Then there are the less
logical thoughts people like me — who value predictability, organization, and high levels of competence — entertain while we're sitting there, every two or three hours, breastfeeding our bottomless pit of a baby.
Any logical thinking person understands this, but I do not believe logic and intelligence always co-exist anymore.
it amazes me that religious folk see this word as a badge of honor while
any logical thinking person sees it as a mark of foolishness or insanity.
There is no way in Hell (which there is one) you can convince
any logical thinking person (myself included) that my ancestors crawled out of the ocean and somehow magically grew arms and legs from nothing and decided to live on land just «because».
Cus I don't see how
any logical think person can put arsenal and tittle in the same sentence.
I love arsenal fc but I am
a logical thinking person.
but, being
the logical thinking person that I am, I have the following question... If Dr. G's video was correct, then it would follow that the masses of paleo eaters would become diabetics with extremely high cholesterol levels!
Not exact matches
The answer to the puzzle of why
people don't do what is
logical and beneficial for the individual and the team, lies deeper than you might
think.
«Time and time again,
people of faith routinely supress (sic) their
logical thoughts and merely «accept» the religion that they are exposed to.»
But the
logical atheist would
think... billions of
people experience something that I don't experience, sure they call it by different names, but they still are experiencing something.
If the true teachings of Jesus — which to me appear mostly
logical and reasonable, are allowed to shine through all the hyperbole, I
think a lot of
people would be attracted to his way of life.
W - Pointing out the foolishness of other
ppl's
thoughts by taking it to the next
logical step is something beyond most
ppl.
Maybe I need to go back to college and take an «Advanced Religious Metaphor» class, because to a rational
person that sounded like random words strung together without any form of
logical thought.
Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly
logical «smart» often well educated
people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as
people out there generally
think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.
Anyone who can
think a
logical, independent
thought has to wonder what sort of
people put any credence in what this gray - hair, racist, flip - flopping, money - loving thief has to say... he's fleeced his flock just like the other evangelical snake - oil vendors.
The
logical necessity of mathematics rests upon the basic «laws of
thought,» which define not how
people actually do
think, but how they ought to
think, if the goal of universal understanding and agreement is to be achieved.
I don't
think you will meet any
logical person who says so.
People who say that observable complexity is proof of design and therefore a designer are only guilty of wishful
thinking and do not have a true graps on
logical thought.
I
think it's more telling that you choose to nit - pick
people's grammar instead of engaging in a
logical debate.
On the other hand,
people who are the products of a prevailingly analytical,
logical habit of mind - possessors of modern Greek - Western modes of
thinking, rather than the ancient Hebraic - Eastern quality of
thought - instinctively and habitually find themselves delayed, snagged, or otherwise discontented or dismayed by any absence in the text of specific agreement in detail, by any appearance of the inconsistent, whether overt or only implied.
It seems odd that so many
people think that answer less
logical than «big invisible and undetectable sky wizard chanted it all into existence with magic spellzzzzz!»
It's also irrational to
think that the number of
people involved makes their belief the slightest bit more
logical or rational.
How about we teach
people self - control, I
think that is more
logical than illegalizing everything anyone could possibly hurt themselves with if they use improperly.
I'd always
thought of myself as quite a
logical person, and someone who wouldn't be caught dieting or caught shopping for trends.
Thank you, good to see some
people can
think for themselves I will put your thumbs down to hitting a nreve on the so called fans, you said something which is true and they didn't like it... so they HAD to do something, even if it is as simple as disliking as they can't put forward a
logical argument.
We like to
think of ourselves as strong, calm,
logical people, especially when we're parenting, and emotional flashbacks can derail us, for a few seconds or a few days.
and B) I wish
people would
think about the
logical connection between «studies» and their parenting practices before demonizing others.
It speaks volumes about the natural pathways of a
person's
thoughts that «outlawing» is seen as a
logical consequence of an activity being identified as risky.
Now, a
logical,
thinking person would watch something like this and know that despite its gratuitous title, it is not about homeschooling.
Obviously, there would be a lot of discussion over where the burden of proof lies (you have to have proof before making a claim vs you have to be able to disprove to sanction for a claim), and I
think it would differ depending on the kind of statements being made, but the idea that facts are fungible and impossible to determine is a concept that, basically,
people who find actual facts inconvenient for their agenda like to claim, but has no
logical basis.
For
people who appreciate
logical thought combined with a lively mind, who can tolerate long working hours in a partner, who love the outdoors and have little patience for superstition, Lambert's service can be a real boon.
There is much dubious pop psychology written about «right - brain
people» and «left - brain
people», but it is accepted that the left side is mainly involved in language and
logical analysis, while the right side is more involved in creative
thought.
I am still uncertain if an academic career is for me, but regardless of my future employment options, I
think my teaching experience will be advantageous as it demonstrates to an employer that I have the ability to present data to a group of
people in a
logical manner.
It's
logical to
think that the brain's need for oxygen is what limits how long
people can hold their breath.
To be fair, most dentists probably don't see many patients who are eating a specific diet to improve their oral health, and most of the studies and research they read is probably done on
people eating a somewhat average diet (high in phytic acid and low in Vitamin D), so it is very
logical that they wouldn't
think that teeth could heal.
There is something about this country and this nation that makes you want to
think about the «matters of the flesh and heart» and it is only
logical to be interested in meeting these
people.
Late in the film, the subject argues against the latter in terms that are fully
logical, but his
thinking is too far ahead of its time for the
person receiving the idea to understand.
But once we realize that
people have very different kinds of minds, different kinds of strengths — some
people are good in
thinking spatially, some in
thinking language, others are very
logical, other
people need to be hands - on and explore actively and try things out — then education, which treats everybody the same way, is actually the most unfair education.
The policy in this luxury area is if you follow the
logical thinking through of what
people call car care — ride sharing, and connecting cars, and autonomous cars, and zero emission, where do you end up?
How to utilize the quantitative data by a
person of the business organization to take necessary decision for the business Flourishment based on his own
logical thinking.
The main difference of the critical
thinking assignment is that it requires a
person to showcase his own observations and
thoughts, completing them with
logical analysis and sound arguments.
I don't
think you're going to be able to convince them, since most
people arguing with them are coming at it from a
logical / economic standpoint and the publishers
think it's some kind of ego trip or moral crusade.
Thinking about the market going lower makes most
people nervous, but it seems perfectly
logical for an investor with a 5 - 10 year horizon to actually hope for a flat / declining market.
I always
thought of myself as a pretty
logical person so I was able to rationalize that spending $ 5000 on «stuff» was illogical.
Many
people who get themselves into debt do so by turning off their
logical thinking abilities and buy «to make themselves feel better».
When making a decision about what type of dog to get
people often
think of the artificial factors such as color, size and cuteness but they should really be
thinking about the more
logical factors including how intelligent they are and thus how trainable and obedient they will be.
If this shutdown was in the works, it is
logical to
think that it was kept under wraps for fear the word would get out, spread, and then
people would grab their CB before the closures began.
It's not
logical to
think that way, but this is how many
people think.
No, the most
logical move is to stop ps plus until they
think of a solution to this problem, e.g. give
people a choice of monthly games.
Like many
people, at the time I tended to
think of organizational change as a rational,
logical process.