Sentences with phrase «logical explanation of»

That is the one I do not see and I would like an explicit and logical explanation of it.

Your statement has no logical basis to it at all; Not «believing» in an imaginary deity as a logical explanation of the existence of all things, makes one a narcissist?

«So when I look for pension money advice there doesn't seem to be any logical explanation of the pension / cash / stock / bond balance.

All present the theory of evolution as a logical explanation of the known facts in biological history.

She must had concluded the only logical explanation of the snake sudden speech is the eaten of the fruit.

Given the premises, it is a perfectly logical explanation of the presence of evil in the world.

This workshop will provide caregivers with logical explanations of attachment theory, attachment patterns, children behavior, stages of grief and loss and how it affects attachment, and interventions.

Not exact matches

Though Jobs's explanation was logical enough — with iTunes sales set to outpace those of CDs, he said it was time to drop the compact disc from the logo — observers were less than understanding, loudly deriding the blue bubble and black note as everything from «nondescript» to «hideous.»

That's also the only logical explanation for how Enron CEO Jeff Skilling and Adelphia chief John Rigas defrauded shareholders out of billions and cost thousands of employees their jobs and pensions.

The single most logical explanation for the rapid run - up in the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the past year is, quite simply, the Trump promise of a massive corporate tax cut enacted by Congress.

And there's no good explanation I can think of for why this change makes any logical sense.

Seems reasonable and logical and scientifically explanable as the explanation for what occurred as the Bible shows forth the works of a Mighty God whose power to create all that there is — is all that is needed to hold it all together until such time as He determines to change things up!

Next you'll be pointing to Science as an explanation for the creation of the Universe; which all intelligent educated people realize is a logical fallacy.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of science» or «evolution moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

there are logical explanations for everything that happens in this world - none of it requires a god or magic.

I have offered countless well - reasoned, logical explanations here explaining a wide range of behaviors and phenoma, none of which you've been able to refute.

Thus, by describing the antecedent field we can provide a reasonable basis for logical analysis, but we also demonstrate the need for a narrative explanation of the creative process through which the Indeterminate conditions of the antecedent world are transformed into constituent elements of some novel occasion.

But the purpose of the hierarchy is precisely to formalize the process of abstraction used by historians, so that they can avoid the logical inconsistencies that often corrupt their narrative explanations and meet the criticism that has been (I think justly) leveled at them.

By sorting out the primary contrasts at their appropriate levels of abstraction, we provide a critical approach to both the criticism of narrative explanation and the construction of logical arguments.

This is a much neater and more logical system of explanation of origin, destiny, and differences of character than are either immortality or resurrection.

But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).

I'm challenging you, in the spirit of necessary opposition, to provide a logical explanation for the delays?

The fact is no one has conceived of a logical explanation yet.

The God hypothesis is the most plausible and extremely LOGICAL explanation for this existence; there is no other explanation for the «Origin» of the universe and life in it.

As I hate to assume malice when ignorance is enough of an explanation, I give you a chance: just point me to any logical error in any of the major religions.

If we use Occam's razor, which states that one should use the simplest logical explanation for any phenomenon, we would eliminate the super universe / multi-universe explanation in favor of the simpler God - designed universe model.

The most logical and scientific explanation of how something was created from nothing is that there's another dimension that controls the dimension containing physical matter.

Likewise, there are logical steps that can lead one to conclude that Christianity is the MOST LIKELY explanation in a logical sense, and THEN take the step of faith into belief.

The problem confronted by such a poem is not that of understanding, of explanation or of establishing the rational relation among the logical subjects — wheelbarrow, rainwater, and white chickens.

Israel did not evolve some logical formulation which might be considered a complete explanation of suffering.

If Christians use logical or natural explanations to explain the rise of other traditions, such as the foundation of Mormonism on the visions of Joseph Smith, these explanations must be applied to the Judeo - Christian tradition as well.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of God,» «God is outside the Universe» or «God moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

Since the goal of this paper is to describe a mechanistic model of explanation, the connection between these logical notions and Turing machines will allow us to establish the relationship between the explanatory model and the image of the machine.

That is, it seems to me that while the standard free - will explanation for natural evil does allow the FWT to maintain logical consistency, it is not an explanation that flows in some obvious, natural sense from the basic tenets of free - will theism.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of god» or «god moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

There can be a number of explanations of what the Psalmist meant by «Your Word», but there is NO logical, historical, exegetical, literary or otherwise reasonable basis for thinking he meant the modern Bible.

Of these two forms of explanation, it is the second which Plato considers to be the subject matter of dialectic, i.e., logical analysis, and moves therefrom to the theory of FormOf these two forms of explanation, it is the second which Plato considers to be the subject matter of dialectic, i.e., logical analysis, and moves therefrom to the theory of Formof explanation, it is the second which Plato considers to be the subject matter of dialectic, i.e., logical analysis, and moves therefrom to the theory of Formof dialectic, i.e., logical analysis, and moves therefrom to the theory of Formof Forms.

Many processes which we now regard as quite natural and logical were mysteries to medieval man and consequently offered a ready seedbed for all kinds of explanations which depended upon intervention by some supernatural force.

As far as human beings are concerned, evolution does not have to be the only logical explanation as it should not be beyond the capacity of God to design and create them without evolution.

If, instead, we use the notion of LSD as an amplifier of mental processes, which in turn results in intensification of feeling due to the development of contrast, we can provide an explanation of peak experience as a logical extension of the lower level phenomena.

Most of our players are not as bad as we think, they just lack proper coaching and motivation, plus they are being played out of position and some being benched for no logical explanation.

The overwhelmingly logical explanation, IMO, is that Clemson's offense was much more pass - heavy than Notre Dame's and when Clemson did run the ball it almost always was with some type of QB option (both traditional & RPO) that threatened the edge of the BC defense with speedy, quick and elusive runners — the type of runners that BC would want Landry to be in the game to try to out - quick and run down.

Sanchez has lost his MOJO no question, same happened to OZIL at some point, the similar patter has a logical explanation, both came from Clubs with a philosophy of WIN IT ALL they both realized they came to the wrong team with a very wrong Manager

This is a sort of punishment concept for toddler with logical explanation for him to understand his act.

And maybe some explanation of the logical gap between the «respect the diversity» and «official status» of the language.

«The mitochondrial - impairment hypothesis provides a pretty logical and parsimonious explanation for why ApoE4 does bad things,» says Mucke, «not only in the context of Alzheimer's, but maybe also in other diseases.»

Now, research from the University of Wisconsin - Madison, published last week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, corroborates many of these explanations, but finds no evidence for other logical suggestions, such as that deceitful pollination.

The presence of dead bowel furnished a logical explanation for Grace's sepsis and also explained why all the vigorous measures being applied were not resulting in any improvement in her acidosis.

Now a study by MIT linguistics professors and a team from Carleton University, based on an experiment with children between the ages of 3 and 6, proposes a new explanation, with a twist: In examining this apparent flaw, the researchers conclude that children deploy a more sophisticated mode of logical analysis than many experts have previously realized.