Sentences with phrase «logical people do»

What rational, logical people do is take all the information and try to make sense of it.

Not exact matches

(See How to Deal with Time Wasters) Such sessions rarely accomplish anything except maybe some pseudo-bonding; they don't have a logical and clearly - understood endpoint so they seem both pointless and interminable; and, most often, they sorta drool to a conclusion without agreed - upon action items and / or documented next steps for at least half the people in the room.

«We knew we wanted to focus on the process of getting ready for a race weekend, which is a logical storytelling structure for people who follow the sport and for those who don't.

«Betty could do more logical reasoning while she was asleep than most people can do awake,» Jennings later marveled.

The logical conclusion people reach as a result is that people go away from home often, and when doing so, they need places to stay.

Throughout history, experts have observed that people are far from logical when investing their own money, said Amos Nadler, assistant finance professor with the Ivey Business School at Western University in Toronto, adding behavioural research he's doing today confirms nothing has really changed.

«When people use physical activity as a body sculpting tool, the logical thing to do is to exercise hard, because you want to burn as many calories as possible,» motivation expert Michelle Seger told HuffPost.

People refer for logical reasons (because they have determined that your company offers good deals or great products) and for emotional reasons (because they enjoy doing business with you).

The answer to the puzzle of why people don't do what is logical and beneficial for the individual and the team, lies deeper than you might think.

That doesn't make you a bad person to come to that logical conclusion and doesn't mean that some higher power is going to gleefully roast you for all eternity for it.

i do know dave that you are making attempts at a logical debate but don't throw the name - calling technique in the fray as well, usually to people it is the most memorable thing in a statement, and the next post will likely be insulting as well.

Any logical thinking person understands this, but I do not believe logic and intelligence always co-exist anymore.

You can do alot of detective work to find that the boyfriend pretty much couldn't exist but if the person deeply believes then logical proof most likely won't work.

Case in point, it is not logical to suggest there is «good» vs «bad» if there is no ultimate moral authority, no higher power that created everything, including free will and the ability to choose whether to heed that drive to do what is «good» vs doing what you want to do at the expense of «good» and of other people.

But the logical atheist would think... billions of people experience something that I don't experience, sure they call it by different names, but they still are experiencing something.

This would mean, by logical standards, that the people who did move to the Western Hemisphere would have had to have abandoned their culture, their tools, and even their god, for there is no record of monotheism in the Western Hemisphere.

A lot of people who believe in the individual election to eternal life view say they do not believe in double predestination because of how repulsive it is, but to me, it seems the logical conclusion.

That just doesn't seem logical; but, then, a fundamental error of the Enlightenment is believing that, given the necessary knowledge, people will always behave logically.

So, while they may say that questioning strengthens faith, they truly don't mean it... because logical contemplation on the subject matter can lead reasonable people to the conclusion that there is no God... or at the very least that their «chosen» God is not real.

Its called fuzzy logic, the idea that since people are rational but almost always don't have all the necessary information to make a perfectly logical conclusion, the resulting truths are always assailable.

Neville you are right in that sense that the holy spirit or anti christ is not mentioned however the whole book is about the return of Jesus and the rise of the anti christ so it is logical to believe that the one being restrained is the man of sin or anti christ.I believe it is the anti christ and the restrainer is the holy spirit that is working through believers.It comes down to personal belief but This article covers all the options http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/revelation/related-topics/who-is-the-restrainer.html What do you believe about preaching the Gospel to all nations and then the Lord will return at this point in time i believe there is around 2000 unreached people groups.brentnz

A logical person??? Why do you know any?

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

Wait a minute... Educated, smart, intelligent, logical, rational people DO NT believe in God and uneducated, naive, irrational, dummies DO believe in God?

Even when an argument is won on pure logical grounds others are not necessarily going to be convinced, for logic does not equal plausibility and because pure logic always has its own inherent bias that makes people suspicious.

Whether to follow his example or not is a personal choice everyone gets to make, but at least make an informed choice, knowing who Jesus actually was, and what he actually did and is doing, and not assuming the the over 44,000 Christian denominations are all telling the truth — not even logical since they are all saying different things, and the Bible says God's people would be united.

The logical necessity of mathematics rests upon the basic «laws of thought,» which define not how people actually do think, but how they ought to think, if the goal of universal understanding and agreement is to be achieved.

Yet, this logical and reasonable guy smoked cigarettes and drank heavily, which is one of the most illogical and unreasonable thing a person can do.

4 known, 7 in the unseen realm — you know, the one that «logical people» say does not exist.

Unfortunately, people like ISIS have taken this God - driven exclusion to its logical conclusion, and it doesn't make the ordinary religious people look good in this day and age.

However, I do have a logical problem with people who want to put the Christian Church's «Stamp of Approval» on the sexual act of sodomy.

I don't think you will meet any logical person who says so.

The fact that so many people believe in some kind of god or another doesn't mean that they have any logical or factual basis to believe in one.

In doing so, God's people would be lead into a «gathering» (Ekklesia) of the Body of Christ that would transcend the logical benefits of having a physical place to see and retreat to.

People who say that observable complexity is proof of design and therefore a designer are only guilty of wishful thinking and do not have a true graps on logical thought.

The really funny part is that these «atheists» are about as logical as my putting signs up because I don't like people believing in purple mushrooms on the plant gobble.

Non-belief that I could not mow my lawn, killed my grass.Non - belief does a person no good.Its an excuse.That's all atheism is.That means its not logical nor do they use logic and reason.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Aesops... threatening people who do not believe in eternal damnation with eternal damnation is logical cancer.

If you look deeply into ANY religion you will see that it doesn't make any logical sense, like talking burning bushes and virgin birth and dead people coming back to life in three days and parting seas with the wave of a hand or walking on water or poison won't kill you and neither will a copperhead.

Without the same person enduring through time, there is no logical basis for accountability for the past or responsibility for what has been done.

Essentially we do want to be good people, but on the other hand we realize that a lot of that was very fear - based to get you to do something as opposed to giving you logical reasons why you should or should not do something.»

@Hilltop Yes, but this «creator» is interpreted in many different ways by many different people who, in the past, did not have the resources to approach a belief system in a completely logical way.

I will never consider it rude to state what the logical conclusion should be according to your attempted deduction, to demand a similarly logical deduction in support of any and all seriously made claims by others, to call out the bullshit when someone fails to do so, or to respond to people behaving like idiots, making idiotic statements or trying to argue without sufficient intellectual abilities, by calling them what they are: idiots.

These are intelligent people and because it does not make logical sense they throw out Christianity and, unfortunately, God and Jesus go right out with the lot.

The problem with articles like this one is that, be it writer or reader, people tend to philosophize and come up with their own logical conclusions as to who God is and what He does or does not.

I have no problem with people presenting biblical / logical / experiential / traditional support for a certain theological position, and doing so passionately and with conviction.

Its more logical to say, there are people who do things for evil reasons, and the majority of people just want to raise their families and live on with their lives in peace.

And when logical people demand proof in order to justify having those beliefs forced on them, theists throw up the irrational «prove god doesn't exist!»

, I just mean that I never do any of those really great things those really smart people writing really quite logical articles suggest, like keeping the amount of stuff you bring down so that it will fit in one of those bitty suitcases you can stuff into overhead.