Sentences with phrase «logical question of»
Essentially, if the interviewee answers the question as, «Yes, I am creative,» then the next logical question of the interviewer would be, «OK.
http://www.job-interview-site.com/ Not exact matches
One former employee with knowledge of the process said the interviewers will sometimes take questions to logical extremes to test reactions.
«Telecommunication companies receive a high volume of questions on Facebook,» said Jordan Banks, managing director, Facebook Canada, making it a logical place to offer more responsive customer service.
If you are a seeker of link building services, and are evaluating companies or persons to help with your link building strategies and tactics, it's logical and reasonable to have some questions you want answers for.
In planning the progression of the iterative form fields, consider the logical progression of questions you might ask the lead if speaking to them in person for a sales call.
Some of these questions, I've asked pastors, elders, over and over again, and no one seems to be able to give me an answer that's COMPLETELY sound and all the way logical.
It's not surprising that you would support him / her since NEITHER of you can come up with ANY LOGICAL ANSWERS to the questions.
If you're not going to put the actions of any supernatural being into logical question, by what method would you use to determine if you've been duped?
The question is: Do the functions of creative imagination with its alogical wholes and productive imagination with its attention to logical consistencies or inconsistencies of parts, yield results which are reciprocal or otherwise interdependent or conjoined?
The answer to this question can not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.
We can now deal with the question, earlier deferred, of how it is possible to insist upon internal relations between occasions while at the same time recognizing that from a logical point of view the members of a class of particulars defined by a function would have to be externally related.
Thus it is not a question of the logical possibility, merely, of what might be called a «non-Euclidean theology,» but of its logical necessity, at least if there is to be any theology at all.
What a question i was so pondering upon this i burnt the potatoes for tea but i managed to rescue them from the brink of distruction any way where was i. To me love is not the act in itself because that is a response to love or to be loved.Nor is it a feeling because sometimes we choose to love others despite our feelings we lay aside our own desires for the sake of others.Nor is love confined to reason because it isnt always logical or reasonable and can be totally illogical.
The clue to the logical irreducibility of the latter to the former may be seen in the disparity of the questions we address to each level.
From the point of view of reason, it is most logical that we do not beg the question under discussion.
Although such a doctrine of an immortal soul is usually appealed to in order to answer questions about the meaning of death, it is logical to assert that the soul, whose existence is independent of the body, may therefore originate independently from the body.
In that case, in interpreting a body of propositions hitherto believed to be about the supposed entities, we can substitute the logical structure without altering any of the details of the body of propositions in question.
If the question is about the logical content of the word, the answer is clear.
But mere familiarity is not enough, for it does not answer the fundamental question: if the causal relation is identified with the relation of logical implication in which the premises imply the conclusion, is it possible to obtain any temporal sequence at all without surreptitiously borrowing it from experience?
As Polanyi explained, «The question is whether or not the logical range of random mutations includes the formation of novel principles not definable in terms of physics and chemistry.
So, yes... I «can» argue with it / you... and anyone else who is unfortunately, as quite often the case committing the logical fallacy of «circular reasoning» with a pinch of «begging the question.»
Also from a psychological standpoint, you avoided the question i posed along with showing signs of aggression so apparently you did leave for selfish reasons and not logical one's, Good day.
she sees the questions but doesn't make the logical next step, rather than the inspired word of god, the bible is a collection of myths and legends with a healthy dose of patriarchal control freak
The only logical answer to the question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same answer initially given by the atheist or any person, to the question who will be the first person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.
Exactly — the logical conclusion of creation can never be explained to the small human mind and whether you beleive in God or «the universe» — the question in our small minds is who / what created who / what.
While such considerations bear somewhat on the question of worth, the crucial issue is whether process theology is adequate — adequate to the requirement of logical coherence, and to the demands of modern religious perceptions, Christian and otherwise.
The interesting question in the present context is what the logical necessity of mathematical propositions reveals about the nature of man.
@Chad, Begging the question is a type of logical fallacy in which a proposition relies on an implicit premise within itself to establish the truth of that same proposition.
Yet beyond Whitehead's original harmless and humorous intent, there is a serious and sympathetic sense in which this designation captures precisely the spirit and intent of Russell's basic realistic and logical approach to philosophical questions in the era of G. E. Moore and the «common sense» approach to empiricism.
Inevitably, the modal question of «logical» and «real» possibility will arise.
But far more serious than Anyabwile's logical failings is the failure of this post to extend any sort of grace or dignity to the LGBT people in question.
As much as we might want one of Benedict's limpid, logical interventions on the questions convulsing the Church, we must respect Benedict's decision to keep silence.
It is a very real question whether the later decision to use the forms of Greek logical discourse did not of itself radically affect the nature of the message, the type of audience to which it would appeal, and eventually the constituency of the Church.
This process model of divine spacetime, projected from Whitehead's theory of interpoints and his critique of the Newtonian fallacy of «simple location,» slips into the logical difficulty with which process theology has accused traditional theism: It is always possible to ask whether any proposed empirical signs are signs of God, and it is never possible to provide empirical evidence with which to answer the question (1:42).
Instead of regurgitating the classic evangelical lines, when confronted with these logical problems / questions, are you actually able to explain it in your own words, as if you've thought about it yourself, and not just attended bible study?
On this question the speculative theologian agrees with the rationalist theologian (within, say, process theology), for one of the deepest commitments of the rationalist theologian is to generality as it is revealed in logical thought.
@Eric G: You can't ignore questions about the logical validity of your posts and be taken seriously.
How it was organized has no bearing on whether the language of the questions, and thus the questions themselves, is logical.
A lot of platitudes, like «hate the sin but love the sinner» or, I don't know the all the answers, but I'm sure God knows (which when given as a response to logical questions that are challenging theology, isn't really an answer at all).
His own experience as an undergraduate in the heyday of logical positivism raised serious questions about the possibility of the meaningfulness of moral and religious language.
I'm not telling God how to operate, I'm asking legitimate logical questions, based off the declarations of your preferred religion.
Many theologians who follow Whitehead and Hartshorne are largely concerned with questions of logical, theodicy, and compatibility with biblical and traditional theology.
The central «positive» moral about how best to negotiate between these two models is this: Focus on the nature of the basic movement of theological study as a theological question, not as a question about the psychology of learning, nor even as a question about the logical relations among various subjects studied in theological education.
Then, I allow the convicting and drawing work of the Holy Spirit upon that person and their natural, logical questions to lead me into what other information about the gospel I might share.
You keep dodging the crucial questions I ask you, and as long as you do this you're simply demonstrating your refusal to critical reason with concepts you've convinced yourself are «holy» and beyond the scope of logical reasoning..
Of course, losing two star receivers at the start of the year didn't help McAdoo's chances, so you could make the argument that he was dealt a losing hand, but with the organization moving on we're led to the next logical question: who will replace hiOf course, losing two star receivers at the start of the year didn't help McAdoo's chances, so you could make the argument that he was dealt a losing hand, but with the organization moving on we're led to the next logical question: who will replace hiof the year didn't help McAdoo's chances, so you could make the argument that he was dealt a losing hand, but with the organization moving on we're led to the next logical question: who will replace him?
Sanchez has lost his MOJO no question, same happened to OZIL at some point, the similar patter has a logical explanation, both came from Clubs with a philosophy of WIN IT ALL they both realized they came to the wrong team with a very wrong Manager
In conclusion of this sordid and sorry affair the logical question one must ask is would the current management have persisted with a 17 year old called Francesco Totti?
If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the arguement: «most men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»
This seems like a logical falsehood as a basis of the question, the assumption is that the right doesn't accept 2 state solution (as opposed to the truth, that it supports 2 state solution, but not the exact form of it that antisemitic left in Europe wants - they don't want Jews ethnically cleansed from where they lived for 1000s of years.