Sentences with phrase «logical conclusions without»

Structure should be correct including three major parts, subparts, transitional words and sentences, thesis placed in introduction, logical conclusions without summarizing, etc..

In general, it is almost never fruitful to try to apply legal principles of any kind to their logical conclusion without grounding that logic in fact specific and context specific precedents and applications.

Not exact matches

(See How to Deal with Time Wasters) Such sessions rarely accomplish anything except maybe some pseudo-bonding; they don't have a logical and clearly - understood endpoint so they seem both pointless and interminable; and, most often, they sorta drool to a conclusion without agreed - upon action items and / or documented next steps for at least half the people in the room.

Once you get that through your thick skulls and hardened hearts, you come to the logical conclusion that without the Savior - you will be condemned.

I suspect this is why this new breed of rigid Calvinism that follows the «five points» to their most logical conclusion, without regard to the moral implications of them, has flourished in the past twenty years.

But mere familiarity is not enough, for it does not answer the fundamental question: if the causal relation is identified with the relation of logical implication in which the premises imply the conclusion, is it possible to obtain any temporal sequence at all without surreptitiously borrowing it from experience?

Live4Him Boy, do you ever draw a lot of direct conclusions without any logical basis for doing so.

In many passages it is obvious that the idea of God inherent in Jesus» thought has not yet found its logical conclusion; that what Jesus himself, thinking in terms of some of his own parables and of his own life - principles, could not have considered ethically satisfying endless, hopeless torture, without constructive moral purpose and therefore without moral meaning — God is accused of inflicting, as judge of the world and arbiter of destiny.

On the other hand, worship — without — neighbor — love deletes the logical conclusion of loving God.

I will never consider it rude to state what the logical conclusion should be according to your attempted deduction, to demand a similarly logical deduction in support of any and all seriously made claims by others, to call out the bullshit when someone fails to do so, or to respond to people behaving like idiots, making idiotic statements or trying to argue without sufficient intellectual abilities, by calling them what they are: idiots.

I am someone that tends to think in a pretty analytical and logical way and thus I can not come to firm conclusions or firm opinions without a decent amount of tangible evidence to stand on.

Without even quite basic information about what took place, we were left to follow logical conclusions - that a former Russian agent of the type Vladimir Putin is on record saying he'd like to get was attacked using a method previously adopted in Russian operations.

Taking Success's argument «to its logical conclusion,» Ms. Elia wrote, «would mean that D.O.E. would be required to provide charter schools» prekindergarten programs with public funding without any mechanism to ensure» that they were meeting quality requirements, and that «public funds are being spent in accordance with the requirements.»

This important conclusion, albeit from tightly logical experiments in mice, must remain tentative until HNK is shown to be effective in patients with depression without the dissociative effects of ketamine.

I def see someone who lacks clear logical thinking and jumps on a conclusion without even fully understanding what he is saying... Guessing you just take things at face value and never delve deeper into the actual causes / effects of things.

If you want to enjoy the story of a game without wasting time on its combat, or make a cute house in Animal Crossing without grinding for tons of bells, or see what happens at the end of Nuclear Throne without playing again and again, then cheating is the logical conclusion — why bother engaging with those systems?

This process is repeated until the overall visual problem reaches a logical conclusion where no one element can be removed without fundamentally altering the whole painting.

It seems like I can't argue for it in good faith without using a fallacy or two, yet I can't be expected to become an expert such that I could reasonably draw my own logical conclusions.

What is lacking is «easy» solution which would allow the use of the precautionary principle (without easy solution, precautionary principle is a terrible trap), so imho the logical conclusion is no - regret policies and further study — certainly not guilt - relieving policies and economic redistribution, which seems to be the current approach...