Sentences with phrase «logical error»

As others seem to consider it important to discuss the past, it's best to do that correctly — meaning being consistent and trying to avoid logical errors at the minimum.

The most amusing logical error may the use of the software industry's vigorous defense of intellectual property as justification for the «special protection» this group seeks for authors and books.

This is an example of a more general logical error that mixes up correlation and causation.

Their comments, which bring context and insights from the latest research, and point out factual and logical errors where they exist, remain layered over the target article in the public domain.

The most serious logical error in the book is his avalanche of local temperatures to refute a theory that posits a global mean.

The notion that Christianity is somehow untenable because its followers and institutions aren't perfect, or because its principles can be complex and difficult to apply in the real world, is a classic instance of the elementary logical error of mistaking a part for the whole.

If such a cosmic battle is not an ongoing reality, then Santorum (and any similarly believing Christian) would be making a serious logical error.

That Heritage Foundation broadside accuses the Congressional Budget Office of making elementary logical errors, but if you actually read the office's report, it's clear that the foundation is willfully misreading it.

Your are making two fundamental logical errors, while also showing that you know nothing about the nature of serving in the military

So me won't get onto you for logical errors me would others that don't agree with Ironicus.

Women who follow Somers» advice make a grave logical error — they assume that lack of evidence that a product is harmful can be taken as proof of its safety.

The danger of committing this sort of logical error when contemplating a list of stocks such as the Dividend Champions is quite acute.

she made an enormous number of simple logical errors.

Another common logical error is post hoc, ergo propter hoc, meaning «after this, therefore because of this.»

It's possible you are making a making logical error — could it be that most SF / Fantasy authors are choosing to self - publish rather than sign with major publishers, and they're the ones gobbling up that vanishing market share?

And if you also posit that «Everything must have a creator, therefore God exists», you have committed a serious logical error.

But this attack indulges in a logical error called the genetic fallacy — the mistaken idea that information from a compromised source is necessarily false.

Being contradicted by a science isn't a logical error.

It's a logical error so famous it has a name.

Father Oakes seems to have committed a logical error, occasioned by his use of Cardinal Newman's aphorism, «I believe in design because I believe in God, not in a God because I see design.»

You obviously haven't thought this through because the logical errors in your reasoning are comical in their retardedness... maybe that means you aren't part of god's plan!!!

You commited the logical error, not Colin.

This is a logical error.

Although I will note that, «I did it without incident, therefore it is safe» is a logical error, but that's not quite what you did here.

The usual caveat for those of you here for the first time: There will be typos and possibly a range of grammatical and logical errors.