Exploring the myths, misperceptions, and
logical fallacies upon which such arguments are based, Welcome Home provides an alternative animal rights agenda for companion dogs and cats, one which considers the historical antecedents of those relationships, replaces despair for humanity with optimism, and prescribes concrete action that can be taken today to improve the lives and well - being of these animals.
Not exact matches
Saying (or even implying) that Jesus» silence in the Synoptics is tantamount to an absence of clear teaching is to engage in the
logical fallacy of «reasoning from silence,» which is built
upon shaky rationality.
In fact, the distinction rests
upon a highly questionable concatenation of social theories, political postures,
logical fallacies, and psychological assumptions, and a comprehensive rejection of historical social practices.
Of course, the issue about agw / cc and informing the polity better is not bound by a misinterpretation of what one guy in one video said by relying
upon the
logical fallacy (ie gross error) in cherrypicking a transcript from 12:40 versus grasping the holistic messaging that begins at 0.00 and in particular from 11m38s beginning with the HUGE GRAPHIC emphasizing 6C @ https://youtu.be/A7ktYbVwr90?t=11m39s ongoing about FEEDBACKS and their UNKNOWN QUALITY which leads into «the great danger of» comment which without drawing BREATH leads in the sentence «These positive feedback systems will take on a momentum of their own that becomes unstoppable.
This article is an absolutely perfect example of the
logical fallacy of argumentum ad hominem, the deliberate focus
upon the persons of those articulating points of contention in order to duplicitously evade addressing the substance of the points these persons are making.