Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, both conservatives, hinted during an hour -
long argument in the case at support for the Justice Department's stance that because Microsoft is based in the United States it was obligated to turn over data sought by prosecutors in a U.S. warrant.
Not exact matches
In which
case the
argument is no
longer self - contradictory.
The counter view is that while this
argument might have had some basis before Labour capitulated to Osborne's austerity agenda
in its response to the Spending Review, agreed with a welfare cap and now wants to end the trade union link, that is no
longer the
case.
At 10 a.m., a
Long Island man seeking exoneration after he pleaded guilty as an 18 - year - old
in 1988 to sexually abusing boys and served 13 years
in prison, Jesse Friedman, attends oral
arguments in a state appeals court hearing seeking Nassau County DA and police files
in the
case; 45 Monroe Pl., Brooklyn.
The former senator, who, according to an aide, served
in Congress with Kasich, called his chosen candidate «a proven political winner
in a very tough state for Republicans» — ironically, the very same
argument Pataki is making as he makes his
case for his
long - shot bid for the presidency.
The essence of the
argument is that you don't need any new information,
in this
case the fact that you woke up, to understand why the odds are no
longer 50/50.
That was
longer than planned and
longer than
arguments in similar regulatory
cases, observers said.
Moreover, I present the D.C.
case only as possible cheating, and one could simply delete D.C. from the
long list of
cases documented
in Charade without weakening the
argument.
Responding to a hypothetical question posed by Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Julius L. Chambers of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund conceded that if his
argument won the day, orders
in such
cases could conceivably remain
in force for 100 years or more if the effects of segregation persisted that
long.
But meanwhile,
in most of tenure
cases so far under the new law, the
arguments have been over typically either individual incidents of alleged misconduct or
longer patterns of teachers failing to improve their practices.
In another Albany chamber that same morning, a court prepared to hear the opening argument in a long - running education finance case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peer
In another Albany chamber that same morning, a court prepared to hear the opening
argument in a long - running education finance case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peer
in a
long - running education finance
case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less
in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peer
in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peers.
Citing a
long line of
cases that include tax refunds as part of the bankruptcy estate, the court found the debtor's
argument unpersuasive and ordered that he turn over the funds minus approximately $ 10,000 he had available
in unused exemptions.
Some do not agree with holding for a
long time
argument in all
cases.
This «actuarial equivalence,» however, doesn't take into account three valuable benefits that tilt the
argument in favor of delaying: spousal benefits, survivor benefits and the financial safety net that Social Security provides
in case you live
longer than expected.
The End of Nature (1989) The Age of Missing Information (1992) Hope, Human and Wild: True Stories of Living Lightly on the Earth (1995) Maybe One: A Personal and Environmental
Argument for Single Child Families (1998) Hundred Dollar Holiday: The
Case for a More Joyous Christmas (1998)
Long Distance: Testing the Limits of Body and Spirit
in a Year of Living Strenuously (2001) Enough: Staying Human
in an Engineered Age (2003) Wandering Home: A
Long Walk Across America's Most Hopeful Landscape (2005) The Comforting Whirlwind: God, Job, and the Scale of Creation (2005) Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future (2007) Fight Global Warming Now: The Handbook for Taking Action
in Your Community (2007) The Bill McKibben Reader: Pieces from an Active Life (2008) American Earth: Environmental Writing Since Thoreau (edited)(2008) Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet (2010) The Global Warming Reader: A Century of Writing About Climate Change (2011) Oil and Honey: The Education of an Unlikely Activist (2013)
It is arguable that my imposing a
longer licence period
in respect of these prisoners, Art 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights is engaged, although bearing
in mind recent
cases attempting to highlight differences between the 1991 and CJA 2003 regimes, it is unlikely that such
arguments will find favour with the courts, but we shall see!
Their
argument is that the
case took
longer than 18 months
in the provincial courts.
I wonder how
long it will be before a lawyer hands his tablet up to a Judge
in court — allowing the judge to read the
case that they just pulled down from the web
in response to their opponent's
argument?
The court, rather summarily, dismissed all of the appellant's
arguments save and except for costs of the trial, which the court reduced to $ 76,000.00, on the grounds that the trial judge appeared to have mistakenly believed that a particular offer to settle had been open for acceptance
longer than had
in fact been the
case.
Where a
case has been
in the system for a
long time and has been delayed through no fault of the plaintiff, a good
argument can be made that the plaintiff should not «lose» what could amount to tens of thousands of dollars
in PJI simply because the
case was delayed
in proceeding to trial.
Truth is an
argument to any defamation
case and
in this context we could also extend to the defence of fair comment where as
long as honestly held views are being expressed but there no issue of defamation.
This same
argument was rejected by the European Court of Human Rights as
long ago as 2004
in the seminal Bournewood
case (HL v United Kingdom (App No 45508 / 99), [2004] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)-RRB-.
The Surpreme Court will on Tuesday hear
arguments in a
long - running
case between the U.S. government and Microsoft, following the latter's 2013 refusal to turn over data stored on an Irish server, demanded as part of a drug trafficking investigation.
With that said, however, an active futures market also makes it easier to go
long bitcoin than is the
case currently, and this is where the bullish counter
argument comes
in.