Sentences with phrase «logical people on»

-- Jews (probably the most scientific, logical people on this planet) seem to understand it.

Not exact matches

«We knew we wanted to focus on the process of getting ready for a race weekend, which is a logical storytelling structure for people who follow the sport and for those who don't.

«She's on the board, so she's a logical interim choice, but not a person who's going to be driver for HP as it transitions to a software and services kind of model,» Gruia added.

and treats people right at the expense of the only logical reality you have on earth.

They are discrediting bible through their wit, intellectual, articulate, scientific and logical but sly arguments to convince every people here on earth that it's a 2000 year old hoax and everything written in it which includes the prophecies in Revelations and the book of Apocalypses that had prophecized their comming.

Everytime religious people post something about God or something out of their belief, there comes the Atheists storming it with their typical (hateful, profane, disrespectful but in - fairness articulate, itellect, scientific and logical) replies and name callings such as; «2000 years religious numbnuts», «oxymorons who keep asking of sky daddy's help», «idiots who was fooled by a magical being in the sky» and so on and so forth.

They are discrediting bible through their wit, intellectual, articulate, scientific and logical arguments to convince every people here on earth that it's a 2000 year old hoax and everything written in it which includes the prophecies in Revelations and the book of Apocalypses that had prophecized their comming.

So, while they may say that questioning strengthens faith, they truly don't mean it... because logical contemplation on the subject matter can lead reasonable people to the conclusion that there is no God... or at the very least that their «chosen» God is not real.

We are on the CNN Belief Blog... it is quite logical and reasonable to expect people to talk about God, sin and faith.

If freedom of speech is made contingent on some other person deciding whether what you are saying is sufficiently logical to pass muster, then it is as good as dead and we non-believers will have played a critical role in destroying what we are supposed to be defending: freedom.

I hope, nevertheless, that my comments may indicate why one person at least on this side of the Atlantic (and hence somewhat isolated from the technical expertise, vocabulary, and sometimes apparently frenetic debates of the community of process thinkers) finds in Hartshorne's work «genuine philosophic wisdom,» especially as it develops insights into the logical status and conceptual structure of a theistic understanding of the concept of God.

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

There is no way in Hell (which there is one) you can convince any logical thinking person (myself included) that my ancestors crawled out of the ocean and somehow magically grew arms and legs from nothing and decided to live on land just «because».

The numbers of logical and reasonable people is on the rise in spite of the campaign against science and facts.

How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their point of view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «religious people».

But to discount an ancient doc.ument merely on the grounds of it mentioning a place or a people that you haven't heard of isn't logical.

Even when an argument is won on pure logical grounds others are not necessarily going to be convinced, for logic does not equal plausibility and because pure logic always has its own inherent bias that makes people suspicious.

The truth of the word depends neither on its objective content nor on its logical coherence, but on the person who speaks it.

Because once the door is open, neither logical nor legal prohibition can keep people — or healthcare laws — from walking on through.

And it is logical and reasonable to see people make such claims on a Belief Blog.

However, I do have a logical problem with people who want to put the Christian Church's «Stamp of Approval» on the sexual act of sodomy.

People who say that observable complexity is proof of design and therefore a designer are only guilty of wishful thinking and do not have a true graps on logical thought.

The really funny part is that these «atheists» are about as logical as my putting signs up because I don't like people believing in purple mushrooms on the plant gobble.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

if most people would view their faith and the books based on their faith in a logical mind - set they themsleves would realize that the bible etc etc etc makes no logical sence.

If you look deeply into ANY religion you will see that it doesn't make any logical sense, like talking burning bushes and virgin birth and dead people coming back to life in three days and parting seas with the wave of a hand or walking on water or poison won't kill you and neither will a copperhead.

Essentially we do want to be good people, but on the other hand we realize that a lot of that was very fear - based to get you to do something as opposed to giving you logical reasons why you should or should not do something.»

On the other hand, people who are the products of a prevailingly analytical, logical habit of mind - possessors of modern Greek - Western modes of thinking, rather than the ancient Hebraic - Eastern quality of thought - instinctively and habitually find themselves delayed, snagged, or otherwise discontented or dismayed by any absence in the text of specific agreement in detail, by any appearance of the inconsistent, whether overt or only implied.

Those people exist on reasonable logical ground the atheist lacks, even if their conclusion is faulty.

Its more logical to say, there are people who do things for evil reasons, and the majority of people just want to raise their families and live on with their lives in peace.

And when logical people demand proof in order to justify having those beliefs forced on them, theists throw up the irrational «prove god doesn't exist!»

Thank you, good to see some people can think for themselves I will put your thumbs down to hitting a nreve on the so called fans, you said something which is true and they didn't like it... so they HAD to do something, even if it is as simple as disliking as they can't put forward a logical argument.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Obviously, there would be a lot of discussion over where the burden of proof lies (you have to have proof before making a claim vs you have to be able to disprove to sanction for a claim), and I think it would differ depending on the kind of statements being made, but the idea that facts are fungible and impossible to determine is a concept that, basically, people who find actual facts inconvenient for their agenda like to claim, but has no logical basis.

None of the three main parties has stood up and made the only logical argument possible in the face of Ukip's crafty and increasingly well - organised crowd - pleasing: that the greatest problems facing Britain are not caused by excessive immigration, and that an excessive clampdown on people coming in will have thoroughly unwanted consequences.

The logical question that ethnic fanatics like you must answer is how did the people of the Niger delta bring about the existence of the oil on their so called land?

Asked about David Davis» decision to fight a by - election on civil liberties: «Because I am quite a logical person, I couldn't get the logical connection between the loss of a vote in the Commons and a decision on something the whole Conservative Party was united about and the decision to resign and fight a byelection.

My principal successor, since I've got two of them, was Pat Fahy, she was on the school board, and it's actually a pretty logical route for people to go into, into elected office.»

The study, by researchers at University of Wisconsin - Madison, the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey, focused on a nest - protection program that was based on the logical assumption that endangered birds would reproduce and prosper if people are kept away from their nests.

The effect of aging on cognitive processes such as learning, memory and logical reasoning have so far been studied almost exclusively in people.

«This is too logical a transition for anyone to have an ideological argument against clean energy, because it stands against economic growth and good business sense,» says Daniel Kammen, professor of energy at the University of California, Berkeley, and science envoy for the U.S. State Department, who is attending the talks, «That's what people are saying here — they're incredulous that anyone would want to back off on this.»

Classical economics is based on the premise that people act rationally, making logical decisions about how and why they spend their money.

it is only logical that a person on a bad diet is likely to have problems with their immune system.

To be fair, most dentists probably don't see many patients who are eating a specific diet to improve their oral health, and most of the studies and research they read is probably done on people eating a somewhat average diet (high in phytic acid and low in Vitamin D), so it is very logical that they wouldn't think that teeth could heal.

While some people go on a diet to keep themselves healthy, it is far more logical and fun to eat for health.

My life's work is Wellness, and while it seems completely logical to me that all doctors would approach well - care by deeply looking at the whole person... Dr. Justin is the first doctor I've worked with that has such a firm grasp on the integration and interplay of taking a whole - person approach.

Many people using essential oils would not know this and may put even the diluted oil on the face or head of a small child - hence the warning is to avoid is logical and wise out of sheer precaution.

Foods common to southeast Asia would have been completely absent in northern Europe at the time, so it's logical to assume that Paleo people in different parts of the world evolved to thrive on different nutritional profiles.

I am having a hair pulling time trying to get a logical explanation as to why I need to eat a bunch of fat on a Keto diet (for an obese person) I have made up my own diet based on hundreds of hours research and combining several diets all into one.

I love being the person to demystify a patient's medical concerns to help them understand what is going on and what to do in the most logical way.