Sentences with phrase «logical fallacy of»

Isn't this the logical fallacy of circular reasoning again?

This is a deliberate use of the logical fallacy of equivocation to create a misleading impression.

To me, 3 appears to be the Logical Fallacy of Appealing to Ignorance.

WebHubTelescope The issue is not «hurt feelings», but the logical fallacy of argument by rhetorical appeal to issues other than objective scientific facts relative to stated hypotheses, and theories.

That is well and good although I do suggest you read the logical fallacy of «appeal to authority» in Curry et al. 2006.

David indulges here — as many do — in the informal logical fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantum.

The logical fallacy of «moving the goalpoast» is only given, if the one who is allegedly doing that had before defined a normative criterion about something, which then is changed, when it is fulfilled.

This is the classic logical fallacy of non sequitur — Latin for «it does not follow».

Your lack of logical ability is demonstrated by your use of the logical fallacy of «Argument from Authority» which you again present here concerning «the viewpoint of the IPCC» (despite my having told you of that fallacy).

But my point was the logical fallacy of arguing that a high proportion of CO2 being man - made proved that man is responsible for global warming.

This myth commits the logical fallacy of jumping to conclusions.

Both your argument and mine are based on the logical fallacy of argument to authority.

The logical fallacy of «the appeal to authority» is widely misunderstood.

This article is an absolutely perfect example of the logical fallacy of argumentum ad hominem, the deliberate focus upon the persons of those articulating points of contention in order to duplicitously evade addressing the substance of the points these persons are making.

This is similar to the well - known logical fallacy of «no true Scotsman» that redefines the credentials of someone based on his views or actions.

To proceed from the point of a lack of proof that changing the atmosphere is harmful to a lack of proof of harm being a proof of no harm is not the null hypothesis at all — but the informal logical fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantum.

You have no evidence that claims of conversion are false, but you make a strong claim («It is quite a common tactic») based on the logical fallacy of an appeal to ignorance.

The no proof of harm is proof of no harm argument is the logical fallacy of argumentum in ignorantum.

Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument.

you were responding to a clear joke: the use of reductio ad hitlerum which was pointing out your logical fallacy of an extremely similar nature.

I write to challenge the logical fallacy of the «straw man» middle school these articles depict and the negative effects associated with it.

Also, beware of the logical fallacy of «it exists, therefore it is the best», as this answer seems to engage in.

Religions fall into idolatry, which is parallel to the logical fallacy of misplaced concreteness.

If you say he does not need a creator, then you are committing the logical fallacy of special pleading.

So, yes... I «can» argue with it / you... and anyone else who is unfortunately, as quite often the case committing the logical fallacy of «circular reasoning» with a pinch of «begging the question.»

Then, to argue that proof of the Big Bang theory is evidence for a god that created everything utilizes the logical fallacy of an «Appeal to Ambiguity.»

The bad reasoning behind this thesis, which combines guilt by association with the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc (the ecumenical movement became «liberal» because it was concerned for church union and social demonstration of the gospel), is part of the theological DDT in evangelical soil which inhibits the growth and maturing of the present awakening.

Bernardo, I just think you are continuing to be silly in professing to have wisdom to impart and continuing down this path of rhetoric about a «myth» and logical fallacy of argument from authority.

Are you aware that you are using the logical fallacy of an appeal to ancient wisdom?

Saying (or even implying) that Jesus» silence in the Synoptics is tantamount to an absence of clear teaching is to engage in the logical fallacy of «reasoning from silence,» which is built upon shaky rationality.

It is this false claim made by so many, particularly in more fundamental religious communities, that is being challenged by this simple illustration of the logical fallacy of such a view.

I'd be fine if the cartoon was lampooning an actual conservative belief or pointing out a real logical fallacy of conservative thought; but this doesn't seem to be doing that.

< > Assuming Jesus actually said that and it wasn't added by the early Catholics at the Council of Nicene < > This is the logical fallacy of the False Dilemma, avoiding a number of other possibilities.

This is the logical fallacy of the False Dilemma, avoiding a number of other possibilities.

You mean so she can continue to be confused by all the contradictions and logical fallacies of this supposedly «divinely inspired» book written by people with no concept of simple things like the chlorophyll in plants that make them green?

This is a consultation which takes all the disparate hypocrisies and logical fallacies of the government's porn policy and puts them together into one perfect package.

We argue the logical fallacies of the Carbon Dioxide Cult, what I perceive as, abuse of the scientific method.We are interested in negating their attempts to cloak a cause in science as a cover for power over people.

«The Bias and Logical Fallacies of Christopher Booker's «Freezing Heat»,» EcoWorldy, November 17, 2008.

Hence the necessity of exposing the fatal weaknesses and logical fallacies of LNT... and begging the Moderators» forgiveness... even at the risk of tedious circularity and repetition.

Not exact matches

There is another logical fallacy that has largely been ignored by proponents of legalizing marijuana.

The «Argumentum ad Rogerum» is a logical fallacy used frequently by Bitcoin Core zealots, charlatans & socks to shift the discussion of BCH / BTC from philosophy, economics and technology to the character of Roger Ver.https: / / t.co / 37KdArSs9f

Try googling «logical fallacies» and see why I laugh at most of your posts.

Other than that, congratulations, that was the finest example of the logical fallacy known as an «Argument from Ignorance» that I have seen in a long time.

First of all, it's a logical fallacy — the argument from popularity.

Next you'll be pointing to Science as an explanation for the creation of the Universe; which all intelligent educated people realize is a logical fallacy.

@ David By definition, Michael isn't actually a troll, since all of his arguments are logic - based arguments and pretty reasonable considering his standpoint, unlike the gross logical fallacies put forth by Cecilia Davidson (ULTIMATE ABILITY: you're wrong about everything because you're a bigot.

I have never found a single one of his arguments that wasn't either a logical fallacy or an obvious misuse of math.

The historian must sort out the major contrasts, identify levels of relative abstraction, and take note of configurations that remain potential in order to avoid the logical fallacies and stylistic shortcuts noted in the first part of this paper.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for «after this, therefore because of this,» is a logical fallacy... Post hoc is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence appears to be integral to causality.

Therefore, I think we should laugh and enjoy the logical fallacies that make these cartoons so very interesting... and often the start of a great conversation and exchange of viewpoints.