That legislation created an automatic escalator allowing the program to grow up to 25 percent per year, so
long as corporations are willing to donate, and so long as parents desire scholarships for their children.
As
long as these corporations were performing public services, it made sense for taxpayers to share in the risks.
You will never have honest politicians as
long as corporations are allowed to buy them.
I want you to know that I am among the many who see through your public relations tactics, and I will continue to refuse to buy Nestle products as
long as the corporation continues to put profits before life.
The plaintiffs alleged that under the wording of the investor passes, the holder is entitled «to the free use of all ski lifts operated by (Sherburne) Killington Ltd. at (Killington Basin) Killington Ski Area so
long as the corporation shall operate in that area under an agreement with the state of Vermont.»
But, hey, so
long as every corporation gets treated equally.
Also, pass - through tax treatment (which had already applied to sole proprietorships and partnerships) meant that owners had to pay tax on the income as it was earned, unlike the shareholders of C corporations who, in the words of Tax Foundation economist Kyle Pomerleau, «can defer the taxation on their share of corporate income as
long as the corporation retains its earnings or if the shareholder does not realize a capital gain on his stock.»
Not exact matches
This decision resulted in a flurry of organizations called «Super PACs,» which enable individuals and
corporations to donate unlimited funds
as long as there is no direct coordination with the candidate.
As long as you accept that fact, you can then talk seriously about just what bundle of rights and responsibilities corporations ought to have — that is, what form their personhood should tak
As long as you accept that fact, you can then talk seriously about just what bundle of rights and responsibilities corporations ought to have — that is, what form their personhood should tak
as you accept that fact, you can then talk seriously about just what bundle of rights and responsibilities
corporations ought to have — that is, what form their personhood should take.
But
corporations in the U.S. are permitted to spend unlimited amounts to support or oppose a candidate
as long as they or the organizations they contribute to do not coordinate this activity with the candidate.
Harvard's Czeisler, perhaps the leading expert on sleep and productivity, points out that while
corporations have policies around harmful practices such
as smoking and drinking, they tacitly encourage
long hours unrelieved by sufficient rest.
Some owners of family
corporations tend to stay in leadership too
long and
as a result their more conservative approach shuns innovation and new technologies.
«The new contract said he could become a «general partner or member of any
corporation, partnership, company or firm,» so
long as the activity was a «passive investment» that involved «minimal» time.
«With any
corporation,
as long as you have a C
corporation, the IRS wants you to pay dividends,» O'Donnell says.
Instead, whether you chose to establish an S
corporation or a C
corporation probably depended on your
long - term financing strategies
as well
as a variety of legal and tax considerations.
So
as long as the guiding principles of management teams do not change, then
corporations with strong histories of increasing dividends have high probabilities of doing so in the future.
Maintain a diversified portfolio of common stocks in some form
as long as business conditions are favorable;
corporations are able to maintain and increase their earnings; and employment rates are high.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or
long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign
corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,»
corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock
as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.
The Canadian company is basically conceding that it can no
longer compete on its own
as a publicly traded
corporation.
Long before he was ignoring basic political rules, he was sailing far beyond the limits of his industry, steering an empire that's
as similar to most
corporations as his run is to most presidential campaigns.
«Sherway has a
long history
as a neighbourhood centre but it always had a strong fashion and aspirational fashion offering,» said Finley McEwen, senior vice-president, The Cadillac Fairview
Corporation Ltd..
As long as the Infrastructure Crown Corporation recoups its borrowing and administrative costs, there would be no incremental impact on the federal government's budgetary balanc
As long as the Infrastructure Crown Corporation recoups its borrowing and administrative costs, there would be no incremental impact on the federal government's budgetary balanc
as the Infrastructure Crown
Corporation recoups its borrowing and administrative costs, there would be no incremental impact on the federal government's budgetary balance.
As a historical matter, the original purpose of the
corporation — reflected in debates about limited liability and general incorporation statutes — was to facilitate economic growth by enabling projects that required large - scale,
long - term investment.
When Hobby Lobby pays its bill to an insurance provider, its money becomes indistinguishable from other money paid by other
corporations, and all of it forms a block of identical money, some of which will be used, so
long as the insurance company offers plans extending to contraception, to pay for it.
Starting in the 1950s and accelerating during Japan's bubble, keiretsu
corporations purchased each other's shares to form an extensive network of cross-holdings, a practice that was seen
as important for guaranteeing
long - term stability and developing lasting business relationships.
Likewise, the unveiling of the
long - awaited Republican tax plan didn't immediately move the markets, even though it was widely regarded
as positive for
corporations.
Also referred to
as a certificate of dissolution, these documents essentially declare your
corporation or LLC
as no
longer in existence with the state.
I think it would be interesting to see how an all REIT play might perform over the
long haul and I would only fill it with names I deem to be of quality such
as W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC), Realty Income
Corporation (O) or even Digital Realty Trust Inc. (DLR).
As a result, only those issuers that have more than one director interlock with non-affiliated
corporations received deduction in The
Long View.
Long before she embarked upon the journey that is now the
Corporation for Social Security Claiming Strategies, Cheryl was an avid researcher and writer
as Managing Editor of the Law Review and clerk in the appellate screening division of the Rhode Island Supreme Court where she had several successes.....
Shares of The
Long Island Iced Tea
Corporation soared
as much
as 432 % pre-market Thursday morning after the company said it would change it's name t...
So
long as the land is held by
corporations and machines, this possibility does not exist.
I have been strongly opposed to this from the beginning, but
as long as it was economically profitable, and those who suffered were not politically powerful, it was extended by the World Trade Organization and other international economic organizations working together with huge agricultural
corporations and the American government.
As of now (hours after the president's tweet), the official defense.gov website says, «Transgender Service members may serve openly, and they can no
longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military solely for being transgender individuals» and «This policy was crafted through a comprehensive and inclusive process that included the leadership of the Armed Services, medical and personnel experts across the Department, transgender Service members, outside medical experts, advocacy groups, and the RAND
Corporation.»
As he put it, «The law gives to capital an immense advantage in permitting its consolidation in great centralized corporations; and neither law nor justice can forbid laborers to combine, in order to protect themselves against the encroachments of capital, so long as they abstain from, that use of violence and rely upon reason and moral influence.&raqu
As he put it, «The law gives to capital an immense advantage in permitting its consolidation in great centralized
corporations; and neither law nor justice can forbid laborers to combine, in order to protect themselves against the encroachments of capital, so
long as they abstain from, that use of violence and rely upon reason and moral influence.&raqu
as they abstain from, that use of violence and rely upon reason and moral influence.»
Long into the 19th century,
corporations were circumscribed
as to the amount of capital they could solicit ($ 100,000, for instance, in New York under the law of 1811); they were usually confined to a single type of operation (say, textile manufacturing or flour milling); and they were required to dissolve after a specific number of years, 20 or 30.
I have the feeling that so
long as the Multinational
Corporations remain the sole source of technological creativity, it is impossible to replace it however inhuman they become, unless a similar technical creativity is shown by an alternative human pattern of society.
When capital and labor,
as categories, no
longer make
as much sense
as they once did, it is not clear who in a
corporation should have more power than others.
To restructure the incentives of the market so
as to favor
long - term investment over short - term consumption, or to change the institutionalization of the
corporation to accountable democratic citizenship, does not at all mean to centralize industry under a government ministry.
One possible step forward is that abortion providers —
as long as they are legally allowed in this country — should have to be independent
corporations that only perform abortions and receive no federal funding, with regular inspections and investigations both financial and health - related, and the passing of new laws which more strictly regulate their practice.
I do believe marriage should be restricted to just two people, but other than that,
as long as they are human people (not
corporation people) and adult, I really don't care what their gender is.
As we saw also, governments are very responsive to corporate wealth and influence, and they often subordinate the
long - term common good to the short - term gains of individual
corporations or simply of governmental leaders themselves.
And if only «religious groups» are given protection, we are a
long way from full, robust protection for religious conscience, which belongs to everyone who can be a moral agent: individuals, groups, churches, ministries, nonprofit - sector
corporations, and for - profit
corporations too (
as in the case of Hobby Lobby in the HHS mandate controversy).
So
long as they don't pour more millions of dollars into a campaign that is already criminally overfunded by the
corporations and the billionaires who will be expecting a «return» on their investments.
This will also have the added benefit of acting
as an investment by these
corporations in their suppliers, providing, one hopes, some
long - term stability.
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team
long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so
long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no
longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this
corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but
as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
to me we are just watching the inevitable consequences of a bursting football bubble which is what AFC (Arsenal Financial
Corporation) has become under the Franco American alliance... to be honest its lasted
longer than I expected
as the signs of a Ponzi club were visible 5 years ago but somehow the 4th place zombie fans kept the thing going
longer than I expected but the bust is, consequently, even more worrisome for the
long term health of the club... obviously Wenger should have gone 5 years back but that was not in the interest of the vulture owner... next steps are uncertain but I hope fans show their disgust by not showing up to the emirates next game
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix,
as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures,
as each were being run by
corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how
long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
Special arrangements, usually paid for by the
corporation, can include
longer hours of operation or weekend care options
as well
as special «parent night outs» or other «quality of life» features.
But
as long as this country and their government continues to worship at the feet of
corporations and the almighty dollar then this type of situation will continue to happen.