Sentences with phrase «logical explanation as to»

I am sure I saw those exact words in an e-mail to me (also known as: the royal highness), because there is no logical explanation as to why I got treated like royalty...

The only logical explanation as to why more people aren't talking about Damián Szifron's Wild Tales this year is that they didn't realize it counts as a 2015 release (in the U.S.) after generating so much buzz last year from its Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Language film.

I am having a hair pulling time trying to get a logical explanation as to why I need to eat a bunch of fat on a Keto diet (for an obese person) I have made up my own diet based on hundreds of hours research and combining several diets all into one.

Not exact matches

Though Jobs's explanation was logical enough — with iTunes sales set to outpace those of CDs, he said it was time to drop the compact disc from the logo — observers were less than understanding, loudly deriding the blue bubble and black note as everything from «nondescript» to «hideous.»

I'm 43 yrs old and have spent 1/2 my life as a non-believer and can tell you that there is NO logical explanation to religion.

Seems reasonable and logical and scientifically explanable as the explanation for what occurred as the Bible shows forth the works of a Mighty God whose power to create all that there is — is all that is needed to hold it all together until such time as He determines to change things up!

Next you'll be pointing to Science as an explanation for the creation of the Universe; which all intelligent educated people realize is a logical fallacy.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).

As I hate to assume malice when ignorance is enough of an explanation, I give you a chance: just point me to any logical error in any of the major religions.

If Christians use logical or natural explanations to explain the rise of other traditions, such as the foundation of Mormonism on the visions of Joseph Smith, these explanations must be applied to the Judeo - Christian tradition as well.

Many processes which we now regard as quite natural and logical were mysteries to medieval man and consequently offered a ready seedbed for all kinds of explanations which depended upon intervention by some supernatural force.

As far as human beings are concerned, evolution does not have to be the only logical explanation as it should not be beyond the capacity of God to design and create them without evolutioAs far as human beings are concerned, evolution does not have to be the only logical explanation as it should not be beyond the capacity of God to design and create them without evolutioas human beings are concerned, evolution does not have to be the only logical explanation as it should not be beyond the capacity of God to design and create them without evolutioas it should not be beyond the capacity of God to design and create them without evolution.

If, instead, we use the notion of LSD as an amplifier of mental processes, which in turn results in intensification of feeling due to the development of contrast, we can provide an explanation of peak experience as a logical extension of the lower level phenomena.

If our models are to lead us to ask, and seek answers for, new questions about the world, we must regard them as something more than «logical superfluities», «illicit attempts at explanation», «convenient fictions», or the like.

Oh forget it, when someone is a fanatic and sees any logical explanation as dim witted or idiotic there is not much to say.

As the tension turns deadly, logical explanations begin to dwindle as it appears there is a malevolent force along for the ride, and these sinners are meant to pay for past transgressionAs the tension turns deadly, logical explanations begin to dwindle as it appears there is a malevolent force along for the ride, and these sinners are meant to pay for past transgressionas it appears there is a malevolent force along for the ride, and these sinners are meant to pay for past transgressions.

To go for 3D is perhaps the only logical explanation for pushing such higher resolutions and DPI as in reality the resolution gets halved, one for each eye to successfully create the 3D effecTo go for 3D is perhaps the only logical explanation for pushing such higher resolutions and DPI as in reality the resolution gets halved, one for each eye to successfully create the 3D effecto successfully create the 3D effect.

The logical explanation is that I had enough risk in my portfolio, and as for the low - risk portion of my money, it made no sense to borrow at 3.0 % after taxes and invest it at 2.2 % in, say, Treasuries.

So you have to lead them through a scientific, logical, factual chain of explanation and causation as to why that matters.

Your statement has no logical basis to it at all; Not «believing» in an imaginary deity as a logical explanation of the existence of all things, makes one a narcissist?

The «stadium wave» as a partial systemic or meta explanation of the natural evoultion of climate affecting factors is an intersting, cogent and logical step to understanding this sort of thing — it might mot be right, but at least it's an attempt, even if it will take years or decades to determine if it's on the right track and what other factors need to be added / removed to make it an effective and usefully predictive tool.

In any event, though you might hear what sound like mathematical arguments occasionally from the Intelligent Design crowd, the very crux of the disagreement really comes down to what conceptually counts as an explanation in a logical way.

Well, I don't know if it is so and if it holds quantitatively but this, may be naïve, explanation seems to be logical to me, at least as long as somebody comes with a better explanation.

«There is no logical explanation she can provide as to why she is now wasting the Court's time, as well as the staff's time, with these improper redactions.»