Sentences with phrase «logical questions like»

Yeah, I know, I know, logical questions like that will not help convince a writer buried in the myth of needing an agent.

Not exact matches

As my business gains traction, like many entrepreneurs, I find myself at a crossroads questioning if vertical integration is the logical next step for my company.

They like to ask questions like, «How do you know God exists» yet, logical proofs make no sense in their atheistic worldview.

Only eggheads like you feel the need to always have answers to questions that are logical, try a little faith dude, you'll feel better.

A lot of platitudes, like «hate the sin but love the sinner» or, I don't know the all the answers, but I'm sure God knows (which when given as a response to logical questions that are challenging theology, isn't really an answer at all).

If our models are to lead us to ask, and seek answers for, new questions about the world, we must regard them as something more than «logical superfluities», «illicit attempts at explanation», «convenient fictions», or the like.

I'm not sure why that is; it seems like a pretty logical question to me.

This seems like a logical falsehood as a basis of the question, the assumption is that the right doesn't accept 2 state solution (as opposed to the truth, that it supports 2 state solution, but not the exact form of it that antisemitic left in Europe wants - they don't want Jews ethnically cleansed from where they lived for 1000s of years.

The logical question that ethnic fanatics like you must answer is how did the people of the Niger delta bring about the existence of the oil on their so called land?

The internet of full questions like «Should I workout my abs everyday» It seems to be a logical idea without a doubt.

Housemates, Yagan explained, are a logical use case for a platform that matches people based how they answer questions and how they say they'd like their matches to answer them.

Which leads to a logical question: Is it possible to get the benefits annuities can offer while mitigating downsides like mind - numbing complexity, bloated fees and conflicts of interest?

While this seems like a very logical question to ask, it doesn't give the lender all the information needed to give you an accurate answer.

Even seemingly straightforward questions, for example «is X safe» and «is X not safe» seem like (effectively) asking the same question but they may require entirely different analysis and give different results — because of uncertainty in the data, in the results, the logical conclusions / inference required etc. etc..

PDA, The logical question is when will the climate science establishment start actually discussing and arguing, and not simply dismissing things they do not like?

Especially for the experienced ones, there could be questions like arrange a sequence of events in a proper flow, critically examine an essay etc, to test your logical proficiency.

In fact, research on cohabitation suggests that a majority of couples enter cohabitation because of inertia (i.e., it just sort happens or seems like the next logical step) rather than with a purposeful decision.1 This raises an interesting question: do some people approach relationship decisions more actively and with more thoughtfulness than others?

Question for you as someone who has passed, would you say that the test in general is more logical and the correct answer will jump out at you given their good study habits or is the test in general more «tricky» like some of those pre-calculus tests we all remember and the first gut response answer may not be the correct one based on a small detail.