical argument for just gives me more enthusiasm to see him stick out another year, finish 3rd (maybe win a cup, or do well in the Champions League!)

It's as logical and just an argument as «if she hadn't been dressed that way she wouldn't have been raped.»

This argument sounds logical and it's obviously good and fine to have your partner at your labor and birth, however, before you slash the idea of a doula off your list forever, know that a partner, even an excellent partner, is not the same as a doula.

This argument sounds logical and it's obviously good and fine to have your partner at your labor and birth, however, before you slash the idea of a doula forever, know that a partner — even an excellent partner — is not the same as a doula.

If you take the argument against selection to its logical conclusion then once an MP has been elected to Parliament they should stay in the job as long as they want and there is no further need for any General Election.

It takes logical arguments based on legal principles outlined in the statute, the regulations, and the government's tome on patent law practice to really succeed as a technical specialist or patent agent.

Hi John, thank you for your response, although it was rife with logical fallacy and probably insincere (if you're not a proponent of juice fasting or any other nutritional program, why'd you take the time to write a long response to me, in which you're clearly disturbed by my argument and use the same typical arguments as holistic / homeopathic medicine practitioners around the globe?)

«I want them to think through what they read online, to apply all the skills they learned in the class — evaluating source credibility, identifying logical fallacies, recognizing bias, basing written arguments on solid evidence — to social media platforms just as much as they do in their academic work.»

And he seemed to have a logical argument for his position as Joe often does.

Read on for the survey responses as well as my argument about what I think a logical next step is to make these results valuable.

Also, My Thesis Writing Service thinks that in order to do better on a philosophy thesis you should make strong and logical arguments, couple them with demonstrated knowledge, reference and discuss the philosophical concepts as well as thoroughly proofread the finished work after you are done writing it and you will do great.

As a rule, teachers, and professors evaluate such works based on each students» writing and critical thinking skills, combined with the ability to draw logical conclusions and support personal viewpoint with strong arguments and facts.

As an analytical essay writer, you have to investigate the issue, emphasize «how» rather than «what», focus on the topic rather than on your point of view, discuss different aspects of analytical essay topic, and make your arguments clear and logical.

By conducting some research to find effective resources to use as your source material, organize the arguments in a logical manner, and structure the paper to complete the argument presented, students can create a persuasive dissertation.

As I pointed out in the review, the problem with SM is not logical (though I don't see how earning 0 % on the investments bought with borrowed money is coming out ahead, but for argument sake let us suppose that an investor is earning 7 % -8 % from a diversified portfolio) but psychological.

It could very well be argued that being able to join all these different guilds as just odd, but I have a logical, well thought out argument to that: shut up, minion.