It's watchable for the character detail, but resolutely refuses to make
any logical sense as it charges...
It's watchable for the character detail, but resolutely refuses to make
any logical sense as it charges through its corny plot.
That makes as much
logical sense as saying that since it snowed yesterday, it never snowed before then.
Not exact matches
This community has
as its core a mystery to the human experience, and a
sense that story and imagery can persuade at least
as well
as logical, more strictly factual arguments.
There can be no doubt that God makes decisions a propos of the disjunctive multiplicity of eternal objects; the difficulty is to establish in precisely what
sense these divine decisions are distinguishable from the choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to be this: on the one hand, the principle of classification is to be challenged by positing the primordiality of a world of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in
logical terms»; on the other hand, positing pure potentiality
as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all
logical order would seem to be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»
(1) The concrete universal
as the individual seen in conjunction with the thought structure implied in it, that which makes it an intelligible unity, is neither a naively conceived
sense - object, nor an abstract
logical universal.
One major reform that Hegel seems to have taken upon himself to effect is the production of a
logical hierarchy of being that in a
sense reverses the direction of abstraction of the Aristotelian
logical hierarchy, i.e., that becomes more differentiated and «concrete»
as it rises in generality and inclusiveness, rather than more empty and abstract.
But this «Therefore» doesn't make
sense if you look a the end of chapter 11, where Paul has digressed in a lengthy doxology, which while it discusses intriguing mysteries of God and praises God, doesn't lead to the
logical conclusion that we should present ourselves
as living sacrifices to him, but if you read into that «οὖν» an «
as I was saying earlier», you can see that before the doxology he issued an important warning in Romans 11:22 — if God is willing enough to be so severe
as to cut of the natural branches (the Jews) he will certainly be willing to cut of the ones that have been grafted on (the Gentiles); Romans 12:1 - 2 is a very
logical «therefore» to follow Romans 11:21 - 24.
which makes
sense because it's
logical thoughts that tend to result in us rejecting religious constructs
as preposterous.
Any
logical or mathematical structure in its pure
sense as a potential for actualization of entities is an eternal object.
At the time Whitehead was writing Process and Reality idealist systems were under attack on methodological grounds, first by C. E. Moore
as violating the prescriptions of common
sense, then by the school of
logical positivism represented chiefly by Schlick, Carnap, and Ayer.
From a
logical point of view, however, these two conceptions are not mutually exclusive, especially if Bultmann is right in regarding the true
sense of myth
as the disclosure of the «self - understanding of man», and the objectivizing imagery with its implied mythical world view the inadequate means for the expression of that
sense.
Consequently, if metaphysics can be established at all, it is only
as a transcendental metaphysics, whose concepts and assertions are all purely formal and literal, rather than analogical, in the
sense that they apply to all the different things within any single
logical type whose meaning they explicate, not in different
senses, but rather in the same
sense.
Moreover,
as we learned from our earlier discussion, he can occasionally speak even of a purely formal concept like «relativity»
as being in a broad
sense analogical, because it has systematically different
senses as explicative of the meaning of different
logical types.
But, then, there is something else that he very well could say that would render his apparently contradictory statements consistent — namely, that, although such terms
as «absolute» and «relative,» or «necessary» and «contingent,» explicate the meaning of more than one
logical type, and thus apply to entities within these different types in correspondingly different
senses, rather than in simply the same
sense, they nevertheless apply to the different entities within any single type whose meaning they in some
sense explicate, not in different
senses, but rather in the same
sense.
Thus Hartshorne holds that the term «feeling,» for instance, can be said to be analogical in this
sense because, or insofar
as, it applies to all entities of the
logical type of individuals, including the unique individual God, but does so in suitably different
senses to all the different kinds or levels of individuals, with its
sense being infinitely different in its application to God (1962, 140).
When Hartshorne says that there is a
sense in which analogical terms apply literally to God and, therefore, simply are literal in this application, what he means by «literal» is not that such terms apply to God in the same
sense in which they apply to any other entity of the same
logical type, this being,
as we have seen, what he otherwise takes «literal» to mean.
Raised a Protestant, despite all my thrashing and twisting I eventually couldn't help but believe that the apostolic succession, through Peter
as the designated leader and primus inter pares, is in some
logical or theological
sense prior to everything else — including even Scripture, whose formation was guided and completed by the apostles and their successors, themselves inspired by the Holy Spirit.
You will find this all difficult to accept, because
as you say, it doesn't make
logical sense.
But it makes good
logical sense to say that
as elements of human knowledge, the so - called apriori truths are mere hypotheses about the universal conditions of existence.
So transferring the existential valence of existing to «actuality»» has the
logical effect of reducing our ordinary
sense of «existing» to that of «self identity» and so picture the act of creation
as one of adding existence to already constituted individuals.
Yet, given the
logical problems connected with the notion of a finite actual entity somehow prehending the objective integration of the primordial and consequent natures within God (
as indicated above), it makes
sense to think of God's influence on the concrescing actual occasion simply in terms of divine feelings vis - à - vis objective possibilities already present in the world
as a common field of activity for God and all finite actual occasions.
As far as I can gather, your position is based on a sense that faith did not work for you or did not appear logical to yo
As far
as I can gather, your position is based on a sense that faith did not work for you or did not appear logical to yo
as I can gather, your position is based on a
sense that faith did not work for you or did not appear
logical to you.
On some level, Smits, who now weighs roughly 270 pounds, the same
as during his playing days, figures it makes
logical sense: «It's a lot of weight we're lugging around.»
I just think the product he and Nolan continued to field on defense made no
logical sense and got worse
as time went on.
Howard Gardner is a psychologist and professor known for developing of the theory of multiple intelligences, which points out that a person has multiple intelligences distributed in various skills, such
as logical reasoning, language, music, spatial
sense, kinesthetic ability, and interpersonal and intrapersonal skills.
The move also made
logical sense in that World Service journalists will soon be housed in the same «West One» building
as other BBC journalists.
However, to cast Stalin
as worse than Hitler based upon body count alone makes no
logical sense.
So, there is no way, and it doesn't even make
logical sense that the electoral commission
as a body, made up of a lot of individuals could just sit down and then fish out the names of persons, who belong to any political party, and to delete them.»
For Castillo, this is
logical, «the current debate
as to whether the blood - alcohol level should be zero in Spain doesn't make much
sense.
While that does make
logical sense, love knows not of logic, and
as fate would have it monogamous and non-monogamous people can and frequently do find themselves involved, in love, and in relationships.
As they say looks can be misleading good & bad but I'm worth seeking out:)
sense of humor, mature, and open minded to new things within
logical reason.
I'd describe myself
as a fun, versatile combination of Mr. Spock, Will Ferrell, and Plato - which means that I'm a
logical person who possesses a goofy
sense of humor and a love for truth and never - ending knowledge.
Release Date: This has been in the can for a good amount of time now, and when Berlin Film Fest didn't announce it
as part of there line - up, the next
logical guess is Cannes — which sort of makes
sense as she was president of the Un Certain Regard jury the year after her success.
However, sometimes films that feature such inconsistencies can still succeed
as entertainment, despite making very little
logical sense in terms of adhering to a set of tangible rules, whether real or concocted.
When you develop your own course, it is easy to think the assignments and course
as a whole makes perfect
sense and everything is
logical.
It makes
logical sense that because, in many places, the experience of school is being radically rethought to better meet the needs of all kids, the physical school environment needs to get a refresh
as well.
Just
as important, according to Lovell and others, is for reporters to make sure that state plans make
sense from a
logical perspective.
I feel the need to email KDP directly and get some response because it doesn't make
logical sense and (
as you mentioned) plenty of authors are doing it.
As silly as this may sound, even though the credit card debt is only $ 9,000 it might make logical sense to consider bankruptcy for that for two reason
As silly
as this may sound, even though the credit card debt is only $ 9,000 it might make logical sense to consider bankruptcy for that for two reason
as this may sound, even though the credit card debt is only $ 9,000 it might make
logical sense to consider bankruptcy for that for two reasons.
The
logical thing is a reduction in Equity through a negative Treasury Stock entry — makes
sense, an Asset (Cash) is decreased / eliminated because of the buyback, so we need a corresponding reduction in the Liability side of the B / S, in Equity — but on occasion I've seen shares rather bizarrely carried on the B / S
as an Asset!
My current concern with BMO is that this equity raise makes no
logical sense from a valuation perspective and unless they anticipate their tier 1 capital ratio being hammered down in the foreseeable future this almost appears
as desperate in comparison to their peers.
Most people would not consider a mortgage
as one of the
logical bankruptcy alternatives, but for many people it may make
sense.
The
logical explanation is that I had enough risk in my portfolio, and
as for the low - risk portion of my money, it made no
sense to borrow at 3.0 % after taxes and invest it at 2.2 % in, say, Treasuries.
I was thinking about Google Finance,
as that seemed to have nice features, but in hindsight I've read a fair few good articles on Stockopedia so that may make
logical sense.
It was added to help give a
sense of progression and achievement to the arcade portion of the game
as well
as show which levels you've played / not played in a
logical way.
Gone Home works with that same experience of fascination and
logical inference, while playing
as someone who belongs in this place lends a
sense of intimacy almost from the beginning.
As it is difficult to imagine you could be using «validated» as a term that is synonymous with «valid» in its logical sense, I checked Wikipedi
As it is difficult to imagine you could be using «validated»
as a term that is synonymous with «valid» in its logical sense, I checked Wikipedi
as a term that is synonymous with «valid» in its
logical sense, I checked Wikipedia.
What I am saying is that it makes no
sense at all to hand - wave at the effects of uncontrolled volcanic eruptions
as «absolute proof» that geoengineering schemes «can work», while promoting a gradual 50 - year phaseout of GHG emissions (which is too slow to have any hope of preventing catastrophic outcomes)
as «
logical» (whatever that means) and ignoring the multiple studies that show we can easily phase out emissions in a fraction of that time with the proven technologies that are already at hand.
Your assessment of the communicative «risks» may make
logical sense, but in order to verify the cause - and - effect you are suggesting you need data that control for confounding variables, such
as political identification.