Sentences with phrase «logical conclusion here»

Not exact matches

But here's the germane point: To reject human exceptionalism is essentially to claim that we are just another animal in the forest, which leads to the logical conclusion that killing should be an allowable remedy to illness and disability.

Some of his work is quoted by others in papers and articles I read so I know there are others greatly concerned abut what he is doing here, not just antagonists like Troubleunderfoot, who by the way, is asking Jeremy to really consider the logical conclusions of what he is trying to teach.

It would be the logical conclusion for the guys on here who throw around the «4th placed junkie» jibes, advocating «spend, spend, spend» and being frustrated at the boards «lack of ambition» (where in their minds only spending = ambition).

I an just making a hypothesis here and reading between the lines, but I reckon that it is pretty logical conclusion to make about Arsenal and one of the best players in the world at the minute.

I've written a lot about the potential for nutrient deficiencies on a vegetarian diet, and so I'm not going to rehash that here, but if you take an acid - alkaline diet through to its logical conclusion, you'll end up on a vegetarian or even vegan diet.

The idyll soon collapses, however, thanks to an unfortunate threesome, and from here pretty much anything is swept through the floodgates: stoner gags, muddy white underpants, drunken teen - agers, armed holdups, a slew of penile - measuring jokes, a prison term, a near - drowning, and a vivid demonstration of what Casper calls «man - flirting,» complete with its logical conclusion.

Space limits an extended discussion here, but we note two conclusions from a 2012 article by Economic Policy Institute researcher Monique Morrissey, who explains that «the logical implication of Richwine and Biggs's [pension] position is that public employers and taxpayers would be indifferent between current pension funding practices and investing in Treasury securities, even though this would triple the cost of pension benefits» and that R & B «selectively alternate between the cost of benefits to employers and the value to workers, and inappropriately equate the latter with the often much higher cost to individuals of obtaining equivalent benefits.»

I'm decidedly a believer in anthropogenic climate change, because even my meager experience of first and second year Physics, as a student of Chemistry and Physics, leads me to that logical conclusion after having read a bit about the subject from experts, like here at RC.

However, the most glaring logical fallacy here involves the conclusion that climate change does not pose a threat because we can adapt to it.

Obviously, there is a logical contradiction here, if both conclusions, «global warming» and «pause» over the recent 20 years were equally valid, based on the same logic of reasoning and using the same data, only switching the Null - hypothesis with the alternative hypothesis, since the two conclusions are mutually exclusive.